Regional Economics: Theory and Practice

Energy strategy of Russia in oil and gas export: The factor of excess transport capacity

Vol. 16, Iss. 4, APRIL 2018

Received: 20 February 2018

Received in revised form: 2 March 2018

Accepted: 12 March 2018

Available online: 14 April 2018


JEL Classification: F52, L71, Q48

Pages: 695–710

Makarova Yu.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID id: 0000-0001-5129-8175

Importance This article deals with the issues of infrastructure of oil and gas export from Russia, geography of raw materials supply and plans to expand the resource transportation network. The issue of transport overcapacity is considered in terms of the institutional characteristics of the industry, geographical aspects of the energy strategy, and the country's energy security considerations.
Objectives The article aims to analyze the energy strategy of Russia in the field of oil and gas export, as well as identify possible causes of surplus of production capacity.
Methods For the study, I used the methods of systems, structural and comparative analyses, and the concrete historical approach.
Results The analysis of the existing infrastructure of oil and gas export from Russia shows the availability of excess capacity. The capacity utilization ratios are different for both sectors, as well as different supply routes. The large infrastructure enhancement projects reveal the long-term nature of the problem.
Conclusions The dominant role of the State in the Russian energy sector has contributed to the active development of transport capacity. The strategic pivot towards Asia reduces the use of transport infrastructure in the western direction. The results of the analysis can be used to update the Russian energy strategy.

Keywords: energy strategy, energy security, oil export, gas export


  1. Mareš M., Laryš M. Oil and Natural Gas in Russia's Eastern Energy Strategy: Dream or Reality? Energy Policy, 2012, vol. 50, pp. 436–448. URL:
  2. Shadrina E. Russia's Natural Gas Policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, Objectives and Institutions. Energy Policy, 2014, vol. 74, pp. 54–67. URL:
  3. Baev P.K., Overland I. The South Stream versus Nabucco Pipeline Race: Geopolitical and Economic (Ir)rationales and Political Stakes in Mega-Projects. International Affairs, 2010, vol. 86, iss. 5, pp. 1075–1090. URL:
  4. Fernandez R. Nabucco and the Russian Gas Strategy vis-à-vis Europe. Post-Communist Economies, 2011, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 69–85. URL:
  5. Schaffer M.B. The Great Gas Pipeline Game: Monopolistic Expansion of Russia's Gazprom into European Markets. Foresight, 2008, vol. 10, iss. 5, pp. 11–23. URL:
  6. Boussena S., Locatelli C. Energy Institutional and Organizational Changes in EU and Russia: Revisiting Gas Relations. Energy Policy, 2013, vol. 55, pp. 180–189. URL:
  7. Lee Yu. Opportunities and Risks in Tukremnistan's Quest for Diversification of Its Gas Export Routes. Energy Policy, 2014, vol. 74, pp. 330–339. URL:
  8. Fernandez R. Some Scenarios for Russian Oil Exports up to 2020. Europe-Asia Studies, 2009, vol. 61, iss. 8, pp. 1441–1459. URL:
  9. Belyi A.V. Institutional Trends in Russia's Oil and Gas Sector. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 2013, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 163–178. URL:
  10. Makarova Yu.V. [Analysis of the current state of Russian LNG sector]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2016, vol. 10, no. 11-3, pp. 1018–1022. (In Russ.)
  11. Gaddy C.G., Ickes B.W. Resource Rents and the Russian Economy. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2005, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 559–583. URL:
  12. Stegen K.S. Deconstructing the “Energy Weapon”: Russia's Threat to Europe as Case Study. Energy Policy, 2011, vol. 39, iss. 10, pp. 6505–6513. URL:

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 4
April 2018