+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

The effect of sanctions on the economy of the Russian Federation

Vol. 14, Iss. 37, OCTOBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 31 July 2015

Accepted: 10 August 2015

Available online: 15 October 2015

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-12

Fedorova E.A. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
ecolena@mail.ru

Barikhina Yu.A. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
jubarikhina@mail.ru

Importance Instability in the financial market and the embargo resulted in financial stress, scarce raw materials or reduced sales capacity of domestic industries. To make adequate investment decisions, it is crucial to evaluate the risk of sanctions for critical economic sectors.
     Objectives It is incorrect to consider the assessment of the impact of sanctions on the Russian economy only in the context of individual economic units, like industries or regions. The cumulative effect is possible to measure only by considering the changes in the entire processing chain, taking into account export-import operations.
     Methods One of the most effective methods for assessment is the regression analysis based on historical data through introducing artificial variables to consider the specifics of each individual model.
     Results Imports from Germany, Italy and Korea have the strongest effect on domestic enterprises' revenues operating in the trade industry. The findings show that the impact of exports and imports of the countries, which imposed sanctions, and the friendly countries (China) may differ in terms of direction and magnitude. For instance, if Germany reduces its export to our country by 10%, the revenue in the analyzed industries will fall by 3.4% per year.
     Conclusions The sanctions endanger the implementation of many projects that are significant for economic development, and, in the short term, they may lead to deteriorated performance. In the long run, the economy will be able to rely on the assistance of developing countries, but inevitably will suffer from the lack of innovation and state-of-the-art technologies.

Keywords: sanctions, export, import, industry specifics, spillover effect

References:

  1. Aitken B., Harrison A., Lipsey R.E. Wages and Foreign Ownership: A Comparative Study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States. Journal of International Economics, 1996, vol. 40 (3-4), pp. 345–371.
  2. Griliches Z. The Search for R&D Spillovers. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers Series, 1991, no. 3768.
  3. Kadochnikov S.M., Drapkin I.M., Davidson N.B., Fedyunina A.A. Effektivnost' natsional'nykh kompanii i diversifikatsiya promyshlennosti regiona kak faktory vneshnikh effektov ot pryamykh zarubezhnykh investitsii v rossiiskoi ekonomike [The efficiency of national companies and diversification of industry in the region as spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Russian economy]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2011, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 3–26.
  4. Greenaway D., Sousa N., Wakelin K. Do Domestic Firms Learn to Export from Multinationals? European Journal of Political Economy, 2004, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1027–1043.
  5. Kneller R., Pisu M. Export-Oriented FDI in the UK. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2004, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 424–439.
  6. Belitz H., Mölders F. International Knowledge Spillovers through High-Tech Imports and R&D of Foreign-Owned Firms. Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin, 2013, no. 1276.
  7. Badinger H., Egger P. Intra- and Inter-Industry Productivity Spillovers in OECD Manufacturing: A Spatial Econometrics Perspective. CESifo Working Papers, 2008, no. 2181.
  8. Benz S., Larch M., Zimmer M. Trade in Ideas: Outsourcing and Knowledge Spillover. Leibniz Information Centre for Economics. Ifo Working Paper, 2014, no. 173. Available at: Link.
  9. Mitze T. Measuring Regional Spillovers in Long-and Short-Run Models of Total Factor Productivity, Trade, and FDI. International Regional Science Review, 2014, no. 37, pp. 365–388.
  10. Halpern L., Muraközy B. Does Distance Matter in Spillover? Economics of Transition, 2007, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 781–805.
  11. Stančik J. Horizontal and Vertical FDI Spillovers: Recent Evidence from the Czech Republic. Available at: Link.
  12. Galesi A., Sgherri S. Regional Financial Spillovers across Europe: A Global VAR Analysis. International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper, 2009, no. 09/23.
  13. Havránek T., Iršová Z. Determinants of Horizontal Spillovers from FDI: Evidence from a Large Meta-Analysis. Prague, Czech National Bank, Working Paper Series, 2011, no. 7.
  14. Fedorova E.A., Barikhina Yu.A. Otsenka gorizontal'nykh i vertikal'nykh spillover-effektov ot pryamykh inostrannykh investitsii v Rossii [Assessing the horizontal and vertical spillover effects of foreign direct investment in Russia]. Voprosy Economiki, 2015, no. 3, pp. 46–60.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive