Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Abstracting and Indexing

–»Ќ÷
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Climate change mitigation and adaptation options in the Russian forestry sector

Vol. 18, Iss. 11, NOVEMBER 2019

Received: 20 August 2019

Received in revised form: 2 September 2019

Accepted: 20 September 2019

Available online: 29 November 2019

Subject Heading: ANALYSIS OF NATURAL CAPITAL

JEL Classification: Q23, Q54

Pages: 2078Ц2102

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.18.11.2078

Chugunkova A.V. Siberian Federal University (SibFU), Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
achugunkova@sfu-kras.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-604X

Subject The article considers the implementation of a set of measures to facilitate the adaptation of forests to future climate risks.
Objectives The aim is to analyze research findings on existing and recommended climate change mitigation and adaptation options applied to tropical and boreal forests, to consider the possibility of adopting these measures in the Russian forestry sector.
Methods The study employs methods of comparative analysis, systematic review of academic literature and other sources, and synthesis of research results.
Results I analyzed the list of climate change mitigation and adaptation options in the forest industry, and revealed that these measures can either strengthen or weaken each othersТ capabilities in practice. The paper demonstrates significant progress in implementing the said options in a number of countries. For instance, the development and promotion of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation UN programme (REDD+) encouraged some developing countries to reduce agricultural expansion at the expense of forests.
Conclusions As for the Russian forestry sector, the application of considered practices, especially in the sphere of adaptation of forest ecosystems to climate change is a key factor in the transition to sustainable forest management.

Keywords: climate change economics, climate change mitigation, adaptation, forestry, REDD+

References:

