+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Analysis of methods to assess the innovative capacity of an invention

Vol. 14, Iss. 21, JUNE 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 11 June 2015

Subject Heading: SCHOLAR DISPUTE

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 55-67

Timofeev N.V. Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
cechbobr@bk.ru

Importance Under the transition to creative economy, innovation becomes a major factor of economic development. Therefore, it is crucial to choose perspective inventions both from technological and economical points of view. In this context, methods for assessment of innovative potential of inventions become particularly important.
     Objectives The objective of the research is to select the most optimal and universal technique from those currently available to assess the innovative potential of inventions. The task was to analyze expert, quantitative and complex methods of assessment, to figure out their merits and demerits, and to evaluate the possibility of their practical application.
     Methods The methodological basis of the research is the study of the latest economic literature and the use of structural analysis.
     Results I studied and analyzed the most common methods for assessing the innovative capacity of inventions. The analysis failed to reveal an optimal and universal technique. Moreover, I established that at present the scientific community does not have a uniform understanding of the concept of innovative (economic) capacity. Therefore, I present a logical flowchart of the innovative capacity concept.
     Conclusions and Relevance The study shows that today there is no optimal and universal methodology to assess the innovative potential of inventions. The reason for this is disagreements of scientists over the definition of the essence of fundamental concepts of the innovation theory. To fill up the gap, it is necessary to attract the attention of relevant researchers to the lack of universal techniques for assessing the innovative capacity of inventions and a clear definition of the economic substance of the fundamental concepts of the innovation theory, which would be perfectly appropriate for the majority of the academic community.

Keywords: innovation, invention, innovative product, innovative capacity, economic strength, potential, assessment methods

References:

  1. Abalkin L.I. Novyi tip ekonomicheskogo myshleniya [A new type of economic thinking]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1987, 189 p.
  2. Abramov V.I. Metodologiya otsenki innovatsionnogo potentsiala [Methodology for assessing the innovative capacity]. Samara, DSM Publ., 2012, 176 p.
  3. Abramov V.I. Metodologiya otsenki innovatsionnogo potentsiala predpriyatiya [Methodology for assessing the innovation capacity of an enterprise]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki = University proceedings. Volga region. Social Sciences, 2012, no. 4, pp. 130–137.
  4. Abramov V.I. Sintez metoda kolichestvennoi otsenki innovatsionnogo potentsiala na mikrourovne [Synthesis of the method for assessing the innovation capacity at the microlevel]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University, 2012, no. 4, pp. 252–260.
  5. Abramov V.I., Vagin S.G. Metod ekspertizy innovatsionnogo potentsiala proekta [Method of examining the innovative capacity of a project]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogogo universiteta = Bulletin of Samara State University of Economics, 2012, no. 5, pp. 9–13.
  6. Ansoff I. Strategicheskoe upravlenie [Strategic Management]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1989, 358 p.
  7. Akhmetova N.N. Odin iz podkhodov k opredeleniyu sushchnosti elementov innovatsionno-investitsionnoi modeli. V kn.: Upravlenie ekonomikoi: metody, modeli, tekhnologii [An approach to determining the essence of the elements of an innovation and investment model. In: Management of economy: methods, models, and technologies]. Ufa, USATU Publ., 2010, pp. 61–63.
  8. Bazhenov G.E., Kislitsina O.A. Innovatsionnyi potentsial predpriyatiya: ekonomicheskii aspekt [Innovation capacity of an enterprise: an economic aspect]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2009, no. 323, pp. 222–228.
  9. Vagin S.G. Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie formirovaniya geterogennykh sistem kak novoi organizatsionnoi formy strategicheskogo upravleniya [Theoretical basis of heterogeneous systems’ formation as a new organizational form of strategic management]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogogo universiteta = Bulletin of Samara State University of Economics, 2007, no. 1, pp. 17–20.
  10. Ermakova Zh.A., Svechnikova V.V. Metodika otsenki innovatsionnogo razvitiya korporativnykh struktur [A valuation technique for innovation development of corporate entities]. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Journal of Creative Economy, 2009, no. 7, pp. 88–99.
  11. Erygina L.V. Otsenka perspektivnosti innovatsionnoi tekhnologii na predpriyatiyakh raketno-kosmicheskoi promyshlennosti [Assessing the innovative technology prospects at the rocket and space industry enterprises]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2008, no. 6, pp. 93–96.
  12. Kuvshinov M.S., Bazhanova M.I. Sushchnost' i struktura mekhanizma innovatsionnogo razvitiya promyshlennoi integrirovannoi struktury [The essence and structure of innovative development of an industrial integrated structure]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Ekonomika i menedzhment” = Bulletin of South Ural State University. Economy and Management Series, 2012, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 50–55.
  13. Kulabukhova N.N. Otsenka innovatsionnogo potentsiala predpriyatiya [Assessing the innovative capacity of an enterprise]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki” = Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Social and Economic Sciences Series, 2006, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 83–92.
  14. Pavlova S.N. Kompleksnaya otsenka innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika [Integrated evaluation of innovation: theory, methodology, practice]. Yakutsk, Sfera Publ., 2011, 420 p.
  15. Permichev N.F., Paleeva O.A. Marketing innovatsii [Marketing of innovation]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Publ., 2007, 88 p.
  16. Seleznev A.M. Nauchnyi potentsial sovremennogo obshchestva [Scientific potential of the modern society]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ., 1989, 144 p.
  17. Soldatov A.V. Otsenka vliyaniya chelovecheskogo faktora na innovatsionnyi potentsial [Assessing the impact of the human factor on innovation capacity]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  18. Suzdaleva G.R. Vuz i predpriyatie: usloviya dlya uspeshnogo innovatsionnogo razvitiya [A higher school and an enterprise: conditions for successful innovation development]. Vestnik PNIPU = Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 2012, no. 16, pp. 69–74.
  19. Titov A.B. Marketing i upravlenie innovatsiyami [Marketing and innovation management]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001, 240 p.
  20. Titov A.B. Organizatsionnye metody upravleniya novovvedeniyami [Organizational methods to manage innovation]. St. Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance Publ., 1998, 26 p.
  21. Titov A.B. Otsenka kommercheskogo potentsiala novovvedenii [Assessing the commercial potential of innovation]. St. Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance Publ., 1998, 139 p.
  22. Trifilova A.A. Upravlenie innovatsionnym razvitiem predpriyatiya [Managing the innovative development of an enterprise]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2003, 176 p.
  23. Upravlenie innovatsionnymi protsessami [Innovation process management]. Samara, SSTU Publ., 2009, 153 p.
  24. Fundamental'nye problemy prostranstvennogo razvitiya makroregiona pri perekhode k innovatsionnoi ekonomike. Na primere Severo-Zapada Rossii [Fundamental problems of spatial development of a macroregion under transition to innovative economy. The North-West of Russia case]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2010, 595 p.
  25. Andersson N., King N. Managing Innovation and Change: A Critical Guide for Organizations. London, Thomson, 2002, 255 p.
  26. Belina B., Giesko T., Łopacińska L., Walasik M. Setting of criteria in the commercial potential assessment method of innovative technological solutions. Maintenance Problems, 2013, no. 2, pp. 221–234.
  27. Belina B., Łopacińska L., Karsznia W. Commercial potential oriented evaluation of innovative products. Maintenance Problems, 2012, no. 4, pp. 23–32.
  28. Buergin C. Integrated innovation capability. Paper of International Design Conference – DESIGN 2006. Dubrovnik (Croatia), 2006, May 15–18, pp. 445–462.
  29. Edwards T.J., Delbridge R., Munday M. Linking innovative potential to SME performance: an assessment of enterprises in industrial South Wales. Available at: Link.
  30. Galvez D., Camargo M., Rodriguez J., Morel L. PII – Potential Innovation Index: a Tool to Benchmark Innovation Capabilities in International Context. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2013, vol. 8, iss. 4, pp. 36–45.
  31. Garcia R., Calantone R. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2002, no. 19, pp. 110–132.
  32. Grünfeld L.A., Jakobsen E.W., Kaloudis A., Skogli E., Olsen D.S. Key Innovation Indicators. Learning from Principles and Practices Applied by Professional Industrial Players and Investors. Oslo, Nordic Innovation, 2011, 72 p.
  33. Hipple J., Hardy D., Wilson S.A., Michalski J. Can corporate innovation champions survive? Chemical Innovation, 2001, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 14–22.
  34. Justel D., Vidal R., Arriaga E., Franco V., Val-Jauregi E. Evaluation method for selecting innovative product concepts with greater potential marketing success. Available at: Link_ innovative_product_concepts_with_greater_potential _marketing_success.
  35. Kaplan R., Norton D. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 1992, no. 1, pp. 71–79.
  36. Kornish L.J., Ulrich K.T. The Importance of the Raw Idea in Innovation: Testing the Sow's Ear Hypothesis. Journal of Marketing Research, 2014, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 14–26.
  37. Lendel V., Varmus M. Innovative potential of strategy. Available at: Link.
  38. Meier M., Fadel G., Wälchli N., Kobe C., Johns C.St. The Impact Model for Innovation Success and its Assessment. Zürich, Technology Management, 2004.
  39. Pleschak F., Sabisch H. Innovations management. Stuttgart, Schäffer-Poeschel, 1996, 566 p.
  40. Rothwell R. External networking and innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in Europe. Technovation, 1991, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 93–112.
  41. Rothwell R. Small firms, innovation and industrial change. Small Business Economics, 1989, no. 1, pp. 51–64.
  42. Sabadka D. Innovation potential methods. Annals of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara – International Journal of Engineering, 2012, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 449–455.
  43. Savoia A., Copeland P. Entrepreneurial Innovation at Google. IEEE: Computer, 2011, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 56–61.
  44. Tschirky H., Koruna S. Technologie-Management: Idee und Praxis. Zürich, Verlag Industrielle Organisation, 1998.
  45. Von Stamm B. Managing Innovation, Design and Creativity. Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, 2008, 444 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive