+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

EU cohesion policy and European clean energy transition

Vol. 16, Iss. 9, SEPTEMBER 2018

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 11 July 2018

Received in revised form: 24 July 2018

Accepted: 8 August 2018

Available online: 14 September 2018

Subject Heading: SPATIAL ECONOMICS

JEL Classification: Q43, Q48

Pages: 1612–1624

https://doi.org/10.24891/re.16.9.1612

Zimakov A.V. Section of EU Studies, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS), Moscow, Russian Federation
zimakov@newmail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6574-6258

Subject This article deals with the clean energy transition process in Europe and the interaction of EU energy and cohesion policies within its context.
Objectives The article aims to study and assess the impact of targeting of EU energy policy on the implementation of regional policy measures.
Methods The research involves the systems approach, comparative analysis, and the process tracking technique.
Results The article identifies certain measures of EU cohesion policy the implementation of which provides support for clean energy transition objectives. In particular, this pertains to regional development project financing by European Structural and Investment Funds, namely, the Cohesion Fund and the European Regional Development Fund. As well, the article shows that the goals and results of a number of measures of regional and energy policies of the Community have much in common.
Conclusions Achieving the goals of greening the economy and energy in particular is a challenge. Its solution requires the cooperation of related areas, first of all, regional policy. The priority of the objectives of greening in project financing at the regional level and the alignment of structural imbalances in the regions resulting from transformational processes in the energy sector are utterly significant.

Keywords: EU energy, clean energy transition, EU cohesion policy, structural funds, green energy, grid infrastructure

References:

  1. Kuznetsov A.V. Regional'naya politika stran ES: monografiya [The EU cohesion policy: a monograph]. Moscow, IMEMO RAS Publ., 2009, 230 p.
  2. Kaveshnikov N. [Institutional and political development of the European Union: Systemic crisis and transformation options]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2017, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 14–24. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Kaveshnikov N. [European Union's climate and energy strategy]. Sovremennaya Evropa = Contemporary Europe, 2015, no. 1, pp. 93–103. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Zimakov A.V. [Is there any future for coal power plants in Europe?]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2017, no. 5, pp. 130–150. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  5. Lavrovskii B.L., Murzov I.A., Tyagnibeda A.V., Uvarova E.V. [The EU's cohesion policy: latest developments]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2011, no. 1, pp. 30–48. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  6. Bederak D.A. [Evolution of the regional cohesion policy in the European Union]. Upravlenets, 2014, no. 2, pp. 33–38. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Redesigning and Reforming European Regional Policy. International Regional Science Review, 2013, vol. 36, iss. 3, pp. 424–445. URL: Link
  8. Forzieri G., Bianchi A., Marin Herrera M.A. et al. Resilience of Large Investments and Critical Infrastructures in Europe to Climate Change. Ispra, Joint Research Centre, 2016, 38 p. URL: Link
  9. Zimakov A.V. Zachem Gretsii tranzit energoresursov? V kn.: Sovremennaya Gretsiya v mirovoi ekonomike i politike [Why should Greece transit energy? In: Modern Greece in the world economy and politics]. Moscow, IMEMO RAS Publ., 2013, pp. 179–184.
  10. Kuznetsov A.V., Olenchenko V.A. [Construction of transport and energy networks in the Baltic region as an impetus for regional development]. Baltiiskii region = Baltic Region, 2013, no. 4, pp. 7–22. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  11. Wehnert T., Hermwille L., Mersmann F. et al. Phasing-out Coal, Reinventing European Regions. An Analysis of EU Structural Funding in four European Coal Regions. Wuppertal Institute, 2018, 64 p. URL: Link
  12. Manowska A., Tobór Osadnik K., Wyganowska M. Economic and Social Aspects of Restructuring Polish Coal Mining: Focusing on Poland and the EU. Resources Policy, 2017, vol. 52, pp. 192–200. URL: Link
  13. Budanova I.A. [Euroregions as actors of world politics]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2013, no. 3, pp. 57–63. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  14. Drăgan G. Continuity versus Discontinuity in the 2014–2020 EU Cohesion Policy. In: Pascariu G.C., Pedrosa Da Silva Duarte M.A. (eds). Core-Periphery Patterns Across the European Union. Bingley, Emerald Publishing, 2017, pp. 291–335. URL: Link
  15. Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020. Official Journal of the European Union, 2009, vol. 52, no. L140, pp. 136-148. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive