Finance and Credit

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Assessing the performance of Russia's State-partnered banking institutions and major private banks using the DEA method

Vol. 25, Iss. 8, AUGUST 2019

Received: 22 July 2019

Received in revised form: 5 August 2019

Accepted: 19 August 2019

Available online: 30 August 2019

Subject Heading: Banking

JEL Classification: C67, G14, G17, G21

Pages: 1742–1756

Gasanov O.S. Don State Technical University (DSTU), Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation

Medyukha E.V. Don State Technical University (DSTU), Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation

Subject This article considers the effectiveness of parastatal banking institutions' use of the resources at their disposal, i.e. capital, assets, labor resources, etc.
Objectives The article aims to compare the performance of partially State-owned banks and major private banks.
Methods For the study, we used the DEA procedure based on the convex function application, and the CCR and ER models.
Results The article tells about the comparable effectiveness of Russian partially State-owned banking institutions and largest private banks both in the implementation of the main functions of banks and in the formation of final financial results.
Relevance The results obtained can be used when forming the Bank of Russia's policy of banking system development and decision-making on privatization of State-owned banking institutions.

Keywords: Russian banks, government-owned banks, large private banks, comparative analysis, efficiency, DEA modeling


  1. Dombrovskaya E.N. [Public entrepreneurship: its role in the economy and the finance system of Russia]. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law, 2015, no. 1, pp. 84–91. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  2. Saginov Yu.L., Zav'yalov D.V. [Public entrepreneurship in the automotive industry]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2017, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 295–302. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  3. Shleifer A. State Versus Private Ownership. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 133–150. URL: Link
  4. Abramov A., Radygin A., Chernova M. State-Owned Enterprises in the Russian Market: Ownership Structure and Their Role in the Economy. Russian Journal of Economics, 2017, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–23. URL: Link
  5. Stadnik A.M. [State participation in the capital of banks: pros and cons]. Kazanskaya nauka = Kazan Science, 2012, no. 2, pp. 114–121. (In Russ.)
  6. Stadnik A.M. [Banks with State participation in the world context on the example of Member States of BRICS]. Kazanskaya nauka = Kazan Science, 2013, no. 4, pp. 83–90. (In Russ.)
  7. Tavasiev A.M. [State-owned and partially State-owned banks are necessary]. Bankovskoe delo = Banking, 2016, no. 12, pp. 42–45. (In Russ.)
  8. Andrews A.M. State-Owned Banks, Stability, Privatization, and Growth: Practical Policy Decisions in a World Without Empirical Proof. IMF Working Paper, 2005, no. 05/10, 54 p. URL: Link
  9. Vernikov A.V., Mamonov M.E. [Which banks and why lend long-term in Russia?]. EKO = ECO, 2016, no. 9, pp. 135–150. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  10. Chernykh L., Theodossiou A. Determinants of Bank Long-term Lending Behavior: Evidence from Russia. Multinational Finance Journal, 2011, vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 193–216. URL: Link
  11. Sapienza P. The Effects of Government Ownership on Bank Lending. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, vol. 72, iss. 2, pp. 357–384. URL: Link
  12. La Porta R., López de Silanes F., Shleifer A. Government Ownership of Banks. Journal of Finance, 2002, vol. 57, iss. 1, pp. 265–301. Available at SSRN: Link
  13. Vanteeva N., Hickson C. Gerschenkron Revisited: The New Corporate Russia. Journal of Economic Issues, 2015, vol. 49, iss. 4, pp. 978–1007. URL: Link
  14. Pak O. The Impact of State Ownership and Business Models on Bank Stability: Empirical Evidence from the Eurasian Economic Union. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2019, vol. 71, pp. 161–175. URL: Link
  15. Farrell M.J. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1957, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 253–290. URL: Link
  16. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, vol. 2, iss. 6, pp. 429–444. URL: Link90138-8
  17. Ashrafi A., Jaafar A.B., Lee L.S. Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis: An Enhanced Russell Measure Model. In: 2010 International Conference on Business and Economics Research. IACSIT Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2011, vol. 1. URL: Link
  18. Fedotov Yu.V. [Organizational Performance Measurement: Principles of DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) Approach]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2012, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 51–62. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  19. Kahveçi E., Taliyev R. The Disclosure Behavior and Performance of Russian Firms: Public Disclosure Index and DEA Application. Research Journal of Business and Management, 2016, vol. 3, iss. 3, pp. 257–266. URL: Link
  20. Kahveçi E., Wolfs B. Digital Banking Impact on Turkish Deposit Banks Performance. Banks and Bank Systems, 2018, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 48–57. URL: Link.2018.05
  21. Ozkan-Gunay E.N., Tektas A. Efficiency Analysis of the Turkish Banking Sector in Precrisis and Crisis Period: A DEA Approach. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2006, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 418–431. URL: Link
  22. Burkina N.V., Naumova M.A. [Application of Distribution-free Methods of Study for Identifying the Degree of Reliability of Ukrainian Banks]. Бізнес Інформ, 2014, no. 3, pp. 104–109. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  23. Knyazev A.V. [State lending to the agricultural sector of the economy]. APK: Ekonomika i upravlenie = AIC: Economics and Management, 2010, no. 1, pp. 51–55. URL: Link (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 25, Iss. 8
August 2019