+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Competitive mechanisms for cost reduction in the Russian defense industry: effectiveness and risks

Vol. 11, Iss. 45, DECEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 5 August 2015

Accepted: 19 August 2015

Available online: 16 December 2015

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE STATE

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-17

Klochkov V.V. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
vlad_klochkov@mail.ru

Selezneva I.E. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
ir.seleznewa2016@yandex.ru

Importance The article focuses on issues of ensuring the competitiveness in placing State defense orders and purchasing spare parts needed for products of the Russian defense industry.
     Objectives The research formulates the policy of order placement and pricing for purchased products, which would sustain the competition among suppliers and, ultimately, minimize the procurement costs in the long run.
     Methods To optimize procurement policies of customers for the defense industry products and spare parts, we propose a new economic and mathematic model of bilateral oligopoly with the random ultimate number of sellers and buyers.
     Results Based on the proposed model, we made parametric computations using the model coefficients applicable to the aviation industry. We estimated the minimum price, which customers expect from competitive suppliers to ensure the competition in the long run.
     Conclusions and Relevance The strict procurement policy, which reduces customers' costs, will overwhelm competition in the strategic prospects, with the minimum procurement prices being attainable when the asking price exceeds the breakeven point. We make a nontrivial conclusion that the expected procurement price can reduce because the stable number of orders enables a lot of competing suppliers to work productively and gain profit.

Keywords: military-industrial complex, competition, monopoly, optimal pricing, bilateral oligopoly, closed queuing system

References:

  1. Baibakova E.Yu., Klochkov V.V. Ekonomicheskie aspekty formirovaniya setevykh organizatsionnykh struktur v naukoemkoi promyshlennosti [Economic aspects of network organizational structures formation in the Russian science-intensive industry]. Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami = Large-Scale Systems Control, 2010, vol. 30.1, Network Models in Management, pp. 697–721.
  2. Alchian A. Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production. Econometrica, 1963, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 679–694.
  3. Benkard C.L. A Dynamic Analysis of the Market for Wide-Bodied Commercial Aircraft. Review of Economic Studies, 2004, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 581–611.
  4. Udalov K.G., Komissarov D.S. Samolet Boing – 747: monografiya [Boeing 747: a monograph]. Moscow, AVIKO PRESS Publ., 1994, 96 p.
  5. Il'in V.E., Levin M.A. Istrebiteli [Fighters]. Moscow, Viktoriya AST Publ., 1996, 288 p.
  6. Tirole J. Rynki i rynochnaya vlast': teoriya organizatsii promyshlennosti [The theory of industrial organization]. St. Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 2002, 780 p.
  7. Rubinstein A. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica, 1982, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 97–109.
  8. Collard-Wexler A., Gowrisankaran G., Lee R.S. Bargaining in Bilateral Oligopoly: An Alternating Offers’ Representation of the “Nash-in-Nash Solution”. NBER Working Paper Series, WP 20641, 2014, 47 p.
  9. Dickson A., Hartley R. Bilateral Oligopoly and Quantity Competition. Economic Theory, 2013, vol. 32, iss. 3, pp. 979–1004.
  10. Hendricks K., McAfee Preston R. A Theory of Bilateral Oligopoly. Economic Inquiry, 2010, vol. 48, iss. 2, pp. 391–414.
  11. Funaki Y., Houba H., Motchenkova E. Market Power in Bilateral Oligopoly Markets with Nonexpandable Infrastructures. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, 12-139/II, 2012, 42 p.
  12. Burenok V.M., Lavrinov G.A., Khrustalev E.Yu. Mekhanizmy upravleniya proizvodstvom produktsii voennogo naznacheniya [Mechanisms for handling military products]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006, 303 p.
  13. Lavrinov G.A., Khrustalev E.Yu. Metody prognozirovaniya tsen na produktsiyu voennogo naznacheniya [Methods for forecasting prices of military products]. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Problems of Forecasting, 2006, no. 1, pp. 87–96.
  14. Petrov D.N. Metodicheskie podkhody k otsenke stoimosti NIOKR pri formirovanii gosoboronzakaza [Methodological approaches to assessing the cost of R&D in preparing the State defense order]. Ezhegodnik VNII PVTI = Yearbook of VNIIPVTI, 2010, pp. 97–108.
  15. Taha H. Vvedenie v issledovanie operatsii [Operations Research: An Introduction]. Moscow, Vil'yams Publ., 2001, 916 p.
  16. Lee R.S., Fong K. Markov-Perfect Network Formation. An Applied Framework for Bilateral Oligopoly and Bargaining in Buyer-Seller Networks. New York University Stern School of Business Working Papers, 2013, September, 39 p. (In Russ.) Available at: Link.
  17. Inderst R., Wey Ch. Bargaining, Mergers, and Technology Choice in Bilaterally Oligopolistic Industries. RAND Journal of Economics, 2003, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
  18. Krishna V., Serrano R. Multilateral Bargaining. The Review of Economic Studies, 1996, vol. 63, iss. 1, pp. 61–80.
  19. Merlo A., Wilson C. A Stochastic Model of Sequential Bargaining with Complete Information. Econometrica, 1995, no. 63, pp. 371–399.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive