International Accounting
 

Abstracting and Indexing

РИНЦ
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Evaluating the efficiency of State control over the accurate assessment and timely payment of corporation tax

Vol. 22, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2019

Received: 22 April 2016

Received in revised form: 23 May 2016

Accepted: 23 June 2016

Available online: 16 January 2019

Subject Heading: Tax and taxation

JEL Classification: C51, H21, H25, H83

Pages: 49–70

https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.22.1.49

Yashina N.I. National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (UNN), Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
sitnicof@mail.ru

ORCID id: not available

Aleksandrov E.E. National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (UNN), Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
aee152@yandex.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject Enhancing the quality of tax control is a significant tool to maintain budget stability, especially under the three-year moratorium on the increase in tax burden. The article considers the issue of increasing the efficiency of corporation tax audit, given the significance of the tax for federal and regional budgets.
Objectives The purpose of the study is to develop methods for evaluating the efficiency of control over the correct assessment and timely payment of corporation tax.
Methods We use both general and special research techniques. The comprehensive assessment of efficiency rests on methods for building composite indicators. We also use the methods of applied statistics, in particular, a discriminate function analysis.
Results We offer various approaches to composite indicators building to measure the efficiency of tax audits of corporation tax payment. Based on the values of composite indicators, we classify the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and form stable typological groups. The tools of discriminant analysis helped determine the probability of regions' affiliation with relevant groups.
Conclusions It is crucial to further improve the methods of control and audit activities. If implemented at the territorial level, the offered measures may enhance the efficiency of corporation tax audits.

Keywords: tax control, efficiency, integrated index, corporation tax, tax audit

References:

  1. Shcherbinin A.T. [On assessment of efficiency of tax bodies' performance or taxation]. Nalogovyi vestnik = Tax Bulletin, 2007, no. 1, pp. 24–26. (In Russ.)
  2. Vasil'eva M.V. [Evaluating the efficiency of tax control exercised by tax authorities]. Upravlencheskii uchet = Management Accounting, 2011, no. 4, pp. 66–73. (In Russ.)
  3. Anisimov A.L. [The efficiency of tax administration in the tax system of the Russian Federation]. Izvestiya UrGEU = Journal of Ural State University of Economics, 2015, no. 1, pp. 24–30. (In Russ.)
  4. Kartashova G.N. [On assessing the efficiency of tax bodies' performance or a conceptual approach to certain aspects of analytical work in the taxation sphere]. Nalogovyi vestnik = Tax Bulletin, 1999, no. 1, pp. 17–18. (In Russ.)
  5. Deputatova I.V. [Methodology for complex analysis of control activities of tax authorities]. Upravlencheskii uchet = Management Accounting, 2011, no. 12, pp. 26–32. (In Russ.)
  6. Rebresh L.A. [Issues of assessment of tax control efficiency]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2004, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 118–123. (In Russ.)
  7. Fedorovskaya M.A. [Effectiveness and efficiency of tax bodies’ performance]. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2011, no. 3, pp. 123–126. (In Russ.)
  8. Dorofeeva N.A., Suvorov A.V. [On tax inspections performance evaluation]. Bukhgalterskii uchet v stroitel'nykh organizatsiyakh = Accounting in Construction Companies, 2010, no. 7, pp. 59–65. (In Russ.)
  9. Resh V.K., Alekhin S.N. [On developing a methodology for evaluating the efficiency of tax authorities]. Nalogovyi vestnik = Tax Bulletin, 1999, no. 1, pp. 12–15. (In Russ.)
  10. Naidenov A.S., Chusova A.E. [A comparative analysis of tax administration system in Russian regions]. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2011, no. 3, pp. 268–272. (In Russ.)
  11. Fuentes R., Lillo-Bañuls A. Smoothed Bootstrap Malquist Index Based on DEA Model to Compute Productivity of Tax Offices. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, vol. 42, iss. 5, pp. 2242–2450. URL: Link
  12. Førsund F.R., Edvardsen D.F., Kittelsen S.A.C. Productivity of Tax Offices in Norway. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2015, vol. 43, iss. 3, pp. 269–279. URL: Link
  13. Barros C.P. Technical and Allocative Efficiency of Tax Offices: A Case Study. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2007, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 41–61.
  14. Katharaki M., Tsakas M. Assessing the Efficiency and Managing the Performance of Greek Tax Offices. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 2010, vol. 7(1), pp. 58–75.
  15. Moesen W., Persoons A. Measuring and Explaining the Productive Efficiency of Tax Offices: A Non-Parametric Best Practice Frontier Approach. Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management, 2002, vol. XLVII, iss. 3, pp. 399–416.
  16. Thirtle C., Shankar B., Chitkara P., Chatterjee S., Mohanty M.S. Size Does Matter: Technical and Scale Efficiency in Indian State Tax Jurisdictions. Review of Development Economics, 2000, vol. 4, iss. 3, pp. 340–352. URL: Link
  17. Barros C.P. Performance Measurement in Tax Offices with a Stochastic Frontier Model. Journal of Economic Studies, 2005, vol. 32, iss. 6, pp. 497–510.
  18. Jha R., Sahni B.S. Tax Efficiency and Productivity Analysis: The Case of Canadian Fiscal Federalism. Public Finance, 1997, vol. 52, iss. 2, pp. 186–197.
  19. Lewis B.D. Local Government Taxation: An Analysis of Administrative Cost Inefficiency. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 2006, vol. 42, iss. 2, pp. 213–233.
  20. Fisher O.V., Nadtochii E.V. [Indicators of performance evaluation of on-site tax audits of sole proprietors]. Alma Mater, 2009, no. 8, pp. 34–39. (In Russ.)
  21. Aristarkhova M.K., Voronina A.N. [Improving the management of tax audit implementation]. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region, 2011, no. 3, pp. 147–154. (In Russ.)
  22. Jacobs R., Smith P., Goddard M. Measuring Performance: An Examination of Composite Performance Indicators. York, UK, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 2004, 124 p. URL: Link
  23. Yashina N.I., Tabakov A.A., Roganova S.Yu. Analiz territorial'nykh byudzhetov: sovershenstvovanie metodologicheskikh i prakticheskikh aspektov [The analysis of territorial budgets: Improving the methodological and practical aspects]. Nizhny Novgorod, Volga-Vyatka Academy of Public Administration Publ., 2006, 161 p.
  24. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD, European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2008, 162 p.
  25. Raiskaya N.N., Sergienko Ya.V., Frenkel' A.A. [The use of integral indices in economic cycles analysis]. Voprosy statistiki = Voprosy Statistiki, 2012, no. 12, pp. 16–20. (In Russ.)
  26. Raiskaya N.N., Sergienko Ya.V., Frenkel' A.A. [Rating of regions by integrated index of investment attractiveness]. Voprosy Statistiki, 2009, no. 1, pp. 56–60. (In Russ.)
  27. Gupta S., Wilton P.C. Combination of Forecasts: An Extension. Management Science, 1987, vol. 33, iss. 3, pp. 356–372.
  28. Saaty T. Prinyatie reshenii. Metod analiza ierarkhii [Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process]. Moscow, Radio i svyaz' Publ., 1993, 278 p.
  29. Ho R. Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis with IBM SPSS. Boca Raton, Florida, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2014, 572 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 22, Iss. 4
April 2019

Archive