Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Assessment of conformity of a region's economic growth model to the sustainable development principles through the method of non-parametric optimization

Vol. 16, Iss. 9, SEPTEMBER 2018

Received: 4 July 2018

Received in revised form: 30 July 2018

Accepted: 6 August 2018

Available online: 14 September 2018

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC-MATHEMATICAL MODELING

JEL Classification: O44, Q01

Pages: 1749–1765

https://doi.org/10.24891/re.16.9.1749

Ratner S.V. V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
lanaratner@ipu.ru

ORCID id: not available

Iosifov V.V. Kuban State Technological University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
iosifov_v@mail.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject This article discusses the issues of measuring the degree of sustainability of economic systems development.
Objectives The article aims to develop a method of assessing the conformity of a region's economic growth model to the basic principles of sustainable development based on mathematical models of non-parametric optimization.
Methods For the study, we used a DEA technique taking into account the environmental aspect of the problem.
Results The calculation based on the statistics for 2014 identifies the regions with the optimal model of development and optimum impact on the environment, regions with economic growth potential, and the regions inefficiently using natural resources and approaching a large-scale environmental crisis.
Conclusions and Relevance The solution of the problem of environmental data envelopment analysis enables to rank regions according to the degree of ecological and economic efficiency, determine how the region's economic development model corresponds to the basic principles of sustainable development concept, and it promotes the use of the best available technologies. The proposed approach to the assessment of models of economic growth of regions can be used in the regional ecological management and at the industry branch level, when decision-making about spatial placing of production capacities.

Keywords: eco-economic efficiency, strategy, economic development, model, Data Envelopment Analysis

References:

  1. Bel'tyukova S.M. [Theoretical aspects to understanding the definitions of "stability", "sustainable development" and "sustainable development of the region"]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2015, no. 5-1, pp. 232–234. (In Russ.)
  2. Van der Hel S., Biermann F. The Authority of Science in Sustainability Governance: A Structured Comparison of Six Science Institutions Engaged with the Sustainable Development Goals. Environmental Science & Policy, 2017, vol. 77, pp. 211–220. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.008
  3. Oregi X., Pousse M., Mabe L. et al. Sustainability Assessment of Three Districts in the City of Donostia Through the NEST Simulation Tool. Natural Resources Forum, 2016, vol. 40, iss. 4, pp. 156–168. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12104
  4. Ahvenniemi H., Huovila A., Pinto-Seppä I., Airaksinen M. What Are the Differences Between Sustainable and Smart Cities? Cities, 2017, vol. 60, part A, pp. 234–245. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
  5. Haapio A. Towards Sustainable Urban Communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2012, vol. 32, iss. 1, pp. 165–169. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.08.002
  6. Galli A., Đurović G., Hanscom L., Knežević Je. Think Globally, Act Locally: Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals in Montenegro. Environmental Science & Policy, 2018, vol. 84, pp. 159–169. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.012
  7. Dhahri S., Omri A. Entrepreneurship Contribution to the Three Pillars of Sustainable Development: What Does the Evidence Really Say? World Development, 2018, vol. 106, pp. 64–77. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.008
  8. Moldan B., Janousková S., Hak T. How to Understand and Measure Environmental Sustainability: Indicators and Targets. Ecology Indicators, 2012, vol. 17, pp. 4–13. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033
  9. Dahl A.L. Achievements and Gaps in Indicators for Sustainability. Ecology Indicators, 2012, vol. 17, pp. 14–19. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032
  10. Hak T., Janousková S., Moldan B. Sustainable Development Goals: A Need for Relevant Indicators. Ecology Indicators, 2016, vol. 60, pp. 565–573. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
  11. Yan Y., Wang C., Quan Y. et al. Urban Sustainable Development Efficiency towards the Balance between Nature and Human Well-Being: Connotation, Measurement, and Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 178, pp. 67–75. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.013
  12. Ratner S.V. [The problem of optimizing development of regional economic systems on ecologic parameters]. Drukerovskii vestnik, 2016, no. 2, pp. 30–41. (In Russ.)
  13. Ratner S.V. [Network data envelopment analysis in regional environmental management problems]. Problemy upravleniya = Control Science, 2016, no. 6, pp. 35–46. (In Russ.)
  14. Sal'nikova A.A. [Optimizing regional ecological-and-economic planning using a data envelopment analysis]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2017, vol. 15, iss. 10, pp. 1959–1974. (In Russ.) URL: https://doi.org/10.24891/re.15.10.1959
  15. Porunov A.N. [The comparative effectiveness of public management environmental security in the region by DEA-analysis (for example Volga Federal District)]. Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment = Scientific Journal NRU ITMO. Series Economics and Environmental Management, 2016, no. 1, pp. 104–111. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/otsenka-sravnitelnoy-effektivnosti-gosudarstvennogo-menedzhmenta-ekologicheskoy-bezopasnosti-v-regione-metodom-dea-analiza-na-primere (In Russ.)
  16. Krivonozhko V.E., Lychev A.V. Modelirovanie i analiz deyatel'nosti slozhnykh sistem [Modeling and analysis of complex systems]. Moscow, LENAND Publ., 2013, 256 p.
  17. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 1984, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2631725?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1#page_thumbnails_tab_contents
  18. Nilsson M., Griggs D., Visbeck M. Policy: Map the Interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 2016, vol. 534, iss. 7607, pp. 320–322. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a
  19. Annan-Diab F., Molinari C. Interdisciplinarity: Practical Approach to Advancing Education for Sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 2017, vol. 15, iss. 2, part B, pp. 73–83. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006
  20. Caiado R.G.G., de Freitas Dias R., Mattos L.V. et al. Towards Sustainable Development through the Perspective of Eco-Efficiency – A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, vol. 165, pp. 890–904. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166
  21. Broman G.I., Robèrt K.-H. A Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, vol. 140, part 1, pp. 17–31. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.121
  22. Sueyoshi T., Yuan Y., Goto M. A Literature Study for DEA Applied to Energy and Environment. Energy Economics, 2017, vol. 62, iss. C, pp. 104–124. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.006

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 9
September 2018

Archive