International Accounting

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Development of a mathematical apparatus for consolidated accounting

Vol. 20, Iss. 5, MARCH 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 11 October 2016

Received in revised form: 23 November 2016

Accepted: 7 December 2016

Available online: 15 March 2017


JEL Classification: C81, G34, M41

Pages: 258-280

Izhevskii V.L. Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University; Economist, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation

Kononov V.N. Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russian Federation

Subject Effective functioning of any accounting system depends on the accuracy and clarity of the used algorithms and mathematical tools. The research focuses on the issue of formalization of consolidated accounting.
Objectives The study aims to formalize mathematical tools and supporting algorithms for consolidated accounting systems in groups of companies.
Methods The International Financial Reporting Standards basic provisions relating to groups and associations of companies are the methodological basis of the study. As well, we used algorithmic methods and the methods of mathematical modeling of economic systems and processes.
Results We present formalized mathematical techniques and supporting algorithms for consolidated accounting systems in groups of companies.
Conclusions and Relevance Consolidated accounting systems must be able to address the full range of tasks related to the management of the group of companies. Mathematical tools and supporting algorithms should be regarded as a recipe for successful implementing the consolidation procedures in practice. The results of this research can be applied when forming systems of consolidated financial and management accounting in the group of companies, as well as developing software for such systems.

Keywords: consolidated accounting, consolidation, mathematical techniques, consolidated reporting


  1. Moonitz M. The Entity Theory of Consolidated Statements. Brooklyn, NY, The Foundation Press Inc., 1951.
  2. Childs W.H. Consolidated Financial Statements: Principles and Procedures. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1949.
  3. Carson J.A. Accounting for Mergers and Consolidations. The Canadian Chartered Accountant, LXXIV, April 1959.
  4. Pattillo J.W. Consolidated Financial Statements: Theory and Utility. Texas Technological College, August 1959, 208 p.
  5. Izhevskii V.L., Kononov V.N. [Determining the influence of consolidated financial statements data on financial statements users’ decision-making]. Molodoi uchenyi = Young Scientist, 2016, no. 10, pp. 707–712. (In Russ.)
  6. Burlakova O.V. [Development of consolidated accounting in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Orenburg State University, 2011, no. 13(132), pp. 115–120. (In Russ.)
  7. Salmi T., Heikkilä M. Determination of Majority and Minority Interest Percentages for Consolidated Financial Statements. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 1978, no. Special Edition 1, pp. 8–28.
  8. Brioschi F., Buzzacchi L., Colombo M. Risk Capital Financing and the Separation of Ownership and Control in Business Groups. Journal of Banking and Finance, Special Issue, 1989, no. 13, pp. 747–772.
  9. Baldone S., Brioschi F., Paleari S. Ownership Measures Among Firms Connected by Cross-shareholdings and a Further Analogy with Input-Output Theory. 4th JAFEE International Conference on Investment and Derivatives, 1998.
  10. Glattfelder J. Decoding Complexity: Uncovering Patterns in Economic Networks. Springer, 2013.
  11. Chapelle A., Szafarz A. Ownership and Control: Dissecting the Pyramid. Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Solvay Business School, Centre Emile Bernheim: Research Institute in Management Sciences. Working Paper: WP-CEB 03/002, December, 2002.
  12. Chapelle A. Separation Between Ownership and Control: Where Do We Stand? Corporate Ownership & Control, Winter 2005, vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 91–101.
  13. Almeida H., Park S.Y., Subrahmanyam M.G., Wolfenzon D. The Structure and Formation of Business Groups: Evidence from Korean Chaebols. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, vol. 99, iss. 2, pp. 447–475. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.017
  14. Dagwell R., Wines G.L., Lambert C. Corporate Accounting in Australia. 4th edition. Sydney, University of New South Wales Press, 2007.
  15. Vlasova I.E., Vlasova I.A. [Calculating the paper profit of a group of companies as an element of the method of financial statement consolidation]. Upravlenets = The Manager, 2014, no. 1(47), pp. 36–40. (In Russ.)
  16. Arnold J., Egginton D., Kirkham L., Macve R., Peasnell K. Goodwill and Other Intangibles: Theoretical Considerations and Policy Issues. London, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 1992.
  17. Choi F.D.S. (Ed.). International Finance and Accounting Handbook. 3-rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, September 2003, 888 p.
  18. Zeff S.A. The Entity Theory of Recording Goodwill in Business Combinations: Old Stuff. The CPA Journal, October 2005, vol. 75, no. 10.
  19. Clark M.W. Evolution of Concepts of Minority Interest. The Accounting Historians Journal, June 1993, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–78.
  20. Kononov V.N., Brykov S.S., Izhevskii V.L. [Adaptation of methods of reporting of consolidated groups for business clusters and their use in the cost-effectiveness analysis]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya Ekonomika i menedzhment = Bulletin of South Ural State University. Ser.: Economics and Management, 2016, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 7–17. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14529/em160301

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 5
May 2019