+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ÈÄ «Ôèíàíñû è êðåäèò»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

The background for global gas market transformation: an overview of evaluation of global and regional reserves and prospects for production of unconventional hydrocarbons

Vol. 14, Iss. 15, APRIL 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 20 April 2015

Subject Heading: SCHOLAR DISPUTE

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 52-63

Ratner S.V. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
lanarat@mail.ru

Iosifov V.V. Kuban State Technological University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
iosifov@kubstu.ru

Importance The article represents an overview of original (primary) studies published within 1997 through 2014 that evaluate reserves of unconventional hydrocarbon resources and forecast the development of shale oil and gas production technologies.
     Objectives The research aims at evaluating the relevance and reliability of the information database used to provide forecasts on the development of global hydrocarbon markets, both in the scientific milieu and business community.
     Methods When selecting studies for a bibliographic analysis, we apply the snowball sampling approach relying upon three starting points (studies in Russian, English and Chinese).
     Results In the process of the bibliographical analysis, we find out that a majority of the selected studies give no reference to data underlying the estimates and fail to describe evaluation methods and input assumptions (assertions) used to make judgments. Most studies present point estimates of unconventional hydrocarbon resources instead of internal or probabilistic ones of definite statistical significance. Estimates of reserves vary a lot throughout the same regions since various sources indicate different unconventional hydrocarbon recoverability factors. Based on the sources selected for the analysis, we prepare a chart showing how estimates of shale gas reserves scatter throughout the most explored regions of the world. We find that the estimates may differ two- to sevenfold in various regions. Furthermore, the estimates tend to fall in the most explored regions, such as the USA and Canada; meanwhile they rise in the regions that are respectively new for exploration (Ukraine, Russia, Venezuela, Argentina, Republic of South Africa, etc.) as a result of new oil and gas bearing sections of geological structures discovered there.
     Conclusions and Relevance As a result of the research, we formulate possible paths for further energy surveys, which are still relevant, notwithstanding numerous researches on the 'shale oil and gas revolution' in the Russian and foreign scientific and analytical literature.

Keywords: energy, technological gap, shale gas, resource evaluation

References:

