International Accounting
 

On the impact of IFRS on results of financial analysis of organizations

Vol. 20, Iss. 22, NOVEMBER 2017

Received: 10 April 2017

Received in revised form: 21 April 2017

Accepted: 4 May 2017

Available online: 29 November 2017

Subject Heading: INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING

JEL Classification: G32

Pages: 12881303

https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.20.22.1288

Gordeeva O.G. Cheboksary Cooperative Institute (Branch) of Russian University of Cooperation, Cheboksary, Russian Federation gog3@yandex.ru

Serebryakova T.Yu. Cheboksary Cooperative Institute (Branch) of Russian University of Cooperation, Cheboksary, Russian Federation tserebryakova@rucoop.ru

Importance The main disadvantage of IFRS is in subjectivity of estimates of assets and liabilities. Methods of financial analysis, and especially the permissible values of key indicators are determined in relation to financial statements generated under IFRS. However, in our country, these indicators for various purposes, including bankruptcy proceedings, are determined based on financial statements prepared under Russian Accounting Standards. The findings show that restatement of financial statements does not change conclusions about financial condition of the organization. Further investigation reveals the validity of these conclusions.
Objectives We use the data of Russian companies preparing their IFRS-based financial statements on the basis of transformation of their RAS-based financial statements to find the extent of difference in figures characterizing the financial standing of these companies under the said reporting formats.
Methods The study draws on general scientific methods, like systems approach, logical generalization, analysis, synthesis and hypothesis.
Results In the presence of material differences in financial indicators, the results of ratio analysis of financial statements prepared under RAS and IFRS enable to make the same conclusions about the financial standing.
Conclusions and Relevance The findings help focus on improving the criteria for evaluating the financial condition of domestic companies for various purposes, regardless of International Financial Reporting Standards.

Keywords: fair value, IFRS, analysis, reporting, financial statements

References:

  1. Kuter M.I., Gurskaya M.M. [A fresh approach to the tenets of L. Pacioli]. Uchet i statistika = Accounting and Statistics, 2010, vol. 2, no. 22, pp. 5258. (In Russ.)
  2. Get'man V.G., Grishkina S.N., Rozhnova O.V., Safonova I.V., Sidneva V.P. Kontseptual'nye i metodicheskie podkhody k otsenke uchetnykh ob''ektov po spravedlivoi stoimosti: monografiya [Conceptual and methodological approaches to measuring the accounting objects at fair value: a monograph]. Moscow, Ugreshskaya tipografiya Publ., 2013, 150 p.
  3. Cantrell B.W., McInnis J.M., Yust C.G. Predicting Credit Losses: Loan Fair Values versus Historical Costs. The Accounting Review, 2014, vol. 89, iss. 1, pp. 147176. URL: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50593
  4. Guthrie K., Irving J.H., Sokolowsky J. Accounting Choice and the Fair Value Option. Accounting Horizons, 2011, vol. 25, iss. 3, pp. 487510. URL: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50006
  5. Valencia A., Smith T.J., Ang J. The Effect of Noisy Fair Value Measures on Bank Capital Adequacy Ratios. Accounting Horizons, 2013, vol. 27, iss. 4, pp. 693710. URL: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50517
  6. Potekhina E.N. [Problems and ways of improving the accounting at small enterprises]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research, 2014, no. 9, part 6, pp. 13221325. (In Russ.)
  7. Laux C., Leuz C. The Crisis of Fair-Value Accounting: Making Sense of the Recent Debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2009, vol. 34, iss. 6-7, pp. 826834. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.003
  8. Fifield S., Finningham G., Fox A., Power D., Veneziani M. A Cross-Country Analysis of IFRS Reconciliation Statements. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 2011, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 2642. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/09675421111130595
  9. Griffin J.B. The Effects of Uncertainty and Disclosure on Auditors' Fair Value Materiality Decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 2014, vol. 52, iss. 5, pp. 11651193. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12059
  10. Ivashkevich V.B., Spiryagina N.S. The Responsibility for the Faithfulness of the Accounting Statements of Enterprises. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, MCSER Publishing, 2015, vol. 6, no. 1 S3, pp. 357360. URL: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1s3p357
  11. Sukharev I.R., Sukhareva O.A. [Disadvantages of IFRS: inventory valuation]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, 2016. no. 1, pp. 2330. (In Russ.)
  12. Shishova E.V. [Generally accepted accounting principles and accounting at fair value]. aterialy IX Vserossiiskoi konferentsii Aktual'nye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk. Chast' 2 [Proc. 9th All-Russia Sci. Conf. Topical Issues of Economics. Part 2]. Novosibirsk, Tsentr Razvitiya Nauchnogo Sotrudnichestva Publ., 2009, pp. 204209.
  13. Kuz'menko O.A., Novoselova M.A. [Fair value measurement]. Materialy IV Vserossiiskoi zaochnoi elektronnoi nauchnoi konferentsii Problemy ucheta, analiza, audita i nalogooblozheniya [Proc. 4th All-Russ. Sci. e-Conf. Problems of Accounting, Analysis, Audit and Taxation]. 2013. URL: http://econf.rae.ru/article/7665
  14. Fargher N., Zhang J. Changes in the Measurement of Fair Value: Implications for Accounting Earnings. Accounting Forum, vol. 38, iss. 3, pp. 184199. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.06.002
  15. Kozmenkova S.V., Pryntsev M.N. [The main scientific approaches to the definition of the financial stability concept]. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem Problemy i perspektivy regional'nogo razvitiya [Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. Problems and Prospects for Regional Development]. Nizhny Novgorod, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod Publ., 2013, pp. 108113.
  16. Serebryakova T.Yu. [A methodology for integrated accounting and control]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, 2016, no. 1, pp. 3139. (In Russ.)
  17. Serebryakova T.Yu. [Integrated accounting and reporting: The institutional approach]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, 2016, no. 2, pp. 2433. (In Russ.)
  18. Shegurova V.P., Leushina E.V. [Comparative characteristics of different methods to rate financial standing of industrial enterprises]. Materialy III mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii Ekonomicheskaya nauka i praktika [Proc. 3rd Int. Sci. Conf. Economic Science and Practice]. Chita, Molodoi uchenyi Publ., 2014, pp. 8084.
  19. Khriplivyi F.P., Khriplivyi A.F. [A comparative analysis of methods for assessing the financial condition of the organization]. Scientific Journal of KubSAU, 2012, no. 81. (In Russ.) URL: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2012/07/pdf/21.pdf
  20. Rizoev F.U. [Classification of methods to evaluate the financial standing of commercial organizations]. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika = Economy and Business: Theory and Practice, 2015, no. 10, pp. 117121. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 23
December 2017

Archive