Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Abstracting and Indexing

РИНЦ
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Delimitation of peripheral territories as part of monitoring trends in spatial and economic development of argo-industrial regions

Vol. 18, Iss. 2, FEBRUARY 2019

Received: 20 September 2018

Received in revised form: 19 November 2018

Accepted: 4 December 2018

Available online: 28 February 2019

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: С12, R11, R12

Pages: 234–251

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.18.2.234

Kazakov M.Yu. North Caucasian Federal University, Stavropol, Russian Federation
info@ncfu.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject The article addresses methodological bases formation to monitor trends in the spatial and economic development of peripheral territories of agro-industrial regions in the South of Russia.
Objectives The study focuses on system diagnostics of the specifics of spatial and economic development of agro-industrial region (the Stavropol Krai) in the context of spatial and economic criteria, delimitation of territories of the near, middle and far periphery.
Methods The study draws on the systems approach, where a region is treated as the core-periphery system. I employ economic and statistical methods, cartographic analysis techniques, the Beauchamp index, the Bavelash index, and the Koenig number method to obtain results.
Results I demarcate the analytical features and spheres of application of spatial and spatial-economic analysis, form a block-structured system of characteristics and indicators of spatial economic analysis and, on this basis, monitor and diagnose current trends in the development of the Stavropol Krai being a typical representative of agro-industrial regions. Based on the combined use of methods for calculating the Beauchamp index, the Bavelash index, and the Koenig number, the paper identifies the near, middle, and far periphery of the region.
Conclusions The findings help identify a high level of centralization in the investigated region. The obtained results can be used by regional authorities and local self-government bodies to develop the sub-federal policy of socio-economic development, taking into account the spatial characteristics of agro-industrial type territories.

Keywords: agro-industrial region, economic space, periphery, spatial analysis

References:

  1. Gritsai O.V., Ioffe G.V., Treivish A.I. Tsentr i periferiya v regional'nom razvitii [The center and the periphery in regional development]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, 168 p.
  2. Zyryanov A.I. [Marginal territories]. Geograficheskii vestnik = Geographical Bulletin, 2008, no. 2, pp. 9–20. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  3. Mishchenko V.V., Mishchenko I.V. [Intra-regional rural territories development: Methodology]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues, 2011, no. 4, pp. 43–49. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Nefedova T.G. [Russia's periphery as a socio-economic phenomenon]. Regional'nye issledovaniya = Regional Research, 2008, no. 5, pp. 14–31. URL: Link.pdf (In Russ.)
  5. Novikov A.N. Prigranichnoe polozhenie Zabaikal'skogo kraya v transgranichnom trekhzvennom regione: rol' v territorial'noi organizatsii naseleniya i khozyaistva [A cross-border position of the Trans-Baikal Territory in the transboundary three-tier region: A role in the territorial organization of the population and the economy]. Chita, Trans-Baikal State University Publ., 2015, 94 p.
  6. Panasyuk M.V., Rudenko A.V. [Analysis of the ‘center-periphery’ systems development of the region (the Republic of Tatarstan case)]. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya, 2008, no. 1, pp. 60–72. (In Russ.)
  7. Starodubrovskaya I.V. Sotsial'naya politika na periferiinykh territoriyakh. Aktual'nye problemy [Social policy in peripheral territories. Urgent problems]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2014, 108 p.
  8. Tolstoguzov O.V. [The typology of peripheral regions and particularly the periphery of the boundary]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2010, no. 47, pp. 6–13. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Lebedinskaya G.A. [About the necessary indicators of spatial development at the level of the Russian Federation and its subjects]. Gradostroitel'stvo = City and Town Planning, 2013, no. 1, pp. 66–73. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  10. Zinatullina O.N. [The analysis of estimation criteria of regional spatial development]. Geograficheskii vestnik = Geographical Bulletin, 2011, no. 2, pp. 9–13. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  11. Semina I.A. et al. Prostranstvennyi analiz i otsenka sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona [Spatial analysis and assessment of socio-economic development of the region]. Saransk, MSU Publ., 2016, 228 p.
  12. Ellison G., Glaeser E. Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, vol. 105, iss. 5, pp. 889–927. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  13. Holmes T.J., Stevens J.J. Geographic Concentration and Establishment Scale. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002, vol. 84, iss. 4, pp. 682–690. URL: Link
  14. Davis D.R., Weinstein D.E. Bones, Bombs and Break Points: The Geography of Economic Activity. The American Economic Review, 2002, vol. 92, iss. 5, pp. 1269–1289. URL: Link
  15. Asheim B.T., Arne Isaksen A. Location, Agglomeration and Innovation: Towards Regional Innovation Systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 1997, vol. 5, iss. 3, pp. 299–330. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 18, Iss. 2
February 2019

Archive