Murtazina G.R.University of Management TISBI, Kazan State University of Culture and Arts, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation gulamur@mail.ru
Vesloguzova M.V.University of Management TISBI, Volga Region State Academy of Physical Culture, Sport and Tourism, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation mariaves@mail.ru
Importance As part of the research, we analyze the current trends in cluster structures' consumption of human capital during modernization of the Russian economy and relevant changes. Objectives The research determines how cluster structures influence the efficiency of human capital use. Clusters shall mean a combination of entities, suppliers of equipment, components, specialized production and maintenance services, R&D and educational institutions, which are geographically and functionally related in production and sale of goods and services. Methods We applied methods of theoretical and empirical study to reach the above objective. Results We determined specifics that influence the growth in efficiency of human capital use in clusters, identified and described indicators of these processes. Conclusions and Relevance The importance of clustering grows in the Russian economy, especially considering an increase in inner regional disparities, zero access of some regions and areas to innovation resources, and shortage of such innovation resources. As the industrially developed regions prove, clustering lays the basis for generating a synergistic effect, since it accumulates various resources, including human capital, several leading cities located within clusters.
Keywords: human capital, consumption, cluster structure, efficiency
References:
Biryukov A.V. Preimushchestva sovremennykh innovatsionnykh klasterov [The advantages of modern innovative clusters]. Transportnoe delo Rossii = Transport Business of Russia, 2009, no. 1, pp. 40–41.
Vagizova V.I. Klasterizatsiya kak innovatsionnaya forma diversifikatsii khozyaistvennykh sistem i faktor povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti ekonomiki Tatarstana [Clusterization as an innovative form of economic system diversification and a factor of competitiveness increase in the Tatarstan economy]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, 2009, no. 4, pp. 336–339.
Dezhina I.G. Tekhnologicheskie platformy i innovatsionnye klastery v Rossii – vmeste ili porozn'? [Technological platforms and innovation clusters in Russia: together or apart?]. Innovatsii = Innovation, 2013, no. 2, pp. 35–43.
Zakirov N.I. Strategicheskoe razvitie traditsionno-innovatsionnykh klasterov v ekonomike Respubliki Tatarstan [Strategic development of tradition-and-innovation clusters in the economy of Tatarstan]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, 2009, no. 4, pp. 340–342.
Murtazina G.R. Institutsional'nye lovushki potrebleniya chelovecheskogo kapitala [Institutional traps of human capital use]. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava = Problems of Economics and Law, 2013, no. 7, pp. 56–60.
Murtazina G.R. Upravlenie chelovecheskim kapitalom: institutsional'nyi aspekt potrebleniya: monografiya [Human capital management: the institutional aspect of consumption: a monograph]. Kazan, Otechestvo Publ., 2014.
Nakaryakov D.P. Preimushchestva klasternykh system i perspektivy ikh razvitiya v Rossii [Advantages of cluster systems and their development prospects in Russia]. Ekonomika i menedzhment innovatsionnykh tekhnologii = Economy and Management of Innovation Technologies, 2012, no. 8. Available at: Link. (In Russ.) (accessed 10.10.2014)
Rykhtik M.I. Natsional'naya innovatsionnaya sistema SShA: istoriya formirovaniya, politicheskaya praktika, strategiya razvitiya [The National innovation system of the United States of America: history of formation, political practice, development strategy]. Nizhny Novgorod, State University of Nizhny Novgorod Publ., 2011, 23 p.
Tuguskina G. Otsenka effektivnosti investitsii v chelovecheskii kapital predpriyatii [Evaluating the efficiency of investment in human capital of enterprises]. Upravlenie personalom = Personnel Management, 2009, no. 3, pp. 73–77.
Bagautdinova N.G., Fazlieva E.P., Murtazina G.R., Naida A.M. Improvement of the Regional Management System Using the Labor Potential Index. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2013, no. 27(1).
Barro R.J. Economic Growth in Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 407–443.
Ben-Porath Y. The Production of Human Capital and Life Cycle of Earnings. TheJournal of Political Economy, 1967, vol. 75, no. 4-1, pp. 352–365.
De la Fuente A., Jimeno J.F. The Private and Fiscal Returns to Schooling and the Effect of Public Policies on Private Incentives to Invest in Education: A General Framework and Same Results for the EU. CESifo Working Paper, 2005, January, no. 1392.
Grant R. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, vol. 17, iss. S2, pp. 109–112.
Hanushek E. Publicly Provided Education. In: Handbook of Public Economics. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science B.V., 2002.
Joshua C. Hall Positive Externalities and Government Involvement in Education. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 2006, vol. 22, no. 2.
