Regional Economics: Theory and Practice

Rural municipalities in the context of the provisions of rural economics

Vol. 15, Iss. 12, DECEMBER 2017

Received: 5 October 2017

Received in revised form: 23 October 2017

Accepted: 14 November 2017

Available online: 14 December 2017


JEL Classification: P25, R10

Pages: 2255–2272

Dvoryadkina E.B. Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Belousova E.A. Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Importance This article discusses the issues of rural-type municipalities that are an integral part of the economic space of the Russian Federation and the target of research in line with the provisions of the spatial theories.
Objectives The article aims to systematize the relevant provisions of the rural economics and provide a characteristic of the study object based on the rural dimension. As well, it aims to specify the differences between the rural and agrarian economics, identify criteria for the rural area, and analyze its functions and factors that make it specific.
Methods For the study, we used the comparative method of analysis.
Results Based on the analysis performed, the article presents a definition of rural-type municipality within the framework of the rural economics. The study finds that at the post-industrial stage of the development of society, rural-type municipalities are notable for multiple functionalities, which are manifested in various aspects.
Conclusions The article describes rural-type municipalities as inhabited rural areas with rural specific characteristics, performing a variety of functions in the national economy.

Keywords: municipal district, rural settlement, agricultural economics


  1. Surnina N.M., Shishkina E.A. [The study of development specifics of macro-region's social-economic space on the basis of properties of hierarchy and fractality]. Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Journal of Ural State University of Economics, 2012, no. 6, pp. 102–107. URL: (In Russ.)
  2. Animitsa E.G., Sukhikh V.A. Prostranstvenno-vremennaya paradigma v sotsioekonomike: regional'nyi aspekt: monografiya [Spatial and time paradigm in socioeconomics: A regional aspect: a monograph]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 2007, 140 p.
  3. Animitsa E.G. Munitsipal'noe khozyaistvo i munitsipal'naya ekonomika: sushchnostno-soderzhatel'nye kharakteristiki. V kn.: Prostranstvennaya organizatsiya obshchestva [Municipal economy and municipal economics: Essential characteristics. In: Spatial organization of society]. Yekaterinburg, Ural State University of Economics Publ., 2007, pp. 15–36.
  4. Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2009, 956 p.
  5. Ricardo D. Nachala politicheskoi ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2009, 1040 p.
  6. Runge C.F. Agricultural Economics: A Brief Intellectual History. Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy Working Paper, 2006, no. WP06-1, 38 p. URL:
  7. Chayanov A.V. Krest'yanskoe khozyaistvo [The theory of peasant economy]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1989, 492 p.
  8. Tannenbaum N. The Misuse of Chayanov: “Chayanov's Rule” and Empiricist Bias in Anthropology. American Anthropologist, 1984, vol. 86, iss. 4, pp. 927–942. URL:
  9. Schulman M.D., Newman B.A. The Persistence of the Black Farmer: The Contemporary Relevance of the Lenin–Chayanov Debate. Rural Sociology, 1991, vol. 56, iss. 2, pp. 264–283. URL:
  10. Sartorius K., Sartorius B., Tollman S. et al. Rural Poverty Dynamics and Refugee Communities in South Africa: A Spatial–Temporal Model. Population, Space and Place, 2013, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 103–123. URL:
  11. Ise J. What is Rural Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1920, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 300–312. Stable URL:
  12. Syusyura D.A. Upravlenie mnogofunktsional'noi sel'skoi ekonomikoi: ot tselepolaganiya do otsenki rezul'tatov [Management of multi-functional rural economy: From objectives to results assessment]. Moscow, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2012, 256 p.
  13. Zaitseva O.O. [Rural territories as an object of management; Concept, functions, typologies]. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research, 2013, no. 6-2, pp. 416–420. URL: (In Russ.)
  14. Gazizov R.M. [Rural areas: Definition, typology, functions]. Vestnik KrasGAU = Bulletin of KrasGAU, 2013, no. 11, pp. 348–351. URL: (In Russ.)
  15. Mal'chikova D.S. [Territorial planning and function of rural areas: socio-geographical analysis]. Georgaficheskii vestnik = Geographical Bulletin, 2014, no. 3, pp. 47–53. URL: (In Russ.)
  16. Notyag A.V. [Problems of formation of investment policy in rural areas]. Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya = Science and Business: Ways of Development, 2016, no. 4, pp. 52–54. URL: (In Russ.)
  17. Michurina F.Z., Latysheva A.I., Michurin S.B. [Functional enrichment of rural areas: production, recreational and branding development paradigm]. Permskii agrarnyi vestnik = Perm Agrarian Journal, 2016, no. 2, pp. 145–153. URL: (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 15, Iss. 12
December 2017