Importance This article considers the possibility of solving the issue by developing nuclear energy as an alternative source of electricity generation, which is characterized by high environmental efficiency. Objectives We conduct our own comprehensive study into nuclear energy use to solve the global climate change problem, assess nuclear energy risks through a retrospective analysis of the industry development. Methods The research involves methods of comparative analysis and an integrated survey of the research area. Results Nuclear energy has no effect on the carbon balance, which is proved by the results of a comparative analysis of various electricity generation characteristics. Nuclear energy risks were found to be artificially overestimated. Conclusions and Relevance If thoroughly designed and properly operated by high professionals, nuclear power plants are a safe source of energy, which is capable of ensuring high electricity supply, thus substantially reducing the environmental footprint. Whereas electric power plants almost do not exhaust greenhouse gas, they are able to reshape the global environmental landscape.
Guillet S., Corona C., Stoffel M. et al. Climate Response to the Samalas Volcanic Eruption in 1257 Revealed by Proxy Records. Nature Geoscience, 2017, no. 10, pp. 123–128. URL: http://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2875
Porfiriev B. Climate Change as a Major Slow-Onset Hazard to Development: An Integrated Approach to Bridge the Policy Gap. Environmental Hazards, 2015, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 187–191. URL: http://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2015.1019823
Porfir'ev B.N., Katsov V.M., Roginko S.A. Izmeneniya klimata i mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost' [Climate change and international security]. Moscow, D'ART Publ., 2011, 290 p.
Grachev V.A. [The relationship between global environmental problems, population health, and development of nuclear power industry]. Ekologiya cheloveka = Human Ecology, 2018, no. 2, pp. 9–15. (In Russ.)
Ivanov V., Tsyb A., Ivanov S., Pokrovsky V. Medical Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe in Russia: Estimation of Radiation Risks. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2004, 388 p.
Zhiznin S., Timokhov V. [Energy impact on sustainable development]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2017, no. 11, pp. 34–42. (In Russ.)
Hejazi R. Nuclear Energy: Sense or Nonsense for Environmental Challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2017, vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 693–700. URL: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.07.006
Balogh J.M., Jámbor A. Determinants of CO2 Emission: A Global Evidence. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2017, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 171–177.
Sarkisov A.A. [The phenomenon of public perception of nuclear hazards]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbPU. Estestvennye i inzhenernye nauki = St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2012, no. 3-2, pp. 9–21. (In Russ.)
Tolstikov V.G. [The nuclear catastrophe of 1957 in the Urals]. Magistra Vitae, 1999, no. 1, pp. 86–95. (In Russ.)
Penney W., Schonland B.F.J., Kay J.M. et al. Report on the Accident at Windscale No. 1 Pile on 10 October 1957. Journal or Radiological Protection, 2017, no. 37, pp. 780–796. URL: http://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa7788
Aleksakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A. et al. Krupnye radiatsionnye avarii: posledstviya i zashchitnye mery [Major radiation accidents: Consequences and protective measures]. Moscow, IzdAT Publ., 2001, 751 p.
Chernyakhovskaya Yu.V. [Greenhouse gas emissions in the electric power sector and their abatement due to Russian NPP Projects]. MPEI Vestnik, 2017, no. 3, pp. 46–52. (In Russ.)