Digest Finance
 

A Social Innovation Impact Assessment Matrix

Vol. 22, Iss. 4, DECEMBER 2017

Received: 15 May 2017

Received in revised form: 1 June 2017

Accepted: 26 June 2017

Available online: 19 December 2017

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: L31, O35

Pages: 365–378

https://doi.org/10.24891/df.22.4.365

Popov E.V. Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation epopov@mail.ru

Veretennikova A.Yu. Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation vay_uiec@mail.ru

Omonov Zh.K. Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation jomaomon@gmail.com

Importance This article focuses on developing tools to measure an impact of social innovation, taking into account commercial and social benefits of introducing social innovation.
Objectives We aim to develop our own matrix for the evaluation of the impact of social innovation.
Methods We use methods of systematization, logical analysis, regression analysis, etc.
Results The article shows possible areas of institutional development that ensure the effective performance of social and innovation activities, including the development of both efficient formal institutions and social capital.
Conclusions and Relevance The theoretical analysis, as well as the results of the application of the developed assessment matrix of social innovation at the regional level, have made it possible to identify the characteristics of social innovation. The matrix makes it possible to identify the characteristics of social innovation functioning in a given territory and also becomes an initial stage for the institutional development directions.

Keywords: social innovation, performance matrix, effective development, institutional environment

References:

  1. Moore M.-L., Westley F.R. Public Sector Policy and Strategies for Facilitating Social Innovation. Horizons: Innovative Communities, Agents of Change, 2011, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 1–11. URL: http://www.sosyalinovasyonmerkezi.com.tr/yayin/1020110007.pdf
  2. Murray R., Caulier-Grice J., Mulgan G. The Open Book of Social Innovation. The Young Foundation, 2010, 224 p. URL: https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf
  3. Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood D., Hamdouch A. (Eds). General Introduction: The Return of Social Innovation as a Scientific Concept and a Social Practice. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. 2013, pp. 1–6. URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781849809986.00008.xml doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781849809993.00008
  4. Nicholls A., Ziegler R. An Extended Social Grid Model for the Study of Marginalization Processes and Social Innovation. CRESSI Working Papers, 2014, no. 2/2015, pp. 1–13. URL: http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research-projects/CRESSI/docs/CRESSI_Working_Paper_2_D1.1_Chp2_18Nov2014.pdf
  5. Pol E., Ville S. Social innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2009, vol. 38, iss. 6, pp. 878–885. URL: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
  6. Chalmers D. Social Innovation: An Exploration of the Barriers Faced by Innovating Organizations in the Social Economy. Local Economy, 2012, vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 17–34. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094212463677
  7. Heiscala R. Social Innovations: Structural and Power Perspectives. In: Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007, pp. 52–79.
  8. Minks M. Social Innovation : New Solutions to Social Problems. Georgetown University Washington, D.C., April 11, 2011, 80 p. URL: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/553359/minksMichaelLee.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  9. Phills J., Deiglmeier K., Miller D. Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2008, no. 6, pp. 33–43. URL: https://ssir.org/images/articles/2008FA_feature_phills_deiglmeier_miller.pdf
  10. Amable B. Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production. Discussion Paper FS I 99-309, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 1999, 36 p. URL: http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/12915/ssoar-1999-amable-institutional_complementarity_and_diversity_of.pdf?sequence=1
  11. Battistella C., Nonino F. Open Innovation Web-Based Platforms: The Impact of Different Forms of Motivation on Collaboration. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 2012, vol. 14, iss. 4, pp. 557–575. URL: https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2012.14.4.557
  12. Koch P., Hauknes J. On Innovation in the Public Sector. NIFU STEP, Oslo, 2005, 102 p. URL: https://ep.bib.mdh.se/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsref&AN=IPSSPR.KOCH.NIFUSTEP.BJJF&site=eds-live
  13. Sang M., Hwang T., Choi D. Open Innovation in the Public Sector of Leading Countries. Management Decision, 2012, 22 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235260881_Open_innovation_in_the_public_sector_of_leading_countries doi: 10.1108/00251741211194921
  14. Popov E., Stoffers J., Omonov Z., Veretennikova A. Analysis of Civic Initiatives: Multiparameter Classification of Social Innovations. American Journal of Applied Science, 2016, vol. 13, iss. 11, pp. 1136–1148. URL: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.1136.1148
  15. Sachs J.D. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York, The Penguin Press, 2005, 448 p.
  16. Boettke P.J., Rathbone A. Civil Society, Social Entrepreneurship, and Economic Calculation: Towards a Political Economy of the Philanthropic Enterprise. In: Working Paper 8, The Philanthropic Enterprise, 2002, 26 p. URL: http://www.conversationsonphilanthropy.org/wp-content/uploads/boettkerathbone-1.pdf
  17. Prahalad C.K. The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits. Revised Edition. Wharton School Publishing, 2004, 423 p.
  18. Simanis E., Hart S. The Base of the Pyramid Protocol: Toward Next Generation BoP Strategy. Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise, Johnson School of Management Cornell University, Ithaca, 2008, 57 p. URL: https://www.johnson.cornell.edu/portals/32/sge/docs/BoP_Protocol_2nd_ed.pdf
  19. Menyashev R., Polishchuk L. Does Social Capital Have Economic Payoff in Russia? Moscow, HSE Publ., 2011, 44 p. URL: https://isc.hse.ru/data/2011/03/31/1211874471/WP10_2011_01f.pdf
  20. Fafchamps M. Development and Social Capital. Journal of Development Studies, 2006, vol. 42, iss. 7, pp. 1180–1198. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380600884126
  21. Dorward A., Kydd J., Morrison J., Poulton C. Institutions, Markets and Economic Co-ordination: Linking Development Policy to Theory and Praxis. Development and Change, 2003, vol. 36, iss. 1, pp. 1–25.
  22. Mulgan G. The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2006, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 145–162. URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.14 doi: 10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
  23. Lettice F., Parekh M. The Social Innovation Process: Themes, Challenges and Implications for Practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 2010, vol. 51, iss. 1, pp. 139–158. URL: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.033133
  24. Young D.R., Lecy J.D. Defining the Universe of Social Enterprise: Competing Metaphors. Voluntas, 2014, vol. 25, iss. 5, pp. 1307–1332. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9396-z
  25. Tirole J. Market Power and Regulation. Economic Sciences Prize Committee of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2014, 54 p. URL: http://www.ecgi.org/documents/sciback_ek_en_14.pdf
  26. Menard C. The Economics of Hybrid Organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2004, vol. 160, pp. 345–376. URL: http://www.dse.univr.it/documenti/OccorrenzaIns/matdid/matdid425733.pdf
  27. Cressey P., Totterdill P., Exton R., Terstriep J. Stimulating, Resourcing and Sustaining Social Innovation: Towards a New Mode of Public Policy Production and Implementation. SIMPACT Working Paper Series, 2015, vol. 3.
  28. Tambovtsev V.L. [The State as Initiator of Development of Civil Society]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' = Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2007, no. 2, pp. 69–77. URL: http://opuo.ru/wp-content/uploads/drupal/nko_doc/gosudarstvo_kak_iniciator_razvitiya_go.pdf (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9438 (Online)
ISSN 2073-8005 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 4
December 2017

Archive