Importance The article presents principles of development and implementation results of the system of Multifactorial Economic Analysis of National Power Markets. Objectives The study focuses on development of the system of Multifactorial Economic Analysis of National Power Markets and its further application to the national economies of the CIS. Methods The paper rests on economic and mathematical methods and analysis of official statistics. Results The fragmentation of the USSR synchronous zone transformed a number of energy security challenges. The cooperation between countries changed according to capitalist principles. The main imbalances were identified. That revealed a number of differences, like economic situation, level of resource self-sufficiency, and infrastructure. The final results are adjusted based on the criteria of institutional development. Conclusions The reliability of the energy system is improved through the integration of power sectors that also encourages the development of cross border economic and political cooperation. Furthermore, the supranational and national priorities underpin the intercountry commercial and technological infrastructure development, which is limited by energy security concepts. The common electricity market serves as a basis for interstate commercial infrastructure. Reintegration that relies on principles of parity in the collective decision making process is realized through the creation of the common electricity market. The above mentioned concept provides instruments to monitor and detect local disproportions in order to maximize the profits of the integration.
Keywords: energy security, CIS, integration processes
Hu J., Harmsen R., Crijns-Graus W. et al. Identifying Barriers to Large-Scale Integration of Variable Renewable Electricity into the Electricity Market: A Literature Review of Market Design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, vol. 81, part 2, pp. 2181–2195. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.028
De Menezes L.M., Houllier M.A. Reassessing the Integration of European Electricity Markets: a Fractional Cointegration Analysis. Energy Economics, 2016, vol. 53, pp. 132–150. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.021
Hawker G., Bell K., Gill S. Electricity Security in the European Union—The Conflict between National Capacity Mechanisms and the Single Market. Energy Research & Social Science,2017, vol.24, pp. 51–58. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.009
China Energy Policy, Laws and Regulation Handbook. Vol. 1. Strategic Information and Basic Laws. Ser.: World Business and Investment Library. Lulu.com, 2015, 308 p.
Keppler J.H. Rationales for Capacity Remuneration Mechanisms: Security of Supply Externalities and Asymmetric Investment Incentives. Energy Policy, 2017, vol. 105, pp. 562–570. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.008
De Villemeur E.B., Pineau P.-O. Regulation and Electricity Market Integration: When Trade Introduces Inefficiencies. Energy Economics,2012, vol. 34, iss. 2, pp. 529–535. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.004
Grimm V., Martin A., Schmidt M. et al. Transmission and Generation Investment in Electricity Markets: The Effects of Market Splitting and Network Fee Regimes. European Journal of Operational Research,2016, vol. 254, iss. 2, pp. 493–509. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.044