Subject. This article discusses the issues related to environmental, social and governance activities of companies, and their financial and investment indicators. Objectives. The article aims to assess the environmental, social and governance activities impact on the financial and investment performance of Russian companies. Methods. The empirical data contains observations on 56 Russian public companies evaluated within the framework of the ESG ranking by the RAEX Rating Agency. To assess the correlation between social, environmental, governance factors and financial and investment components of the activities of Russian corporations, a correlation matrix and panel regression based on panel data were constructed. Results. The article finds that a higher S-ranking has a positive effect on the financial leverage of the company, and E-, S- and G-rankings have a positive effect on the dividend yield. The results obtained are the theoretical basis for the development of agency and signal theories of corporate finance, and they are also applicable in practice to assess risk. Conclusions and Relevance. Shareholders should pay attention to the ESG performance indicators of their companies. Companies can use the results of the study to identify priority areas for the development of their activities.
Fedorova E.A., Shuvarikov M.D. [The impact of CEO education on the investment attractiveness of companies]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2023, vol. 29, iss. 12, pp. 2670–2692. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Ferrell O.C., Harrison D.E., Ferrell L., Hair J.F. Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 2019, vol. 95, pp. 491–501. URL: Link
Park J., Lee H., Kim C. Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers' perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 2014, vol. 67, iss. 3, pp. 295–302. URL: Link
Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 2006, vol. 84, iss.12, pp. 78–92. URL: Link
Lee K.H., Cin B., Lee E.Y. Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2014, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 40–53. URL: Link
Bofinger Y., Heyden K.J., Rock B. Corporate social responsibility and market efficiency: Evidence from ESG and misvaluation measures. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2022, vol. 134, no. 106322, pp. 15–23. URL: Link
Hartzmark S.M., Sussman A.B. Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 2019, vol. 74, iss. 6, pp. 2789–2837. URL: Link
Zakhmatov D.Yu., Valitov G.Sh. [The influence of esg factors on the market capitalization of Russian companies]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School, 2022, no. 3, pp. 183–192. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Izgarova A.I., Rogova E.M., Bakhareva O.V. [ESG investment relationship with financial performance of Russian companies]. Upravlenets, 2023, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 17–29. (In Russ.) URL: Link
