+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice
 

Contradictions as a potential for the development of a human-oriented economy

Vol. 21, Iss. 12, DECEMBER 2022

Received: 22 September 2022

Received in revised form: 3 October 2022

Accepted: 14 October 2022

Available online: 28 December 2022

Subject Heading: ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT

JEL Classification: O10, P47

Pages: 2201–2225

https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.21.12.2201

Svetlana I. NASYROVA Institute of Education Development of Republic of Bashkortostan, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation
svitland1@rambler.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-755X

Subject. Contradictions in the economic system are in close interaction and interrelation, they are a kind of potential for appropriate transformations. The starting point for progressive development of the economic system is identification of contradictions in a human-oriented economy and their timely resolution.
Objectives. The study aims to identify contradictions arising between the two-component cores of each type of human-centered economy in order to determine possible mode of interaction between the dominant spheres, and to form a direction for further development of the entire economic system.
Methods. The study draws on content analysis, a simple model of a compensatory homeostat.
Results. The paper presents a universal simple model of a compensatory homeostat in a human-oriented economy, reveals the most relevant contradictions within the human-centered economy, when one of the opposite components is the creatosphere, describes interaction modes between components based on types of cross feedback, defines development trajectories of a human-oriented economy in accordance with the modes of interaction between the spheres of the economy, i.e. regressive, isogressive, and progressive branches of development.
Conclusions. The findings enable to diagnose the current state of the human-centered economy, the branches of its development, and formulate a management concept for the economic system transition to a higher level of system complexity. The practical significance of the study is a possibility to make managerial decisions to implement the intended trajectory of human-oriented economy development.

Keywords: human-centered economy, contradiction, progress, regress, isogress

References:

  1. Akhmedzyanova F.K., Galantseva I.V. [Contradictions of the production and financial sectors of the economy for the formation of ways to improve the modern economy’s efficiency]. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta = Herald of Kazan Technological University, 2013, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 218–221. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  2. Grechko M.V., Kobina L.A. [The Evolution of Economic Systems: Dialectic of the Genesis]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2022, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 86–112. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A. Contradiction as a medium and outcome of organizational change: a Foucauldian reading. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2013, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 556–572. URL: Link
  4. Harvey G., Turnbull P., Wintersberger D. Speaking of Contradiction. Work, Employment and Society, 2018, vol. 33, iss. 4. URL: Link
  5. Voronkova O.N. [Contradictions to the development of the modern world economy]. The Scientific Heritage, 2022, no. 82-4, pp. 33–36. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  6. Smirnov E.N. [Post-Pandemic Recovery of the Global Economy]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta = MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 47–71. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Barkhatov V.I. [Contradictions in the world and national economies in the context of technological changes]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2020, no. 6, pp. 44–48. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  8. Khristolyubova N.E. [The role of man in the Russian economy innovational transformation]. Ekonomika, statistika i informatika. Vestnik UMO = Economics, Statistics and Informatics. UMO Bulletin, 2012, no. 4, pp. 102–105. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Nikolaeva E.E. [To the question of the role and the place of the person in digital economy]. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika, 2019, no. 7. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  10. Porokhovskii A.A. [Human and robot: Technologization vs. humanization of noonomy]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival of Russia, 2021, no. 1, pp. 39–47. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  11. Porokhovskii A.A. [Economic theory as a set of basic theories of economics]. Filosofiya khozyaistva, 2016, no. 1, pp. 115–136. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  12. Boush G.D. Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya [Methodology of scientific research]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2020, 227 p.
  13. Astafyev V.I., Gorsky Yu.M., Pospelov D.A. Homeostatics. In: Cybernetics and Applied Systems. New York, Marcel Decker, 1992, pp. 7–22.
  14. Gorskii Yu.M. Osnovy gomeostatiki (Garmoniya i disgarmoniya zhivykh, prirodnykh, sotsial'nykh i iskusstvennykh sistem) [Fundamentals of homeostatics (Harmony and disharmony of living, natural, social and artificial systems)]. Irkutsk, ISEA Publ., 1998, 337 p.
  15. Kil'dyusheva A.A. [Information-cybernetic approach in the study of museum communication]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika = Herald of Omsk University. Series Economics, 2019, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 61–69. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  16. Nasyrova S.I. [Evolutionary aspects of the human-oriented economy in the categorical-system methodology]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika = Moscow University Economics Bulletin, 2021, no. 6, pp. 202–223. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  17. Nasyrova S.I. [Human-oriented economy: Goals and their contradictions]. π-Economy, 2022, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 38–58. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  18. Buzgalin A. [Late capitalism: Capital, worker, creator]. Svobodnaya mysl', 2014, no. 1, pp. 135–146. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  19. Bodrunov S.D. Gryadushchee. Novoe industrial'noe obshchestvo: perezagruzka [Things to Come. The New Industrial Society: Reset]. St. Petersburg, S.Yu. Witte Institute for New Industrial Development Publ., 2016, 328 p.
  20. Gadzhieva A.G. [The modern service sector: Classification and the role in the economy]. Rossiiskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Russian Economic Journal, 2017, no. 6, pp. 67–78. (In Russ.)
  21. Kozlova K.S. Sfera uslug (sotsial'no-filosofskii analiz) [The services sector (socio-philosophical analysis)]. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2012, 128 p.
  22. Kolganov A.I., Buzgalin A.V. [Re-industrialization as nostalgia? Theoretical discourse]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies, 2014, no. 1, pp. 80–94. URL: Link (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 21, Iss. 12
December 2022

Archive