Troshin D.V.Institute of Problems of Economic Security and Strategic Planning of Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation giopup2@yandex.ru
Vorozhikhin V.V.Institute of Problems of Economic Security and Strategic Planning of Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation vorozhikhin@mail.ru
Importance In the present-day conditions, the selection of innovative development of the Russian economy is the most burning issue to enhance the innovative activities of economic agents and to create favorable conditions for their development as innovators. For this purpose, we propose a method and tools for the efficient implementation of innovation potential.Objectives The purpose is to support innovation on the basis of use of the personal and professional communications of innovators and stakeholders using network functionality and automation of the processes of accumulation and use of knowledge.Methods The article describes the formation of a single information field that supports the development of an innovation-based automated control system. We substantiate the creation of a self-organizing knowledge space and self-organizing project teams for the development and adaptive management of innovation projects, the so called open innovation. The article describes the design of creation and development of the system, including its objectives, functions, principles of operation and development, composition, and the basic operation scenarios. The implementation of the system will make it possible to reduce the barriers of innovation development by increasing the density of connections between stakeholders, forming a comprehensive description of innovative proposals and providing access to them, the interactive exchange of information on emerging issues. In addition, the offered mechanisms for determining the participants' ratings, models and other objects and entities of the system, the accumulation of knowledge allow realizing a self-development system. There is no limit on the number of development centers in the proposed system. Their influence should be determined depending on objectively created ratings. Results The findings of the article, in practical terms, can significantly improve the effectiveness of the national innovation system and fill in the missing or fix uncompetitive links of the innovation chain. Conclusions and Relevance The proposed model provides the possibility of the flexible formation of megaprojects on the basis of completed and the most significant innovation projects, as well as their management through the redistribution of the resources and time of implementation of the individual components.
Keywords: innovation project, information system, expert, model, verification, knowledge base, user
References:
Bagrinovskii K.A., Khrustalev E.Yu. Metodologiya i model'nyi instrumentarii upravleniya nauchno-tekhnicheskimi programmami [A methodology and modeling toolkit of management of scientific and technical programs]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' – National interests: priorities and security, 2014, no. 32, pp. 2–13.
Volokhov V.M., Prokhorov A.I., Amosova E.S. Ontologicheskaya model' predmetnoi oblasti informatsionnoi sistemy podderzhki innovatsionnykh razrabotok institutov RAN [The ontological model of the subject area of information system to support innovation institutions of the RAS]. Informatsionnye resursy Rossii – Information resources of Russia, 2011, no. 3, pp. 27–32.
Deming W.E. Novaya ekonomika [The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2008, 208 p.
Zinov V.G., Kuznetsov L.V., Lebedeva T.Ya. Ekspress-analiz (audit) kommertsializuemosti naukoemkikh tekhnologii s pomoshch'yu KASTA-2 [An express-analysis (audit) of commercial marketing of knowledge-based technologies using CASTA-2]. Innovatsii – Innovation, 2010, no. 3, pp. 91–93.
Kachalov R.M. Upravlenie khozyaistvennym riskom [Managing business risk]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2002, 192 p.
Kleiner G.B. Strategiya predpriyatiya [Strategy of an enterprise]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2008, 568 p.
Kozhev A.V. Vvedenie v chtenie Gegelya. Ideya smerti v filosofii Gegelya [Introduction to the reading of Hegel. The idea of death in Hegel's philosophy]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1998, 208 p.
Kosenko I.I. et al. Modelirovanie i virtual'noe prototipirovanie: uchebnoe posobie [Simulation and virtual prototyping: a textbook]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2012, 176 p.
Lovtsov D.A., Bogdanova M.V. Ekonomiko-pravovoe regulirovanie oborota rezul'tatov intellektual'noi deyatel'nosti predpriyatii promyshlennosti Rossii [Economic and legal regulation of the circulation of the results of intellectual activities of Russian industrial enterprises]. Ekonomika, statistika i informatika – Economics, statistics and informatics, 2013, no. 3, pp. 55–59.
Martov S.N. Kompleksnyi podkhod k razrabotke informatsionnoi infrastruktury dlya deyatel'nosti malykh innovatsionnykh predpriyatii biznesa [An integrated approach to the information infrastructure development for small innovative enterprises]. Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie – Region: systems, economics, management, 2012, no. 4, pp. 108–113.
Mitrofanov E.P. Metodologicheskie osnovy informatsionnogo obespecheniya razvitiya regional'nykh innovatsionnykh podsistem [The methodological fundamentals of information support for the regional innovation sub-systems development]. Moscow, Dashkov i Ko. Publ., 2012, 351 p.
Nekrasov D.A. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v upravlenii innovatsiyami organizatsii [Information technologies in innovation management of the organization]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
Neave H.R. Organizatsiya kak sistema: printsipy postroeniya ustoichivogo biznesa Edvardsa Deminga [The Deming Dimension]. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2007, 370 p.
Osipov G. Kak otsenit' nauchnye teksty [How to evaluate scientific texts]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
Renkel' A. Rozhdennye molniei [Born by lightning]. Izobretatel' i ratsionalizator – Inventor and rationalizer, 2010, no. 9, pp. 28–29.
Smirnov P.I. Tsennost': stimul deyatel'nosti i odno iz osnovnykh ponyatii sotsiologii [The value: an incentive of activity and one of the basic concepts of sociology]. Teoreticheskii zhurnal “Credo new” – Theoretical journal Credo new, 2011, no. 1, pp. 139–157.
Sukharev O.S. Psikhologicheskie faktory v analize innovatsionnogo povedeniya i ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Psychological factors in the analysis of innovative behavior and economic development]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2013, no. 11, pp. 2–11.
Taratynov O.V., Taratynov P.O. Kontseptual'nyi podkhod k formirovaniyu informatsionnogo polya v tekhnologicheskikh sistemakh [A conceptual approach to the development of an information field in the technology systems]. Trudy MGIU – Proceedings of MSIU, 2011, vol. 1, pp. 48–56.
Khudoverdova S.A.Model' informatsionnogo obespecheniya innovatsii v obrazovanii [The information support model to ensure innovation in education]. Standarty i monitoring v obrazovanii – Standards and monitoring in education, 2014, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 55–58.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013. Available at: Link.
