National Interests: Priorities and Security

Socio-economic disparities as a result of imperfect redistribution processes

Vol. 14, Iss. 7, JULY 2018

Received: 30 March 2018

Received in revised form: 22 April 2018

Accepted: 14 May 2018

Available online: 16 July 2018


JEL Classification: Е24, Е25, Е59, Е62, О11

Pages: 1235–1250

Ermakova E.R. National Research Mordovia State University, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation

ORCID id: not available

Importance The article discusses economic relationships as part of redistribution of wealth and income that caused the socio-economic disparity nationwide.
Objectives The research traces the trade-off between the socio-economic disparity of Russia and distinctions of the redistribution process in terms of cross-country comparison.
Methods The research is based on analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, methods of grouping, analogy, comparison and expert assessment, and comprehensive and systems approaches.
Results I perused proceedings by the Russian and foreign scholars on the socio-economic disparity in different countries. I found factors and causes that fueled the high disparity in Russia, determined the specifics of wealth and income redistribution in Russia at different milestones of historical development. The main focus is put on the current situation, when the existing disparity hampers the priority development nationwide and technological advancement and new industrialization of economy. Based on official statistics from Russia and Europe, data of the World Bank and Euromonitor International, I made a cross-country comparison by socio-economic disparity.
Conclusions The redistribution policy of Russia needs to be adjusted, thus requiring a progressive scale of taxation, incentives for higher labor productivity, pay increase within GDP, manufacturing enterprises in regions with high unemployment rates, investment in professional training, etc.

Keywords: socio-economic disparity, redistribution policy, new industrialization


  1. Kuznets S. Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 1955, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–28.
  2. Stiglitz J. Tsena neravenstva [The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2015, 512 p.
  3. Stiglitz J., Sen A., Fitoussi J.-P. Neverno otsenivaya nashu zhizn'. Pochemu VVP ne imeet smysla? Doklad Komissii po izmereniyu effektivnosti ekonomiki i sotsial'nogo progressa [Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up? The Report of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publ., 2016, 216 p.
  4. Piketty T. Kapital v 21 veke [Le Capital au XXIe siècle]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 2015, 512 p.
  5. Shevyakov A.Yu., Kiruta A.Ya. Neravenstvo, ekonomicheskii rost i demografiya: neissledovannye vzaimosvyazi [Inequality, economic growth and demography: Unexplored links]. Moscow, M‑Studio Publ., 2009, 192 p.
  6. Popov V.V., Dzhomo K.S. [Long-term trends in income distribution]. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2016, no. 3, pp. 146–160. (In Russ.)
  7. Lyubimov I. [A view on the income disparity evolution: Piketty against Kuznets – 60 years afterwards]. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2016, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 27–42. (In Russ.)
  8. Grigor'ev I. [Le Capital by T. Piketty and Das Kapital by Marx]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2016, no. 6, pp. 25–34. (In Russ.)
  9. Golubev V., Tarko A. [Inequality and development]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 12, pp. 3–13. (In Russ.)
  10. Gubanov S. [The development paradigm of new industrialization: Brief summary]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2017, no. 11, pp. 22–39. (In Russ.)
  11. Kokhno P. [Priority development economy needs a progressive scale of personal income tax]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2017, no. 11, pp. 40–50. (In Russ.)
  12. Gorin V.A., Zemskova E.S. [The income difference's as an impediment for model formation of innovation economic growth]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2010, no. 30, pp. 69–71. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  13. Murashov Ya., Ratnikova T. Under-Reported Income of Russian Households. Russian Journal of Economics, 2016, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–85. URL: Link
  14. Filatov I.V. Teoreticheskoe nasledie S. Kuznetsa i problemy modernizatsii postsotsialisticheskikh stran. V kn.: Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya transformatsiya v Rossii [Theoretical legacy of S. Kuznets and modernization issues of post-socialist countries. In: Socio-economic transformation in Russia]. Moscow, Moscow Public Scientific Fund Publ., 2002, pp. 77–98.
  15. Plyshevskii B. [Capital accumulation in the post-Soviet period]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2016, no. 9, pp. 22–36. (In Russ.)
  16. Zakharov V., Golikova E. [On dependence of the national well-being and progressivity of the taxation scale]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2015, no. 8, pp. 23–40. (In Russ.)
  17. Arkhipov A.I., Kormishkina L.A., Koroleva L.P. [Taxation as an initial basis for regulating the processes of building wealth in the context of promoting economic inclusive growth]. Gorizonty ekonomiki = Economic Horizons, 2016, no. 2, pp. 51–60. (In Russ.)
  18. Luk'yanchikova T., Yamshchikova T. [Labor and capital: Labor conflicts or social partnership]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2017, no. 5, pp. 77–88. (In Russ.)
  19. Slobodenyuk E.D., Anikin V.A. [Locating the poverty threshold in Russia]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2018, no. 1, pp. 104–127. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 14, Iss. 10
October 2018