Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Smart city: A new spiral of territorial digital inequality

Vol. 16, Iss. 2, FEBRUARY 2018

Received: 31 October 2017

Received in revised form: 4 December 2017

Accepted: 14 December 2017

Available online: 15 February 2018

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: R28

Pages: 364–378

https://doi.org/10.24891/re.16.2.364

Sharif'yanov T.F. TsTU Vostok GUP RK Krymtelekom, Kerch, Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation
timur.sharifyanov@gmail.com

ORCID id: not available

Subject This article discusses the creation of Smart city as a catalyst for urban-rural digital gap, as well as the relationship between stakeholders of urban infrastructure arising from the implementation of smart city projects.
Objectives The article purports to identify elements of a strategy aimed at reducing the polarization of the quality of life in the area and counteracting the forces that compress and limit the region's socio-economic space.
Methods The article provides an overview of the related concepts and terms associated with Smart city, such as the intelligent city, digital city, sustainable city, technology city, and the well-being city and analyzes the world's practices to implement the idea and social Smart city infrastructure.
Results The article develops theoretical bases of explosive growth of data generation of digital interaction and defines influence of these data on models of consumer behavior and compression of social and economic space. It represents a scheme of digital interaction of households, consumers, elements of social infrastructure, service sphere through information and communication interface, and offers a developed complex criterion of territorial digital alignment.
Relevance The results of the research can be used in the implementation of the concept of Smart City by the relevant consortium and local governments to take measures on territorial digital alignment, developers of Smart city technical means, and the telecom industry actors.

Keywords: smart city, intelligent city, digital divide

References:

  1. Yigitcanlar T., Velibeyoglu K., Martinez‐Fernandez C. Rising Knowledge Cities: The Role of Urban Knowledge Precincts. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2008, vol. 12, iss. 5, pp. 8–20. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810902902
  2. Ishida T. Digital City Kyoto: Social Information Infrastructure for Everyday Life. Communications of the ACM, 2002, vol. 45, iss. 7, pp. 76–81. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/514236.514238
  3. Bătăgan L. Smart Cities and Sustainability Models. Informatica Economică, 2011, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 80–87. URL: http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/59/07%20-%20Batagan.pdf
  4. Light J. Invented Edens: Techno-Cities of the Twentieth Century (review). Technology and Culture, 2009, vol. 50, iss. 2, pp. 481–483. URL: https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.0.0265
  5. Kandt J., Chang S.-S., Yip P.S.F., Burdett R. The Spatial Pattern of Premature Mortality in Hong Kong: How Does it Relate to Public Housing? Urban Studies, 2016, vol. 54, iss. 5, pp. 1211–1234. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015620341
  6. Caragliu A., Del Bo C. Smartness and European Urban Performance: Assessing the Local Impacts of Smart Urban Attributes. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2012, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 97–113. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660323
  7. Finger M., Razaghi M. Conceptualizing “Smart Cities”. Informatik Spektrum, 2016, November, pp. 1–8.
  8. Dameri R.P. Smart City Definition, Goals and Performance. In: Smart City Implementation. Creating Economic and Public Value in Innovative Urban Systems. Series: Progress in IS. Springer International Publishing AG, 2017, pp. 1–22. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45766-6
  9. Ergazakis K., Metaxiotis K., Psarras J. Towards Knowledge Cities: Conceptual Analysis and Success Stories. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2004, vol. 8, iss. 5, pp. 5–15. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410558747
  10. Huang W., Rajamani K. et al. Scaling with Design Constraints: Predicting the Future of Big Chips. IEEE Micro, 2011, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 16–29. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/MM.2011.42
  11. Thiel P., Masters B. Оt nulya k edinitse: Kak sozdat' startap, kotoryi izmenit budushchee [Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future]. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2015, 192 p.
  12. Verhoog R., Finger M. Governing Energy Transitions: Transition Goals in the Swiss Energy Sector. In: Dorsman A., Arslan-Ayaydin Ö., Karan M. (eds) Energy and Finance. Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 107–121. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32268-1_7
  13. Finger M., Crettenand N., Kenfack J. Towards Becoming an Emerging Country with a Performing Electricity Sector: The Case of Cameroon. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 2015, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 129–154. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/178359171501600204
  14. Finger M., Bert N., Küpfer D. The Role of Regulation in Preparing Transport for the Future. In: Research for Tran Committee – The World is Changing. Transport, Too. European Parliament's Committee on Transport and Tourism, 2015, pp. 77–122. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/563424/IPOL_STU%282016%29563424_EN.pdf
  15. Blythe P.T. Improving Public Transport Ticketing through Smart Cards. Municipal Engineer, 2004, vol. 157, iss. 1, pp. 47–54. URL: https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.2004.157.1.47
  16. Dzyaloshinskii I.M. Ekologiya mediasredy: eticheskie aspekty [Ecology of mass media: Ethical aspects]. Moscow, APK i PPRO Publ., 2016, 170 p.
  17. Eckhoff D., Wagner I. Privacy in the Smart City – Applications, Technologies, Challenges and Solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2017, vol. PP, iss. 99. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2748998
  18. Finger M., Crettenand N., Lemstra W. The Alignment Framework. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 2015, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 89–105. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/178359171501600202
  19. Portmann E., Finger M. Smart Cities – Ein Überblick! HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2015, vol. 52, iss. 4, pp. 470–481. URL: https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-015-0150-4
  20. Lappo G.M. Geografiya gorodov [Geography of Cities]. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 1997, 480 p.
  21. Kuznetsov Yu.A., Markova S.E. [Some aspects of digital inequality rating of the RF regions]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2014, no. 32, pp. 2–13. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nekotorye-aspekty-kolichestvennoy-otsenki-urovnya-tsifrovogo-neravenstva-regionov-rossiyskoy-federatsii (In Russ.)
  22. Sharif'yanov T.F., Gainanov D.A. [A model to bridge the digital divide in small remote locations through public-private partnership]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2016, no. 8, pp. 19–32. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modeli-preodoleniya-tsifrovogo-neravenstva-v-malyh-udalennyh-naselennyh-punktah-na-osnove-gosudarstvenno-chastnogo-partnerstva (In Russ.)
  23. Ragnedda M. The Third Digital Divide. A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. London, New York, Routledge, 2017, 128 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 6
June 2018

Archive