Finance and Credit

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Prospect theory: The framework and application areas

Vol. 25, Iss. 4, APRIL 2019

Received: 19 February 2019

Received in revised form: 11 March 2019

Accepted: 25 March 2019

Available online: 26 April 2019

Subject Heading: THEORY OF FINANCE

JEL Classification: C9, C92, D81, D90, G02

Pages: 755–768

Bogatyrev S.Yu. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation

Subject The paper examines the Prospect theory, as well as the tools and research methods of behavioral finance based on this theory.
Objectives I am to allocate the most important elements of the Prospect theory and show their development and practical implementation in modern conditions.
Methods The study uses the method of historical periodization, historical-systemic and historical-comparative methods. It also applies methods of formal logic, such as: analysis, synthesis, induction, hypothesis.
Results The fundamentals of Prospect theory described in the article are guidelines for setting up practical research in the field of finance to take into account the fundamental assumptions underlying the behavior of persons taking financial decisions in the face of risk and uncertainty in obtaining benefits or losses.
Conclusions and Relevance The article outlines the directions and areas of application of the Prospect theory in the Russian financial research practice. One can apply the research results to analyze the behavior of investors in the stock market and in corporate finance in terms of crisis. The practical and experimental components are little developed and need further research.

Keywords: behavioral finance, financial policy, utility, heuristics, Prospect theory


  1. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 1979, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–292. URL: Link
  2. Green T. Clifton, Byoung-Hyoun Hwang. Initial Public Offerings as Lotteries: Skewness Preference and First-Day Returns. Management Science, 2012, vol. 58, iss. 2, pp. 432–444. URL: Link
  3. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, vol. 5, iss. 4, pp. 297–323. URL: Link
  4. Gilovich T., Griffin D., Kahneman D. Heuristics & Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 548–558.
  5. Kahneman D., Frederick S. Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In: Gilovich T., Griffin D., Kahneman D. Heuristics & Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 49–81.
  6. Koszegi B., Rabin M. A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2006, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 1133–1165. URL: Link
  7. Odean T. Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? The Journal of Finance, 1998, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1775–1798. URL: Link
  8. Fama E.F., French K.R. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 25–46. URL: Link
  9. Barberis N., Huang M., Santos T. Prospect Theory and Asset Prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, vol. 116, iss. 1, pp. 1–53. URL: Link
  10. Boyer B., Mitton T., Vorkink K. Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness. The Review of Financial Studies, 2009, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 169–202. URL: Link
  11. Eraker B., Ready M. Do Investors Overpay for Stocks with Lottery-like Payoffs? An Examination of the Returns on OTC Stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, vol. 115, iss. 3, pp. 486–504. URL: Link
  12. Mitton T., Vorkink K. Equilibrium Underdiversification and the Preference for Skewness. The Review of Financial Studies, 2007, vol. 20, iss. 4, pp. 1255–1288. URL: Link
  13. Benartzi S., Previtero A., Thaler R.H. Annuitization Puzzles. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2011, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 143–164.
  14. Andries M. Consumption-based Asset Pricing with Loss Aversion, 2012. URL: Link
  15. Sydnor J. (Over)insuring Modest Risks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2010, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 177–199. URL: Link
  16. Knetsch J.L. The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. The American Economic Review, 1989, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 1277–1284. URL: Link
  17. List J.A. Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, vol. 118, iss. 1, pp. 41–71. URL: Link
  18. List J.A. Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace. Econometrica, 2004, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 615–625. URL: Link
  19. Benartzi S., Thaler R.H. Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 73–92. URL: Link
  20. Kahneman D., Frederick S. Frames and Brains: Elicitation and Control of Response Tendencies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 45–46. URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 25, Iss. 4
April 2019