Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Theories of social norms onset in economics, sociology and law: A comparison

Vol. 17, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2018

Received: 28 September 2017

Received in revised form: 27 October 2017

Accepted: 15 November 2017

Available online: 29 January 2018

Subject Heading: INTEGRATED ECONOMIC-SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

JEL Classification: C70, E02, E03

Pages: 82–98

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.17.1.82

Istratov V.A. Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
istratov@cemi.rssi.ru

ORCID id: not available

Importance The article compares theories of social norms onset in economics, sociology and law, i.e. social sciences that address the issues of norms most closely.
Objectives I identify common features and patterns of norm development.
Methods The comparison draws on two aspects: first, I compare interpretations of the norm concept, of which the theories of norms onset came out; secondly, I compare the theories of norms onset and, in some cases, subsequent norm development.
Results The analysis of relevant literature shows that the interpenetration of theories in these areas of knowledge is large, and it is possible to highlight common key elements and associate them with each other. A norm is generally understood in most theories as a set of restrictions on conduct supported by certain coercive measures. As for developing a social norm, it may take several paths, but the most popular explanatory factor is the enhancement of individual or societal effectiveness in carrying out actions regulated by the norm.
Conclusions Theories about the genesis of norms are rather scattered and fragmentary, in some cases they are even contradictory. On the one hand, this is due to differences in research priorities of the sciences themselves and, on the other hand, there is a lack of consensus on concepts and processes that define them. It is, therefore, important to develop a theory of social norms formation. The findings may be useful for modeling the socio-economic relationships, in particular, in different paradigms of simulation.

Keywords: institution, social norm, game-theoretic equilibrium, behavior

References:

  1. Istratov V.A. [An agent-oriented model of human behavior: Doesn't money buy happiness?]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods, 2009, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 129–140. (In Russ.)
  2. Istratov V.A. [Modeling daily scheduling]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods, 2014, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 24–37. (In Russ.)
  3. Horne C. Sociological Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Norms. In: Social Norms. Ed. by M. Hechter, K.-D. Opp. NY, Russell Sage Foundation, 2001, pp. 3–35.
  4. Cooter R.D. Decentralized Law for a Complex Economy: The Structural Approach to Adjudicating the New Law Merchant. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1996, vol. 144, iss. 5, pp. 1643–1696.
  5. Elster J. Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989, vol. 3, iss. 4, pp. 99–117.
  6. Elsenbroich C., Gilbert N. Modelling Norms. Springer, Dordrecht, 2014. URL: Link
  7. Opp K.-D. How Do Norms Emerge? An Outline of a Theory. Mind and Society, 2001, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 101–128. URL: Link
  8. Axelrod R. An Evolutionary Approach to Norms. American Political Science Review, 1986, vol. 80, iss. 4, pp. 1095–1111. URL: Link
  9. Schotter A., Schwödiauer G. Economics and the Theory of Games: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1980, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 479–527.
  10. Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N. Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2001, vol. 44, iss. 1, pp. 31–54. URL: Link00152-9
  11. Veblen T. Teoriya prazdnogo klassa [The Theory of the Leisure Class]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2011, 366 p.
  12. North D. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 97–112.
  13. Val'tukh K.K. Udovletvorenie potrebnostei obshchestva i modelirovanie narodnogo khozyaistva [Satisfying the needs of the society and modeling the national economy]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1973, 380 p.
  14. Nevskaya N.A. [The indicative planning: Experience and prospects in the Russian economy]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie = Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Management, 2016, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–34. (In Russ.)
  15. Conte R., Castelfranchi C. Norms as Mental Objects: From Normative Beliefs to Normative Goals. In: Reasoning about Mental States: Formal Theories & Applications. Technical Report SS-93-05. Ed. by J. Horty, Y. Shoham. Menlo Park, California, The AAAI Press, 1993, pp. 40–47.
  16. Conte R., Castelfranchi C. Understanding the Functions of Norms in Social Groups through Simulation. In: Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life. Ed. by N. Gilbert, R. Conte, London, UCL Press, 1995, pp. 252–267.
  17. McAdams R.H. The origin, development, and regulation of norms. Michigan Law Review, 1997, vol. 96, iss. 2, pp. 338–433.
  18. Tambovtsev V.L. [Emergence of institutions: Methodological individualism perspective]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2010, no. 11, pp. 83–96. (In Russ.)
  19. Svensson M. Norms in Law and Society: Towards a Definition of the Socio-Legal Concept of Norms. In: Social and Legal Norms. Ed. by M. Baier, London, Ashgate, 2013, pp. 39–52. URL: Link
  20. Ellickson R.C. The Market for Social Norms. American Law and Economics Review, 2001, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 1–49.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 9
September 2018

Archive