+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Territorial-branch planning in terms of the implementation of reshoring and re-industrialization strategies

Vol. 11, Iss. 10, MARCH 2015

Available online: 8 March 2015

Subject Heading: MECHANISMS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-10

Razvadovskaya Yu.V. Center for Scientific Research of Instrumental, Mathematical and Intellec-tual Resources in the Economy, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federa-tion
yvrazvadovskaya@sfedu.ru

Lozhnikova A.V. Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
tfg@mail.ru

Shevchenko I.K. Center for Scientific Research of Instrumental, Mathematical and Intellectual Resources in the Economy, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
ikshevchenko@mail.ru

Importance Change of the next stage of technical and economic development is accompanied by a structural transformation of the global economy, in particular the regular movement of global financial capital, as well as significant changes in the siting of production facilities. In search of new sources of competitive advantages, the global industrial capital is moving to the countries that are able to reduce production costs. In these conditions, the developed and developing States use various methods of territorial sectoral planning that in developed countries, aim at the return of industrial production, and in developing ones, at the rehabilitation and modernization of the existing scientific and industrial complexes.
     Objectives The main purpose of the article is to identify methods of long-term territorial and sectoral planning in the context of structural transformation of the global economy in developed and developing countries, as well as an analysis of the prospects of recovery of industrial pro-duction in Russia. To achieve the goal, the authors are addressing a number of challenges, in-cluding the systematization of theoretical bases of reshoring and reindustrialization, mapping of potential projects of reindustrialization in Russia.
     Methods The methodological basis of the study was the theory of territorial and sectoral plan-ning. For the analysis of promising reindustrialization projects, the authors use the method of mapping.
     Results The authors show that reshoring trends are typical of the developed countries, and they do not influence the Russian economy directly. In Russian practice, the territorial-branch plan-ning is to restore scientific and production associations, which were created during the period of the planned economy, what is proved by the mapping of potential reindustrialization projects.
     Conclusions and Relevance The authors conclude that in the context of structural instability of the economy, Governments of both developed and developing countries are increasing the indus-trial potential of the economy; the tools to implement this policy is either reshoring of industrial production, or its restoring on a restructuring of the existing scientific and industrial complexes. In Russian practice, the remediation of the industry in the long term is not capable to ensure the accelerated development of industry clusters.

Keywords: territorial and sectoral planning, reshoring, reindustrialization, mapping, industrial parks, clusters, research and production association, developed and developing countries, Russia, industrial-innovation potential

References:

  1. Razvadovskaya Yu.V., Khanina A.V., Shevchenko I.K., Lozhnikova A.V. Ekonomiko-geograficheskie determinanty reindustrializatsii i reshoringa v promyshlenno razvitykh i razvivayushchikhsya stranakh [The economic and geographic determinants of reindustrialization and reshoring in industrialized and developing countries]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  2. Razvadovskaya Yu.V., Shevchenko I.K. Ekonomiko-matematicheskii analiz vliyaniya gosudarstvennykh investitsii i PII [An economic-mathematical analysis of the impact of public investment and FDI]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2014, no. 47, pp. 14–22.
  3. Sadkov V.G., Mashegov P.N., Uvarova A.Ya. et al. Industrial'nye parki kak element inovatsionno-investitsionnoi infrastruktury regiona: modnaya tendentsiya ili novoe kachestvo institutov territorial'nogo razvitiya? [Industrial parks as an innovation-and-investment infrastructure of the region: fashion trend or a new quality of institutions of territorial development?]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional economics: theory and practice, 2014, no. 2, pp. 12–20.
  4. Sukharev O.S. Ekonomicheskaya politika reindustrializatsii Rossii: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya [The economic policy of the reindustrialization of Russia: possibilities and limitations]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2013, no. 24, pp. 2–25.
  5. Sukharev O.S., Strizhakova E.N. Industrial'naya politika i razvitie promyshlennykh system [Industrial policy and the development of industrial systems]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 15, pp. 2–22.
  6. Shakhovskaya L.S., Matkovskaya Ya.S. Reshoring: problemy i perspektivy dlya Rossii i Kitaya [Reshoring: problems and prospects for Russia and China]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 36, pp. 42–52.
  7. Adelmann B. American׳s reshoring of jobs is accelerating. Available at: Link.
  8. Benito G.R.G., Welch L.S. De-internationalization. Management International Review, 1997, no. 37, pp. 7–25.
  9. Fink C., Mattoo A., Neagu I.C. Assessing the impact of communication costs on international trade. Available at: Link.
  10. Holz R. An investigation into off-shoring and back-shoring in the German automotive industry. University of Wales, Swansea, 2009.
  11. Kinkel S. Trends in production relocation and back-shoring activities: changing patterns in the course of the global economic crisis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2012, no. 32, pp. 696–720.
  12. Kinkel S., Maloca S. Drivers and antecedents of manufacturing off-shoring and back-shoring – a German perspective. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 2009, no. 15, pp. 154–165.
  13. Pisano G.P., Shih W.C. Does America really need manufacturing? Harvard Business Review, 2012, no. 90, pp. 94–102.
  14. Regalado A. Made in America, again. Available at: Link.
  15. Sirkin H.L. Fears of a U.S. manufacturing-skills gap in the near term are overblown. Available at: Link.
  16. Williamson O.E. The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New York, 1985.
  17. Here, there and anywhere. Available at: Link.
  18. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2013. Global value chains: investment and trade for development. World Investment Report 2013, Geneva, Switzerland.
  19. Majority of large manufacturers are now planning or considering “re-shoring” from China to the U.S. Global value chains: investment and trade for development. Available at: Link.
  20. Global workforce crisis puts $10 trillion at risk in world economy. Global value chains: investment and trade for development. Available at: Link.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 5
May 2024

Archive