Finance and Credit
 

The role of the Bank of Russia in risk management of insurance companies

Vol. 24, Iss. 3, MARCH 2018

Received: 27 December 2017

Received in revised form: 24 January 2018

Accepted: 8 February 2018

Available online: 29 March 2018

Subject Heading: Insurance

JEL Classification: G22

Pages: 679—690

https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.24.3.679

Larionov A.V. National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation
alarionov@hse.ru

ORCID id: 0000-0001-8657-6809

Subject The article investigates the reasons for license withdrawal from Russian insurance companies.
Objectives The study aims to highlight major factors impacting the stability of insurance companies in Russia and consider opportunities of the Bank of Russia to influence the insurance market development.
Methods The Russian regulatory and legal framework for insurance market regulation and supervision served as a source of analysis. Initial computation involved binary and linear regressions.
Results The study reveals focal points of the Bank of Russia policy for insurance market development. I analyze major determinants of insurance companies' success. The study confirms the assumption that insurance companies in Russia are mostly affected by risks associated with insurance, rather than investing activities. However, in the event of investment potential development, this source of risk is also significant enough.
Conclusions The Bank of Russia needs to monitor the activities of insurance companies. It is necessary to build a model to predict violations of financial stability of insurance companies and pre-emptively identify and support the most vulnerable insurance companies.

Keywords: insurance, risks, insurance companies, financial stability, regulator, Bank of Russia

References:

  1. Sharpe I.G., Stadnik A. Financial Distress in Australian General Insures. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2007, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 377—399.
  2. Masino M.N., Larionov A.V. [Methodology for risk management process organization in the payment system]. Upravlenie finansovymi riskami, 2016, no. 4, pp. 288—297. (In Russ.)
  3. Biryukova O.V. [Russia's participation in the international insurance market]. Vestnik Universiteta, 2010, no. 9, pp. 129—131. (In Russ.)
  4. Reshetnikova D. [Factors of Public Assessment of Civil Servants’ Performance in Providing Civil Services]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues, 2016, no. 2, pp. 131—164. URL: https://vgmu.hse.ru/en/2016–2/185040575.html (In Russ.)
  5. Peralta G., Crisóstomo R. Financial Contagion with Spillover Effects: A Multiplex Network Approach. European Systemic Risk Board Working Paper Series, 2016, no. 32. URL: https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/wp/esrbwp32.en.pdf?c66a5efa018afcde60f4d153139e48c6
  6. Stoyanova R., Gründl H. Solvency II: A Driver for Mergers and Acquisitions? The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2014, vol. 39, iss. 3, pp. 417—439.
  7. Liebenberg A.P., Sommer D.W. Effects of Corporate Diversification: Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2008, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 893—919.
  8. Cummins D.J., Xie X. Mergers and Acquisitions in the US Property-Liability Insurance Industry: Productivity and Efficiency Effects. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 30—55.
  9. Bernal J., Cepeda F., Ortega F. Estimating the Contribution of Liquidity Sources in the Colombian Large-Value Real-Time Gross Settlement Payment System: A preliminary approach. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 2012, vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 159—182.
  10. McAndrews J., Trundle J. New Payment System Designs: Causes and Consequences. Bank of England Financial Stability Review, 2001, December, pp. 127—136.
  11. Zhang L., Nielson N. Solvency Analysis and Prediction in Property-Casualty Insurance: Incorporating economic and market predictors. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2015, vol. 82, iss. 1, pp. 97—124.
  12. Cole R., Wu Q. Is Hazard or Probit More Accurate in Predicting Financial Distress? Evidence from U.S. bank failures. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 2009, pp. 1—46.
  13. Lanine G., Vennet R.V. Failure Prediction in the Russian Bank Sector with Logit and Trait Recognition Models. Expert Systems with Applications, 2006, vol. 30, iss. 3, pp. 463—478.
  14. Rajan U., Seru A., Vig V. The Failure of Models That Predict Failure: Distance, Incentives, and Defaults. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, vol. 115, iss. 2, pp. 237—260.
  15. Levando D.V. A Survey on Strategic Market Games. Economic Annals, 2012, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 63—106.
  16. Betz F., Opricӑ S., Peltonen T.A., Sarlin P. Predicting Distress in European Banks. ECB Working Paper Series, 2013, October, no. 1597, 34 p.
  17. Shubik M., Tsomocos D.P. A Strategic Market Game with Seigniorage Costs of Fiat Money. Economic Theory, 2002, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 187—201.
  18. Kalgin A., Parfenteva D., Podolskiy D., Campbell J. Performance Management and Job-Goal Alignment: A Conditional Process Model of Turnover Intention in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2018, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 65—80.
  19. Ionannidou V.P. Does Monetary Policy Affect the Central Bank's Role in Bank Supervision? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2005, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 58—85.
  20. Kolari J., Glennon D., Shin H., Caputo M. Predicting Large US Commercial Bank Failures. Journal of Economics and Business, 2002, vol. 54, iss. 4, pp. 361—387.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 24, Iss. 3
March 2018

Archive