Importance Russian cities and towns are differentiated not only by population size, but also by a number of other indicators. This fact necessitates the development of a city typology system. Objectives The aim of the study is to develop a set of criteria for typology of Russian cities. Methods The study draws on methods of grouping, classification, systems and complex analysis, expert assessment. Results The paper distinguishes criteria of Russian cities classification, namely population size, relation to the State border, distance from the city having million plus population or the principal city, population density, type of economy, city function. Russia does not have cities with population ranging from 2,000 to 5,000 thousand people. High and above-average density of population is observed in the Moscow oblast, in Moscow it is above-average. Conclusions Highly concentrated urban agglomeration is around Moscow. A special type of towns – monotowns – are numerous in Russia. The study may serve as a theoretical basis for developing recommendations on reducing inter- and intraregional differentiation in Russia.
Keywords: typology, city, town, typology, criteria
Christaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1966, 230 р.
Moomaw R.L., Shatter A.M.Urbanization and Economic Development: A Bias toward Large Cities? Journal of Urban Economics, 1996, vol. 40, iss. 1, pp. 13–37. URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.0021
Nakamura R. Agglomeration Economies in Urban Manufacturing Industries: A Case of Japanese Cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 1985, vol. 17, iss. 1, pp. 108–124. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(85)90040-3
Eaton J., Eckstein Z. Cities and Growth: Theory and Evidence from France and Japan. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1997, vol. 27, iss. 4-5, рр. 443–474. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(97)80005-1
Li F., Liu X., Hu D. et al. Measurement Indicators and an Evaluation Approach for Assessing Urban Sustainable Development: A Case Study for China's Jining City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009, vol. 90, iss. 3-4, рр. 134–142. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.022
Capello R., Faggian A. An Economic-Ecological Model of Urban Growth and Urban Externalities: Empirical Evidence from Italy. Ecological Economics, 2002, vol. 40, iss. 2, pp. 181–198. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00252-X
Semenov Tyan-Shansky V.P. Gorod i derevnya v Evropeiskoi Rossii. Ser.: Zapiski Imperatorskogo russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva po otdeleniyu Statistiki [City and Village in European Russia: An Essay on Economic Geography. Ser.: Proceedings of Imperial Russian Geographical Society, Statistics Department]. St. Petersburg, Tip. V.F. Kirshbauma Publ., 1910, 212 p.
Limonov L.E., Nesena M.V. [Typology of large cities of Russia by economic structure]. Izvestiya russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva = Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society,2015, vol. 147, iss. 6, pp. 59–77. (In Russ.)
Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I. [Cities and countryside in Russia: Their state and correlation]. Regional'nye issledovaniya = Regional Studies,2010, no. 2, pp. 42–57. URL: http://media.geogr.msu.ru/RI/RI_2010_02(28).pdf (In Russ.)
Zubarevich N.V. Regiony Rossii: neravenstvo, krizis, modernizatsiya: monografiya [Regions of Russia: Inequality, crisis, modernization: a monograph]. Moscow, Nezavisimyi institut sotsial'noi politiki Publ., 2010, 160 p. URL: http://www.socpol.ru/publications/pdf/Regions_2010.pdf
Lyubovnyi V.Ya., Kuznetsova G.Yu., Vlasova N.I., Grivina I.V. Puti aktivizatsii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya monoprofil'nykh gorodov Rossii: monografiya [Ways to boost social and economic development of monocities of Russia: a monograph]. Moscow, Moskovskii obshchestvennyi nauchnyi fond Publ., 2004, 224 p.
Turgel' I.D. Monofunktsional'nye goroda Rossii: ot vyzhivaniya k ustoichivomu razvitiyu: monografiya [Monofunctional cities of Russia: From survival to sustainable development: a monograph]. Yekaterinburg, UrAPA Publ., 2010, 519 с.