Subject The article addresses the supranational form of economic development. Objectives We focus on assessing potential and identifying opportunities for supranational form of the Russian economy development with the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States and developed countries. Methods The study draws on the systems approach, using the methods of descriptive statistics, cluster and neural network analysis. Results We identify Russia as an object of the analysis of potential for supranational form of economic development, and the Commonwealth of Independent States and developed countries – as a supranational level. When determining significant clusters of symbiosis of Russian and the CIS economies, we identify a potentially stable cluster with Kazakhstan. As for developed countries, Russia forms a stable cluster with Ireland. The main impediment to active supranational development of the Russian economy is an unacceptable level of exchange rate difference of the national currency and the inflation. Conclusions As a way to face an impending recession, the supranational form of Russian economy development is not a priority, given that it can stabilize only nominal GDP, and only in partnership with Kazakhstan.
Keywords: global economic activity, supranational form of economic development, advanced economy, Commonwealth of Independent States
References:
Glaz'ev S.Yu. [Conceptual Proposals for Practical Implementation of the Big Eurasian Partnership Idea]. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies, 2019, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 6–17. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Glaz'ev S.Yu., Van Ven', Yao Peishen, Ageev A.I. et al. [Assessing the current state and prospects of Russian-Chinese economic cooperation: Exchange of views and joint position of the parties]. Ekonomicheskie strategii = Economic Strategies, 2018, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 22–31. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Glaz'ev S.Yu. [Science on service of the Eurasian integration]. Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika = Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 2018, no. 2, pp. 10–11. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Schuch K., Bonas G., Sonnenburg J. Enhancing science and technology cooperation between the EU and Eastern Europe as well as Central Asia: A critical reflection on the White Paper from a S&T policy perspective. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2012, vol. 1, iss. 3. URL: Link
Radosevic S. Science-industry links in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Conventional policy wisdom facing reality. Science and Public Policy, 2011, vol. 38, iss. 5, pp. 365–378. URL: Link
Malyshev P.Yu. [State-of-the-art and prospects for financial markets’ integration of certain countries of the CIS and Russia]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2016, no. 18, pp. 19–32. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Gurova I.P. [Realizing the potential of mutual trade in the CIS region]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2016, no. 3, pp. 145–155. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Mustafinov R.K. [Implementing the system of multifactorial economic analysis of national power markets in the context of the CIS: Key results]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2019, vol. 15, iss. 9, pp. 1681–1697. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Chepel' S.V. [Energy intensity of development and the preconditions for its limitation: An econometric analysis, with emphasis on CIS countries]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2017, vol. 23, iss. 40, pp. 2420–2436. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Matyushok V.M., Balashova S.A. [On mechanisms and systems for endogenous economic growth strategy implementation in Russia]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2019, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 4–21. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Clark J.R. Russia's Indirect Grand Strategy. Orbis, 2019, vol. 63, iss. 2, pp. 225–239. URL: Link
Richman J., Ayyılmaz N. Can the US and Europe contain Russian power in the European energy market? A game theoretic approach. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2019, vol. 26, no. 100393. URL: Link
Keller J.T., Kuper G.H., Mulder M. Mergers of Germany's natural gas market areas: Is transmission capacity booked efficiently? Utilities Policy, 2019, vol. 56, pp. 104–119. URL: Link
Ozawa M. Trust and Norwegian-Russian energy relations. Energy Research & Social Science, 2016, vol. 16, pp. 111–121. URL: Link
Klomp J. The impact of Russian sanctions on the return of agricultural commodity futures in the EU. Research in International Business and Finance, 2020, vol. 51, no. 101073 (in progress). URL: Link
Yennie-Lindgren W. New dynamics in Japan–Russia energy relations 2011–2017. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2018, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 152–162. URL: Link
Ochoa C., Gore O. The Finnish power market: Are imports from Russia low-cost? Energy Policy, 2015, vol. 80, pp. 122–132. URL: Link
Hvozdenska J. The Application of Sovereign Bond Spreads: The Case of United Kingdom, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Russia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 23, pp. 1227–1232. URL: Link00476-1
Lazar J., Feng J.H., Hochheiser H. Chapter 4: Statistical analysis. In: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Inc., 2017, pp. 71–104. URL: Link
Schofield S. Impressive statistical analysis. Science and Public Policy, 1993, vol. 20, iss. 3, pp. 214–215. URL: Link
Adolfsson A., Ackerman M., Brownstein N.C. To cluster, or not to cluster: An analysis of clusterability methods. Pattern Recognition, 2019, vol. 88, pp. 13–26. URL: Link
Favero L.P., Belfiore P. Chapter 11: Cluster Analysis. In: Data Science for Business and Decision Making. Elsevier Inc., 2019, pp. 311–382. URL: Link