  1. Porfiriev B. Climate Change: A Hazard or an Opportunity? Environmental Hazards (Special Issue), 2009, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 167Ц170. URL: Link
  2. Chugunkova A.V., Pyzhev A.I., Pyzheva Yu.I. [Influence of global climate change on economy of forestry and agriculture: Risks and opportunities]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava = Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2018, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 523Ц537. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Gordeev R.V., Pyzhev A.I., Zander E.V. [Competitiveness analysis of Russian regions' forest industries]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, 2018, no. 43, pp. 65Ц87. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Virt D.A. [The Paris Agreement as a New Component of the UN Climate Regime]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii = International Organisations Research Journal, 2017, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 185Ц214. URL: Link
  5. Pyzhev A.I., Zander E.V., Pyzheva Yu.I. Analysis of State Forest Policy in Russia. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2014, vol. 7, iss. 8, pp. 1423Ц1432. URL: Link
  6. Korppoo A., Orlov A. Russia's Climate Mitigation Policies: How to Get Them Implemented? Russian Analytical Digest, 2016, no. 185, pp. 5Ц8. URL: Link
  7. Kokorin A. Russia's Post-Paris Climate Policy: Slow Progress and Problems. Russian Analytical Digest, 2016, no. 185, pp. 9Ц14. URL: Link
  8. Samndong R.A., Bush G., Vatn A., Chapman M. Institutional analysis of causes of deforestation in REDD+ pilot sites in the Equateur province: Implication for REDD+ in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Land Use Policy, 2018, vol. 76, pp. 664Ц674. URL: Link
  9. Boucher D., Roquemore S., Fitzhugh E. Brazil's success in reducing deforestation. Tropical Conservation Science (special issue), 2013, vol. 6, iss. 3, pp. 426Ц445. URL: Link
  10. Simonet G., Subervie J. et al. Effectiveness of a REDD+ Project in Reducing Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2019, vol. 101, iss. 1, pp. 211Ц229. URL: Link
  11. Samndong R.A. The Participation Illusion: Questioning Community Participation in a REDD+ Pilot Project in the Democratic Republic of Congo. International Forestry Review, 2018, vol. 20, iss. 3, pp. 390Ц404. URL: Link
  12. Saeed A.-R., McDermott C., Boyd E. Examining equity in Ghana's national REDD+ process. Forest Policy and Economics, 2018, vol. 90, pp. 48Ц58. URL: Link
  13. Shrestha S., Shrestha U.B., Bawa K.S. Contribution of REDD+ payments to the economy of rural households in Nepal. Applied Geography, 2017, vol. 88, pp. 151Ц160. URL: Link
  14. Benjaminsen G., Kaarhus R. Commodification of forest carbon: REDD+ and socially embedded forest practices in Zanzibar. Geoforum, 2018, vol. 93, pp. 48Ц56. URL: Link
  15. West T.A.P. Indigenous community benefits from a de-centralized approach to REDD+ in Brazil. Climate Policy, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 7, pp. 924Ц939. URL: Link
  16. Harada K., Prabowo D. et al. How Can Social Safeguards of REDD+ Function Effectively Conserve Forests and Improve Local Livelihoods? A Case from Meru Betiri National Park, East Java, Indonesia. MDPI Ч Land (Special Issue), 2015, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 119Ц139. URL: Link
  17. Angelsen A., Rudel T.K. Designing and Implementing Effective REDD+ Policies: A Forest Transition Approach. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2013, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 91Ц113. URL: Link
  18. Namaalwa J., Byakagaba P. Analysis of UgandaТs policy and legal framework for the implementation of REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy, 2019, vol. 95, pp. 38Ц45. URL: Link
  19. Larson A.M., Brockhaus M., Sunderlin W.D. et al. Land tenure and REDD+: The good, the bad and the ugly. Global Environmental Change, 2013, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 678Ц689. URL: Link
  20. Ojea E., Loureiro M.L., Alló M., Barrio M. Ecosystem Services and REDD: Estimating the Benefits of Non-Carbon Services in Worldwide Forests. World Development, 2016, vol. 78, pp. 246Ц261. URL: Link
  21. Wang Q., Chen X. Rethinking and reshaping the climate policy: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, vol. 21, pp. 469Ц477. URL: Link
  22. Gardner T.A., Burgess N.D., Aguilar-Amuchastegui N. et al. A framework for integrating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes. Biological Conservation (Special Issue), 2012, vol. 154, pp. 61Ц71. URL: Link
  23. Pattanayak S.K., Wunder S., Ferraro P.J. Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2010, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 254Ц274. URL: Link
  24. Delacote P., Palmer C., Bakkegaard R.K., Thorsen B.J. Unveiling information on opportunity costs in REDD: Who obtains the surplus when policy objectives differ? Resource and Energy Economics, 2014, vol. 36, iss. 2, pp. 508Ц527. URL: Link
  25. Lewis S.L., Wheeler C.E., Mitchard E.T.A., Koch A. Regenerate natural forests to store carbon. Nature, 2019, vol. 568, pp. 25Ц28. URL: Link
  26. Gauthier C., Bernier P. et al. [Boreal forest health and global change]. Ustoichivoe lesopol'zovanie = Sustainable Forestry, 2016, no. 2, pp. 2Ц7. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  27. Mansuy N., Gauthier S., Bergeron Y. Afforestation opportunities when stand productivity is driven by a high risk of natural disturbance: A review of the open lichen woodland in the eastern boreal forest of Canada. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2013, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 245Ц264. URL: Link
  28. Geng A., Yang H., Chen J., Hong Y. Review of carbon storage function of harvested wood products and the potential of wood substitution in greenhouse gas mitigation. Forest Policy and Economics, 2017, vol. 85, part 1, pp. 192Ц200. URL: Link
  29. Guest G., Cherubini F., Strømman A.H. Climate impact potential of utilizing forest residues for bioenergy in Norway. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2013, vol. 18, iss. 8, pp. 1089Ц1108. URL: Link
  30. Tret'yakov A.G. [Assessment of the economic accessibility of forest resources and the processing of low-quality wood]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta = Herald of Omsk University, 2015, no. 1, pp. 142Ц149. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  31. Sathre R., Gustavsson L. Using wood products to mitigate climate change: External costs and structural change. Applied Energy, 2009, vol. 86, iss. 2, pp. 251Ц257. URL: Link
  32. Xu Z., Smyth C.E., Lemprière T.C. et al. Climate change mitigation strategies in the forest sector: biophysical impacts and economic implications in British Columbia, Canada. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2018, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 257Ц290. URL: Link
  33. Favero A., Mendelsohn R., Sohngen B. Using forests for climate mitigation: Sequester carbon or produce woody biomass? Climatic Change, 2017, vol. 144, iss. 2, pp. 195Ц206. URL: Link
  34. Ravindranath N.H. Mitigation and adaptation synergy in forest sector. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2007, vol. 12, iss. 5, pp. 843Ц853. URL: Link
  35. Evans A.M., Perschel R. A review of forestry mitigation and adaptation strategies in the Northeast U.S. Climatic Change, 2009, vol. 96, iss. 1Ц2, pp. 167Ц183. URL: Link
  36. Locatelli B., Pavageau C., Pramova E., Gregorio M.D. Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: Opportunities and trade-offs. WIREs Climate Change, 2015, vol. 6, iss. 6, pp. 585Ц598. URL: Link
  37. Spies T.A., Giesen T.W., Swanson F.J. et al. Climate change adaptation strategies for federal forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA: Ecological, policy, and socio-economic perspectives. Landscape Ecology, 2010, vol. 25, iss. 8, pp. 1185Ц1199. URL: Link
  38. Afreen S., Sharma N., Chaturvedi R.K. et al. Forest policies and programs affecting vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2011, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 177Ц197. URL: Link
  39. Spittlehouse D.L., Stewart R.B. Adaptation to climate change in forest management. Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 2004, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 1Ц11. URL: Link
  40. Noss R.F. Beyond Kyoto: Forest Management in a Time of Rapid Climate Change. Conservation Biology, 2001, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 578Ц590. URL: Link
  41. Murthy I.K., Tiwari R., Ravindranath N.H. Climate change and forests in India: Adaptation opportunities and challenges. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2011, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 161Ц175. URL: Link
  42. Reyer C., Guericke M., Ibisch P.L. Climate change mitigation via afforestation, reforestation and deforestation avoidance: And what about adaptation to environmental change? New Forests, 2009, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 15Ц34. URL: Link
  43. Krankina O.N., Dixon R.K., Kirilenko A.P., Kobak K.I. Global climate change adaptation: Examples from Russian boreal forests. Climatic Change, 1997, vol. 36, iss. 1Ц2, pp. 197Ц215. URL: Link
  44. Goltsev V., Lopatin E. The impact of climate change on the technical accessibility of forests in the Tikhvin District of the Leningrad Region of Russia. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 2013, vol. 24, iss. 2, pp. 148Ц160. URL: Link
  45. Ogden A.E., Innes J.L. Climate change adaptation and regional forest planning in southern Yukon, Canada. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2008, vol. 13, iss. 8, pp. 833Ц861. URL: Link
  46. Grigor'ev A. [Global Climate Change and Its Influence of Canadian Forest Sector: Adaptation measures]. Ustoichivoe lesopol'zovanie = Sustainable Forestry, 2019, no. 1, pp. 21Ц27. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  47. Bolte A., Ammer C., Löf M. et al. Adaptive forest management in central Europe: Climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2009, vol. 24, iss. 6, pp. 473Ц482. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 18, Iss. 11
November 2019

Archive