  1. Zharkov A.M. Otsenka potentsiala slantsevykh uglevodorodov Rossii [The evaluation of shale hydrocarbon reserves of Russia]. Mineral'nye resursy Rossii. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Mineral Resources of Russia. Economics and Management, 2011, no. 3, pp. 16–21.
  2. Ivanov N.A. Slantsevaya Amerika: energeticheskaya politika SShA i osvoenie netraditsionnykh neftegazovykh resursov [‘Shale’ America: the energy policy of the United States and the development of unconventional oil and gas resources]. Moscow, Magistr Publ., 2014, 304 p.
  3. Sinyak Yu.V., Nekrasov A.S., Voronina S.A., Semikashev V.V., Kolpakov A.Yu. Toplivno-energeticheskii kompleks Rossii: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy [The fuel and energy complex of Russia: opportunities and prospects]. Problemy prognozirovaniya = Problems of Forecasting, 2013, no. 1, pp. 4–21.
  4. Sukharev O.S. Ekonomika tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya [Technological development economics]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2008, 480 p.
  5. Abschätzung des Erdgaspotenzials aus dichten Tongesteinen (Schiefergas) in Deutschland. Hannover, Germany, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, 2012. Available at: Link_ Schiefergaspotenzial_in_Deutschland_ 2012.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
  6. Annual Energy Outlook. Washington, DC, Energy Information Administration, 2012. Available at: Link.
  7. Assessment of Canada’s Natural Gas Resources Base. Calgary, Alberta, Petrel Robertson Consulting Ltd, 2010.
  8. Assessment of Potential Shale Gas Resources of the Bombay, Cauvery, and Krishnae Godavari Provinces, India, 2011. Available at: Link.
  9. Assessment of Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resources of the Lower Palaeozoic Baltic-Podlasie-Lublin Basin in Poland. Available at: Link.
  10. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Rice University, 2010. Available at: Link.
  11. Chinese Ministry of Land Resources. Results of the National Shale Gas Geological Survey and Priority Locations, 2012.
  12. Clarke R. The Global Unconventional Gas Trends. Available at: Link.
  13. Coppel J.S. Mexico’s hydrocarbon potential. In: North American Energy Resources Summit. Houston, TX, United States, PEMEX, 2012.
  14. Dai J., Ni Y., Wu X. Tight Gas in China and its Significance in Exploration and Exploitation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 277–284.
  15. Dawson F.M. Cross Canada Check up Unconventional Gas Emerging Opportunities and Status of Activity. In: CSUG Technical Luncheon. Calgary, AB, 2010. Available at: Link.
  16. The Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources of Britain’s Onshore Basins – Shale Gas. Department of Energy & Climate Change. Available at: Link.
  17. Dong D., Zou C., Yang H., Wang Y., Li X., Chen G., Wang S., Lu Z., Hong Y. Progress and Prospects of Shale Gas Exploration and Development in China. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, no. 33 (S. 1), pp. 107–114.
  18. Ejaz Q. Supplementary paper SP2.2: Background Material on Natural Gas Resource Assessments, with Major Resource Country Reviews. Cambridge, MT, MIT, 2010.
  19. Fueling North America’s Energy Future: the Unconventional Natural Gas Revolution and the Carbon Agenda. Available at: Link.
  20. Gas from Shale: Potential outside North America? Cambridge, MA, IHS CERA, 2009.
  21. Harvey T., Gray J. The Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources of Britain’s Onshore Basins – Shale Gas. Available at: Link.
  22. Henning B.B. Talking about a Revolution: Shale and Natural Gas Market Fundamentals in American Gas Association Leadership Council. Washington, DC, ICF International, 2011. Available at: Link.
  23. Hennings S. Shale Gas Resources and Development. In: IIR Inaugural Shale Gas Briefing. Brisbane, 2010.
  24. Jia C., Zheng M., Zhang Y. Unconventional Hydrocarbon Resources in China and the Prospect of Exploration and Development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 139–146.
  25. Kuuskraa V.A. Economic and Market Impacts of Abundant International Shale Gas Resources. In: Worldwide Shale Gas Resource Assessment. Washington, DC, Advanced Resources International Inc., 2011. Available at: Link.
  26. Kuuskraa V.A. Gas Shales Drive the Unconventional Gas Revolution. In: Washington Energy Policy Conference: The Unconventional Gas Revolution. Washington, DC, Advanced Resources International Inc., 2010.
  27. Kuuskraa V.A. Unconventional Gas: an Exportable North American Revolution? In: The Changing Fundamentals of Global Gas Markets – Europe as the Battleground? Washington, DC, Advanced Resources International Inc., 2010.
  28. Kuuskraa V.A. Worldwide Gas Shales and Unconventional Gas: a Status Report. Arlington, VA, Advanced Resources International Inc., 2009. Available at: Link.
  29. Kuuskraa V.A., Van Leeuwen T. Economic and Market Impacts of Abundant Shale Gas Resources. In: Global Leaders Forum: The Natural Gas Revolution: U.S. and Global Impacts. Arlington, VA, Advanced Resources International Inc., 2011.
  30. McGlade C., Speirs J., Sorrell S. Unconventional Gas – a Review of Regional and Global Estimates. Energy, 2013, no. 55, pp. 571–584.
  31. Mohr S.H., Evans G.M. Long term Forecasting of Natural Gas Production. Energy Policy, 2011, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 5550–5560.
  32. Mohr S.H., Evans G.M. Shale Gas Changes N. American Gas Production Projections. Oil and Gas Journal, 2010, vol. 108, no. 27, pp. 60–64.
  33. Moniz E.J., Jacoby H.D., Meggs A.J.M. The Future of Natural Gas. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010. Available at: Link.
  34. National Assessment of Oil and Gas Resources Update. Reston, VA, United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2012.
  35. Petak K.R. Impact of natural gas supply on CHP development. In: US Clean Heat & Power Association’s (USCHPA) Spring CHP Forum. Washington, DC, 2011.
  36. Potential Gas Committee Reports Substantial Increase in Magnitude of US Natural Gas Resource Base. Available at: Link.
  37. Potential Gas Committee Reports Unprecedented Increase in Magnitude of U.S. Natural Gas Resource Base. Available at: Link.
  38. Reserves, Resources and Availability of Energy Resources: 2011. Hannover, Germany, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, 2012. Available at: Link_ Rohstoffinformationen/rohstoffinformationen-15e.pdf?__ blob=publicationFile&v=3.
  39. Review of Emerging Resources: U.S. Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays. Washington, DC, INTEK, 2011.
  40. Review of Emerging Resources: U.S. Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays. Washington, DC, INTEK, 2012.
  41. Rogner H.-H. An Assessment of World Hydrocarbon Resources. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 1997, no. 22, pp. 217–262.
  42. Schenk C.J., Kirschbaum M.A., Charpentier R.R., Cook T.A., Klett T.R., Gautier D.L., Pollastro R.M., Weaver J.N., Brownfield M. Assessment of Potential Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resources of the Norte Basin, Uruguay, 2011. Reston, VA, US Geological Survey, 2011, 2 p.
  43. Shale Gas and Emerging Market Dynamics. In: USAEE/IAEE’s 29th North American Conference. Calgary, Alberta, James A Baker III Institute for Public Policy Rice University, 2012.
  44. Shale Gas and U.S. National Security. Houston, TX, Rice University, 2011.
  45. Shale Gas, Emerging Fundamentals, and Geopolitics. In: SPEGCS General Meeting. Houston, TX, James A Baker III Institute for Public Policy Rice University, 2012.
  46. Skipper K. Status of Global Shale Gas Developments, with Particular Emphasis on North America. In: IIR Inaugural Shale Gas Briefing. Brisbane, 2010.
  47. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries outside the United States. Available at: Link.
  48. Theal C. The Shale Gas Revolution: the Bear Market Balancing Act, 2009.
  49. Tian L., Wang Z., Krupnick A., Liu X. Stimulating Shale Gas Development in China: a Comparison with the US Experience. Energy Policy, 2014, no. 75, pp. 109–116.
  50. World Energy Council. In: Survey of Energy Resources: Focus on Shale Gas. Ed. by Davis R. London, UK, World Energy Council, 2010. 36 p.
  51. World Shale Gas Resources: an Initial Assessment of 14 Regions outside the United States. Washington, DC, Advanced Resources International Inc., 2011. Available at: Link.
  52. Zou C.N., Dong D.Z., Wang S.J., Li J.Z., Li X.J., Wang Y.M., Li D.H., Cheng K.M. Geological Characteristics and Resource Potential of Shale Gas in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 641–653.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive