+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice

Population aging and medical robotics

Vol. 21, Iss. 12, DECEMBER 2022

Received: 26 September 2022

Received in revised form: 15 October 2022

Accepted: 1 November 2022

Available online: 28 December 2022

Subject Heading: SCHOLAR DISPUTE

JEL Classification: G34, L19, L93, O33, O57

Pages: 2356–2374


Leonid B. SOBOLEV Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University) (MAI), Moscow, Russian Federation


Subject. The population aging is becoming one of the most significant social challenges of the 21st century. It increases the demand for medicines, diagnostic equipment, and medical staff. An alternative to the growth of medical personnel is the robotization of medical services. However, the robotics is economically justified when the costs of medical robots are lower than the construction of additional medical facilities and training of additional healthcare professionals.
Objectives. I focus on analyzing the medical robots connected with population aging, the link with the global robotics process, and the impact on the medical labor market.
Methods. The study employs general scientific methods to analyze open data sources.
Results. The paper demonstrates the economic feasibility and efficiency of using robots in general and orthopedic surgery, rehabilitation and maintenance of elderly patients.
Conclusions. The medical robotics industry appeared later than the industrial and military segments. However, in recent years, it has been developing at a high rate. Russia lags behind in this area, including in servicing the country's elderly population. To solve this problem, fundamental reforms are required, starting with the system of engineering robotic education, accelerating the development of microelectronics and sensor instrumentation, and reforming the labor market.

Keywords: medical services, medical robot, robotization, supply and demand, non-price determinant of demand


  1. Kapelyushnikov R.I. [The phenomenon of population aging: Major economic effects]. Ekonomicheskaya politika, 2019, vol. 14, no. 2. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  2. Bucher S. [Aging of the population in the Russian Federation: The current trends and indicators]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Herald of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 215–223. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Guang-Zhong Yang et al. The grand challenges of Science Robotics. Science Robotics, 2018, vol. 3, no. 14. URL: Link
  4. Pagliarini L., Lund H.H. The future of Robotics Technology. Journal of Robotics, Networking and Artificial Life, 2017, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 270–273. URL: Link
  5. Gonzalez-Aguirre J.A. et al. Service Robots: Trends and Technology. Applied Sciences, 2021, vol. 11, iss. 22. URL: Link
  6. Petrina A.M. [The state and prospects of robotics development in medicine]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 2: Informatsionnye protsessy i sistemy, 2017, no. 8, pp. 20–30. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Okamura A.M., Mataric M.J., Chistensen H.I. Medical and Health-Care Robotics: Achievements and Opportunities. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2010, vol. 17, iss. 3, pp. 26–37. URL: Link
  8. Collins J.M. et al. Implementation of a standardized robotic assistant surgical training curriculum. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 789–797. URL: Link
  9. Poduraev Yu.V. [Approach and Experience of Designing Medical Collaborative Robotics for Laser Surgery and Bio-Printing]. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie, 2017, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 749–752. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  10. Beasley R.A. Medical Robots: Current Systems and Research Directions. Journal of Robotics, 2012, Article ID 401613. URL: Link
  11. Dupont P.E., Nelson B.J. et al. A decade retrospective of medical robotics research from 2010 to 2020. Science Robotics, 2021, vol. 6, no. 60. URL: Link
  12. Jinxing Li, Esteban-Fernández de Ávila B., Wei Gao et al. Micro/nanorobots for biomedicine: Delivery, surgery, sensing, and detoxification. Science Robotics, 2017, vol. 2, no. 4. URL: Link
  13. Taylor R.H. A perspective on medical robotics. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2006, vol. 94, iss. 9, pp. 1652–1664. URL: Link
  14. Graur F., Radu E. et al. Surgical Robotics – Past, Present and Future. In: Husty M., Hofbaur M. (eds) New Trends in Medical and Service Robots. MESROB 2016. Mechanisms and Machine Science, 2018, vol. 48. Springer, Cham. URL: Link
  15. Chen Yuyang, Shu'an Zhang et al. Review of surgical robotic systems for keyhole and endoscopic procedures: State of the art and perspectives. Frontiers of Medicine, 2020, vol. 14, iss. 4, pp. 382–403. URL: Link
  16. Fei Yu, Lan Li et al. Robots in orthopedic surgery. Annals of Joint, 2018, vol. 3, no. 3. URL: Link
  17. Nolan K.J., Karunakaran K.K. et al. Utilization of Robotic Exoskeleton for Overground Walking in Acute and Chronic Stroke. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 2021, vol. 15. URL: Link
  18. Broekens J., Heerink M., Rosendal H. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology, 2009, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 94–103. URL: Link
  19. Jiang J., Huang Z. et al. Research Progress and Prospect of Nursing Robot. Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering, 2018, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 41–57. URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8725 (Online)
ISSN 2073-039X (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 21, Iss. 12
December 2022