Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

The going concern concept in the assessment of creditworthiness of economic entities

Vol. 16, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2017

Received: 2 October 2017

Received in revised form: 6 October 2017

Accepted: 12 October 2017

Available online: 27 October 2017

Subject Heading: FINANCIAL STABILITY AND SOLVENCY

JEL Classification: O12, Q01

Pages: 1840–1858

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.16.10.1840

Babicheva N.E. Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russian Federation sigaeva@mail.ru

Lyubushin N.P. Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russian Federation lubushinnp@mail.ru

Kondrat'ev R.Yu. Lipetsk Branch of Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Lipetsk, Russian Federation romario_80@inbox.ru

Subject The article analyzes existing contradictions in the implementation of the going concern principle and securing the creditworthiness.
Objectives The aim is to provide a unique comprehensive study of the going concern concept in relation to creditworthiness of economic entities to synthesize two accounting concepts, i.e. the dynamic and static balance sheet.
Methods We employ general scientific principles and research methods, namely, a historical approach, analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, grouping, comparison, abstraction, generalization, and analogy.
Results The paper proves the hypothesis that entity’s creditworthiness is a complex accounting and analytical characteristic reflecting the continuity of operations. If the entity does not ensure its creditworthiness, there exists a threat to its going concern. The lack of financial solvency leads to bankruptcy, and the economic entity may cease its operations.
Conclusions The existing contradictions in the going concern and creditworthiness assessment appeared in the 19th century. We suggest that the development of the theory and practice of accounting and economic analysis should now move towards the synthesis of accounting concepts of dynamic and static balance sheet through integrated reporting. This will enable to create information basis to reveal and prevent threats to going concern by assessment of creditworthiness and solvency of entities.

Keywords: business continuity management, BCM, going concern, creditworthiness, sustainable development

References:

  1. Mendel'son L.A. Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh krizisov i tsiklov [The theory and the history of economic crises and cycles]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi literatury Publ., 1959, 693 p.
  2. Kovalev V.V. Finansovyi uchet i analiz: kontseptual'nye osnovy [Financial accounting and analysis: Conceptual framework]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2004, 720 p.
  3. Altman E.I. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 1968, no. 23(4), pp. 589–609.
  4. Çelik R., Bilen B., Bilen Ö. The Impacts of Changes in Macro-Economic Data on Net Working Capital: The Case of Turkey’s Industrial Sector. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2016, vol. 38, pp. 122–134. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30184-8
  5. Shevelev A.E. Kontseptsiya nepreryvnosti deyatel'nosti v bukhgalterskom uchete predpriyatiya v sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh: monografiya [The Going Concern concept in accounting records of the enterprise under modern economic conditions: a monograph]. Chelyabinsk, South Ural State University Publ., 2005, 210 p.
  6. Amanzholova B.A., Ovchinnikova N.N. [Going concern in financial statements and accounting policy: Forecasting the economic and social impact]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2015, vol. 14, iss. 46, pp. 44–55. (In Russ.)
  7. Endovitskii D.A., Babushkin V.A, Baturina N.A. Analiz investitsionnoi privlekatel'nosti organizatsii [Analysis of investment attractiveness of the organization]. Moscow, KnoRus Publ., 2010, 376 p.
  8. Lyubushin N.P., Babicheva N.E. [Analyzing the techniques to evaluate financial condition of the organization]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2006, no. 22, pp. 2–7. (In Russ.)
  9. Edronova V.N., Khasyanova S.Yu. [Foreign and domestic approaches to defining the creditworthiness of borrowers]. Finansy i kredit =Finance and Credit, 2002, no. 10, pp. 25–27. (In Russ.)
  10. Kleiner G.B. Razvitie teorii ekonomicheskikh sistem i ee primenenie v korporativnom i strategicheskom upravlenii [Development of the theory of economic systems and its application in corporate and strategic management]. Moscow, CEMI RAS Publ., 2010, 59 p.
  11. Cordoş George-Silviu, Fulop Melinda-Timea. New Audit Reporting Challenges: Auditing the Going Concern Basis of Accounting. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 216–224. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01385-4
  12. Provasi R., Riva P. Assessment of Going Concern for the Italian Listed Companies: An Empirical Study. URL: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3311016301/assessment-of-going-concern-for-the-italian-listed
  13. Dănescu T., Mărginean R. The Evaluation of the Going Principle through the Altman Pattern – Case Study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 1667–1674. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01493-8
  14. Robu I.B., Balan C.B., Jaba E. The Estimation of the Going Concern Ability of Quoted Companies, Using Duration Model. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 62, pp. 876–880. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.147
  15. Dmitrenko I.N., Belousova I.N. [The evolution of conceptual approach to going concern assumption]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2007, no. 10, pp. 34–38; no. 11, pp. 49–54. (In Russ.)
  16. Baetge J. Balansovedenie: monografiya [Bilanzen]. Moscow, Bukhgalterskii uchet Publ., 2000, 411 p.
  17. Shilova, L.F., Mirgorodskaya M.G. [The system of principles, its development based on the concepts of accounting study and application in modern conditions]. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki = Innovative Development of Economy, 2013, no. 4-5, pp. 230–237. (In Russ.)
  18. Doronina F.Kh. [The principle of continuity in international and national systems of accounting and reporting]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta imeni S.Yu. Vitte. Ser. 1: Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2015, no. 1, pp. 107–113. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.muiv.ru/vestnik/pdf/eu/eu_2015_1_107-113.pdf
  19. Sokolov Ya.V. Osnovy teorii bukhgalterskogo ucheta: monografiya [Fundamentals of the accounting theory]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2003, 496 p.
  20. Predeus N.V. [Theoretical analysis of the concepts of static and dynamic accounting]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2012, vol. 15, iss. 15, pp. 13–25. (In Russ.)
  21. Richard J. Bukhgalterskii uchet: teoriya i praktika [Accounting: Theory and practice]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2000, 160 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 10
October 2017

Archive