Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Abstracting and Indexing

РИНЦ
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Measuring the efficiency of government support measures for renewable energy and energy efficient economy: A review of approaches

Vol. 18, Iss. 8, AUGUST 2019

Received: 15 May 2019

Received in revised form: 14 June 2019

Accepted: 12 July 2019

Available online: 30 August 2019

Subject Heading: INTEGRATED ECONOMIC-SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

JEL Classification: O44, Q01

Pages: 1428–1447

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.18.8.1428

Ratner S.V. V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences (ICS RAS), Moscow, Russian Federation
lanarat@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-5595

Gomonov K.G. Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation
k.gomonov@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-8664

Subject The article addresses the issues of quantitative assessment of performance of State institutions for fostering the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency.
Objectives We review methods and models for measuring the performance of government mechanisms and direct measures aimed at boosting the renewable energy and energy efficiency.
Methods The study employs methods of bibliographic and comparative analysis.
Results The algorithms of most models in terms of predicting the effect of various stimulating measures for green technologies development lack transparency. This may lead to both deliberate distortion of the results of forecasting and modeling (to promote solutions that are beneficial for certain stakeholder groups) and unintentional errors caused by the focus on socio-economic development patterns, which are specific only to advanced market economies and stable institutional environment.
Conclusions While there are many models for predicting the impact and assessing the efficiency of government incentives for the development of renewable energy and energy efficient technologies, their direct application (without adaptation) in the Russian economy seems inappropriate.

Keywords: economic policy, performance assessment, system dynamics, computable general equilibrium model, social account matrix

References:

  1. Zhou P., Jin R.Y., Fan L.W. Reliability and Economic Evaluation of Power System with Renewables: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, vol. 58, pp. 537–547. URL: Link
  2. Mboumboue E., Njomo D. Potential Contribution of Renewables to the Improvement of Living Conditions of Poor Rural Households in Developing Countries: Cameroon׳s Case Study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, vol. 61, pp. 266–279. URL: Link
  3. Ratner S.V., Klochkov V.V. [Reviewing the effectiveness of equipment manufacturing localization for green energy in Russia]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2015, no. 38, pp. 2–14. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Mezősi A., Szabó L., Szabó S. Cost-Efficiency Benchmarking of European Renewable Electricity Support Schemes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, vol. 98, pp. 217–226. URL: Link
  5. Espinosa M.P., Pizarro-Irizar C. Is Renewable Energy a Cost-Effective Mitigation Resource? An Application to the Spanish Electricity Market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, vol. 94, pp. 902–914. URL: Link
  6. Laleman R., Albrecht J. Comparing Push and Pull Measures for PV and Wind in Europe. Renewable Energy, 2014, vol. 61, pp. 33–37. URL: Link
  7. Huenteler J., Schmidt T.S., Kanie N. Japan's Post-Fukushima Challenge – Implications from the German Experience on Renewable Energy Policy. Energy Policy, 2012, vol. 45, pp. 6–11. URL: Link
  8. Ratner S.V., Iosifov V.V. [Business Feasibility of Energy Engineering for Renewable Energy in Russia]. Vestnik UrFU. Ser.: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management, 2015, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 536–552. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  9. Almastyan N.A., Ratner S.V. [The modern development level of eco-innovation in energy-intensive sectors of economy: Evidence from power engineering]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2018, vol. 14. iss. 6, pp. 1135–1150. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  10. Parry I., Evans D., Oates W. Are Energy Efficiency Standards Justified? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2014, vol. 67, iss. 2, pp. 104–125. URL: Link
  11. Rausch S., Mowers M. Distributional and Efficiency Impacts of Clean and Renewable Energy Standards for Electricity. Resource and Energy Economics, 2014, vol. 36, iss. 2, pp. 556–585. URL: Link
  12. Brennan T.J., Palmer K.L. Energy Efficiency Resource Standards: Economic and Policy. Utilities Policy, 2013, vol. 25, pp. 58–68. URL: Link
  13. Hardisty P. Environmental and Economic Sustainability. New York, NY, CRC Press, 2010, 337 p.
  14. Walz R., Pfaff M., Marscheider-Weidemann F., Glöser-Chahoud S. Innovations for Reaching the Green Sustainable Development Goals – Where will They Come from? International Economics and Economic Policy, 2017, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 449–480. URL: Link
  15. Mikheeva N.N. [Social account matrix: Areas and limitations of use]. EKO = ECO, 2011, no. 6, pp. 103–118. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  16. Zakharchenko N.G. [Using the matrices of social accounts in modeling the economic system structure]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 69–89. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  17. Pyatt G., Round J.I. Social Accounting Matrices for Development Planning. Review of Income and Wealth, 1977, vol. 23, iss. 4, pp. 339–364. URL: Link
  18. Hasegawa R., Kagawa S., Tsukui M. Carbon Footprint Analysis Through Constructing a Multi-Region Input–Output Table: A Case Study of Japan. Journal of Economic Structures, 2015, vol. 4, pp. 5–12. URL: Link
  19. Lenzen M., Pade L.L., Munksgaard J. CO2 Multipliers in Multi-region Input-Output Models. Economic Systems Research, 2004, vol. 16, iss. 4, pp. 391–412. URL: Link
  20. Wiedmann T. A Review of Recent Multi-Region Input–Output Models Used for Consumption-Based Emission and Resource Accounting. Ecological Economics, 2009, vol. 69, iss. 2, pp. 211–222. URL: Link
  21. Li G., Masui T. Assessing the Impacts of China's Environmental Tax Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 208, pp. 316–324. URL: Link
  22. Zhang L., Li Y., Jia Z. Impact of Carbon Allowance Allocation on Power Industry in China's Carbon Trading Market: Computable General Equilibrium Based Analysis. Applied Energy, 2018, vol. 229, pp. 814–827. URL: Link
  23. Bautista S., Espinoza A., Narvaez P. et al. A System Dynamics Approach for Sustainability Assessment of Biodiesel Production in Colombia. Baseline Simulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 213, pp. 1–20. URL: Link
  24. Liu P., Liu C., Du J., Mu D. A System Dynamics Model for Emissions Projection of Hinterland Transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 218, pp. 591–600. URL: Link
  25. Altenburg T., Assmann C. (Eds). Green Industrial Policy: Concept, Policies, Country Experiences. Geneva, Bonn, UN Environment, German Development Institute, 2017. URL: Link
  26. Ibenholt K. Explaining Learning Curves for Wind Power. Energy Policy, 2002, vol. 30, iss. 13, pp. 1181–1189. URL: Link00014-9
  27. Shum K.L. Renewable Energy Deployment Policy: A Transition Management Perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, vol. 73, pp. 1380–1388. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 18, Iss. 8
August 2019

Archive