+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Monopolization of the banking system: risks and opportunities

Vol. 22, Iss. 5, FEBRUARY 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 30 July 2015

Accepted: 22 October 2015

Available online: 12 February 2016

Subject Heading: Banking

JEL Classification: L12, G01, G20

Pages: 23-35

Komolov O.O. Institute of Economics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
oleg_komolov@mail.ru

Importance The modern stage of economic development exhibits rapid processes of monopolization of the production and financial sector thus demonstrating a tendency to concentration and centralization of capital. In the financial sector, these processes have resulted in established system-relevant institutions, the activities of which became one of the causes of the 2008 financial crisis.
     Objectives The study aims to review the nature of processes of the banking sector monopolization and assess the phenomenon through evaluating its risks and opportunities for economic development in the interests of the entire society.
     Methods I reviewed the case of the banking sector of the U.S. financial system through analyzing the statistical series and the history of the policy of regulatory authorities, and defined the impact of monopolization processes on the sector’s efficiency.
     Results On the one hand, the concentration of bank capital helps increase profitability and soundness of the sector. On the other hand, it creates conditions for economic and political domination of big financial corporations thus jeopardizing sustainable economic development. The crisis of the global financial system displayed controversies of the regulating policy of State authorities that have to save system-relevant banks using taxpayers' money through nationalization or recapitalization.
     Conclusions The banking sector monopolization is of dual nature, and this fact precludes from any categorical assessment of the phenomena, either positive or negative, while developing the public policy. The objective need to subordinate the monopoly capital to public interests enables to overcome the negative impact of economy monopolization and exploit its advantages.

Keywords: monopolies, concentration, banking sector, systemic risk, USA

References:

  1. Abalkin L.I. Problemy malogo i srednego biznesa v protsesse reformirovaniya rossiiskoi ekonomiki. V kn.: Izbrannye trudy: v 4-kh tt. T. IV. Vol'noe ekonomicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii [Problems of small and medium-sized business in the process of Russian economy transformation. In: Selecta: in 4 volumes. Vol. 4. Free Economic Society of Russia]. Moscow, OAO NPO Ekonomika Publ., 2000, 799 p.
  2. Obolenskii V. Nuzhnaya blagopriyatnaya i predskazuemaya biznes-sreda [The required favorable and predictable business environment]. Mir peremen = World of Transformations, 2015, Special issue, pp. 79–85.
  3. James E. Istoriya ekonomicheskoi mysli XX veka [Histoire la pensee economique au 20-e siecle]. Moscow, Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury Publ., 1959, 572 p.
  4. Eucken W. Osnovnye printsipy ekonomicheskoi politiki. Monografiya [Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1995, 496 p.
  5. Rhoades S.A. Bank Mergers and Industry-wide Structure, 1980–94. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC, 1996. Available at: Link.
  6. Jones K., Critchfield T. Consolidation in the U.S. Banking Industry: Is the ‘Long, Strange Trip’ About to End? FDIC Banking Review, 2005, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 31–61.
  7. Marion F. Amerikanskie banki: kontsentratsiya uskoryaetsya [Banques américaines: concentration accélérée]. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 2: Ekonomika = Social and Human Sciences. National and Foreign Literature, Series 2: Economics, 1997, no. 2, pp. 64–66.
  8. Bikker J.A., Haaf K. Competition, Concentration and Their Relationship: An Empirical Analysis of the Banking Industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2002, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2191–2214.
  9. Peirce H., Robinson I., Stratmann T. How are Small Banks Faring under Dodd-Frank? Mercatus Center at George Mason University Working Papers, 2014, no. 14-05, 105 p.
  10. Beck T., Demirgüç-Kunt A., Levine R. Bank Concentration and Crises. NBER Working Papers, 2003, no. 9921, 41 p.
  11. Luk'yanova O.P. [Processes of international and national capital concentration in multinational banks]. Services in Russia and Abroad, 2007, no. 2, pp. 108–110. (In Russ.) Available at: Link.
  12. Wheelock D. Banking Industry Consolidation and Market Structure: Impact of the Financial Crisis and Recession. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 2011, November/December, pp. 419–438.
  13. Jones K., Nguyen C. Increased Concentration in Banking: Megabanks and their Implications for Deposit Insurance. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 2005, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 1–42. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-8008.2005.00079.x
  14. Silber W. Volcker: the Triumph of Persistence. New York, Bloomsbury Press, 2013, 464 p.
  15. Moe T., Solheim J., Vale S. The Norwegian Banking Crisis. Norges Banks Skriftserie, Occasional Papers, 2004, no. 33, 252 p.
  16. Grinberg R.S. Svoboda i spravedlivost'. Rossiiskie soblazny lozhnogo vybora [Freedom and justice. Russian temptations of a false choice]. Moscow, Magistr, INFRA-M Publ., 2012, 416 p.
  17. Reiss D. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Privatizing Profit and Socializing Loss. Lessons from the Financial Crisis: Insights and Analysis from Today's Leading Minds. Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Papers, 2010, no. 156.
  18. Miller M., Zhangy L., Li H. When Bigger isn’t Better: Bailouts and Bank Reform. Oxford Economic Papers, 2013, no. 65, Issue Suppl. 1, pp. i7–i41. doi: 10.1093/oep/gps054

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive