Importance Considering the globalization and onset of the multipolar world, innovative focus of national economies becomes a requirement for their successful development. Russia possesses substantial innovative potential. However, there is no common and clear understanding of the successful use of the potential worldwide. Objectives The research identifies the main specifics of Russia’s involvement in global competition of national innovative economies after crisis phenomena in the late 2000s. Methods The research relies upon a conceptual analysis of views on national innovative systems. I used annual ratings of Bloomberg and World Intellectual Property Organization. Results National innovative systems generate a mechanism that would allow countries to compete. Top-10 leading economies of the world remained almost unchanged, with Russia strengthening its positions. The difference between Russia’s position in ratings can be explained by absolutely different ranking methods. Conclusions and Relevance Global competition of national innovative economies constitutes a phenomenon associated with the globalization. Leading innovation-driven economies demonstrate rather tough competition, however, this competition does not result in sharp changes in their list. Russia takes part in this competition actively and successfully. There are some risks for supporting the appropriate innovative competitiveness of Russia. Russia has an effective innovation policy but it still needs to be adjusted to respective risks.
Keywords: globalization, innovation, competition, global economy, ratings
Arkhipov A.Yu., Eletskii A.N. [Multipolarity of the global economy: materials for lectures and seminars]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal, 2014, no. 3, pp. 42–53. (In Russ.)
Arkhipov A.Yu., Yeletsky A.N. Various Aspects of Multipolarity within the World Economic System. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, no. 6, pp. 59–66. URL: Link
Balatskii E.V. [Geopolitical challenges to Russia during the globalization of global capital]. Vestnik UrFU. Ser. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series: Economics and Management, 2016, no. 5, pp. 638–653. (In Russ.)
Huebener P., O'Brien S., Porter T., Stockdale L., Zhou Y.R. Exploring the Intersection of Time and Globalization. Globalizations, 2016, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 243–255. URL: Link
Antonelli C. The Economics of Innovation, New Technologies, and Structural Change. Routledge, 2003, 210 p.
Atkinson R.D., Ezell S.J. Innovation Economics: The Race for Global Advantage. Yale University Press, 2012, 440 p.
Squalli J., Wilson K. Intelligence, Creativity, and Innovation. Intelligence, 2014, vol. 46, pp. 250–257. URL: Link
Cecere G. The Economics of Innovation: A Review Article. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2015, vol. 40, iss. 2, pp. 185–197. URL: Link
Dudin M.N., Ivashchenko N.P. [Developing institutions for ‘growing’ innovation projects amid the origination of the venture environment]. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie) = MIR(Modernization. Innovation. Research), 2016, no. 3, pp. 70–75. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Isaev R.A. [Innovation economy: administrative issues]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya = Economics and Management: Issues, Solutions, 2016, no. 9, pp. 137–141. (In Russ.)
Keshisheva N.G. [Territories of innovative development: foreign expertise and national practices]. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta upravleniya i ekonomiki = Bulletin of the Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 51–57. (In Russ.)
Lipina S.A., Lipina A.V. [Innovative economy of the 21st century: Global expertise and practice]. Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya = Success of Modern Science and Education, 2016, no. 1, pp. 11–13. (In Russ.)
Suslov V.I. [Innovative economy: general principles]. Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava = Bulletin of the Altai Academy on Economics and Law, 2015, no. 1, pp. 15–24. (In Russ.)
Kravets A.V. [Innovative economy of Russia: issues and prospects of economic growth]. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Journal of Creative Economy, 2016, no. 1, pp. 21–34. (In Russ.)
Nosachevskaya E.A. [On S&T and innovative potential of Russia]. EKO = ECO, 2011, no. 8, pp. 5–15. (In Russ.)
Stolyar T.V. [Innovative economy and approaches to its formation in the Russian Federation]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie = ASR: Economics and Management, 2016, no. 2, pp. 229–233. (In Russ.)
Freeman C. The ‘National System of Innovation’ in Historical Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 5–24.
Lundvall B.-A. Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation. In: Technical Change and Economic Theory. Burns & Oates, 1988, pp. 349–369.
Teixeira A.A.C. Evolution, Roots and Influence of the Literature on National Systems of Innovation: A Bibliometric Account. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2014, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 181–214. URL: Link
Gusarova S.A., Gusarov I.V. [Origination of national innovative systems in the BRICS]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2015, no. 3-2, pp. 140–145. (In Russ.)
Popadyuk E.G. [The national innovative system during the globalization of innovative processes]. Innovatsionnaya nauka = Innovative Science, 2015, no. 8-1, pp. 49–51. (In Russ.)
Salim'yanova I.G., Dyachuk E.A. [The innovative environment and national innovative system]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2015, no. 10-1, pp. 99–102. (In Russ.)
Semenov A.I. [The concept of national innovative system and key areas of management of Russia's innovative system]. Biznes i strategii = Business and Strategies, 2016, no. 2, pp. 45–48. (In Russ.)
Ruban D.A. [Dualism of the design of regional innovative systems]. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta upravleniya i ekonomik = Bulletin of the Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics, 2015, no. 2, pp. 3–10. (In Russ.)
Woodside A.G., Mir Bernal P., Coduras A. The General Theory of Culture, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Quality-of-Life: Comparing Nurturing versus Thwarting Enterprise Start-ups in BRIC, Denmark, Germany, and the United States. Industrial Marketing Management, 2016, vol. 53, pp. 136–159. URL: Link
Vasil'eva N.F., Astakhin E.K., Fedorov V.R. [Studying the effect of western sanctions on economic indicators of Russia]. Korporativnaya ekonomika = Corporate Economy, 2016, no. 2, pp. 4–11. (In Russ.)
Sidorin M.Yu. [Economic sanctions as the premise for a new innovative and investment technological mode]. Belgorodskii ekonomicheskii vestnik = Belgorod Economic Bulletin, 2015, no. 4, pp. 79–84. (In Russ.)
Fedosov P.E. [Economic sanctions and the reasonableness of the Russian economy's transition to the innovative path of development]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.Ser. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series Economics and Management, 2015, no. 4, pp. 32–35. (In Russ.)