Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Analyzing the efficiency of regional measures to support industry

Vol. 17, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2018

Received: 10 August 2018

Received in revised form: 21 August 2018

Accepted: 31 August 2018

Available online: 31 October 2018

Subject Heading: ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRIAL CAPITAL

JEL Classification: D01, L12, L14, R11

Pages: 1800–1818

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.17.10.1800

Makarova I.V. Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Makarova_iv@usue.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8054-1821

Subject The article assesses the efficiency regional measures implemented to support industrial enterprises.
Objectives The study focuses on defining areas of analysis and indicators of efficiency of measures taken to support industrial enterprises, detecting bottlenecks, and devising measures to increase the efficiency of industrial policy implementation in regions.
Methods The study employs methods of comparative and factor analysis.
Results I considered modern trends in industrial regions of the Big Ural area, analyzed the condition of, and changes in the development of industrial complex of the Sverdlovsk oblast as compared to other regions. The paper substantiates that increase in output and break-even operation should be considered as tactical tasks of domestic industrial enterprises. It offers directions, methods and mechanisms of regional support to industrial enterprises that provide for rational use of the potential of industrial regions.
Conclusions When developing a qualitatively new regional industrial policy, it is crucial to take into account the assessment of measures of government support to enterprises, and revealed possibilities of their adjustment.

Keywords: performance analysis, support, industry, region

References:

  1. Vorob'eva N.A. [Assessment of Far Eastern Federal District industry within the framework of State industrial policy]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University, 2012, no. 10, pp. 270–275. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  2. Goryacheva T.V. [Criteria and System of Indicators of an Estimation of Efficiency of Realisation of an Industrial Policy]. Geteromagnitnaya mikroelektronika, 2012, no. 12, pp. 123–129. (In Russ.)
  3. Danilushkin N.S. [Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of State industrial policy]. FES: Finansy. Ekonomika. Strategiya = FES: Finance. Economy. Strategy, 2016, no. 5, pp. 24–27. (In Russ.)
  4. Litvinova O.V. [Evaluating the effectiveness of the State industrial policy and measures address the impact on the regional economy]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics, 2014, no. 5, pp. 97–100. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  5. Nizamutdinov I.K. Regional'naya promyshlennaya politika: osobennosti formirovaniya realizatsii [Regional industrial policy: Specifics of implementation formation]. Kazan, KSU Publ., 2015, 140 p.
  6. Orkusha M.A. [Criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of industrial policy]. Vestnik ekonomicheskoi integratsii, 2014, no. 1, pp. 59–65. (In Russ.)
  7. Kolesnikova I. [Analysis of effectiveness of State support to enterprises as an instrument of industrial policy in the Republic of Belarus]. EKOVEST = ECOWEST, 2007, no. 2, pp. 275–296. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  8. Harris R., Robinson C. Industrial Policy in Great Britain and its Effect on Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing Plants (1990–1998). Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2004, vol. 51, iss. 4, pp. 528–543. URL: Link
  9. Gual J., Jodar-Rosell S. Vertical Industrial Policy in the EU: An Empirical Analysis of the Effectiveness of State Aid. La Caixa Economic Paper, 2006, no. 01, 42 p. URL: Link
  10. Bergström F. Capital Subsidies and the Performance of Firms. Small Business Economics, 2000, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 183–193. URL: Link
  11. Beason R., Weinstein D. Growth, Economies of Scale, and Targeting in Japan (1955–1990). The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1996, vol. 78, iss. 2, pp. 286–295.
  12. Peck F., McGuinness D. Regional Development Agencies and Cluster Strategies: Engaging the knowledge-base in the North of England. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 2003, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 49–62. URL: Link
  13. Wren C., Storey D. Evaluating the Effect of Soft Business Support upon Small Firm Performance. Oxford Economic Papers, 2002, vol. 54, iss. 2, pp. 334–365. URL: Link
  14. Girma S., Görg H., Strobl E. The Effect of Government Grants on Plant Level Productivity. Economics Letters, 2007, vol. 94, iss. 3, pp. 439–444. URL: Link
  15. Akyol A., Akehurst G. An Investigation of Export Performance Variations Related to Corporate Export Market Orientation. European Business Review, 2003, vol. 15, iss. 1, pp. 5–19.
  16. Coughlin C.C., Cartwright P.A. An Examination of State Foreign Export Promotion and Manufacturing Exports. Journal of Regional Science, 1987, vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 439–449. URL: Link
  17. Gabidinova G.S. [Concept and structure of territory assets]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2012, no. 14, pp. 35–43. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  18. Kapranova L.D. [The digital economy in Russia: Its state and prospects of development]. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics. Taxes. Law, 2018, no. 2, pp. 58–69. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  19. Baranova M.A. [Developing the methods to assess the entrepreneurial potential of small enterprises in regional economy]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2018, vol. 16, iss. 6, pp. 1065–1081. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 11
November 2018

Archive