National Interests: Priorities and Security

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

Socio-economic stability as a fundamental national interest of Russia during the decay of the unipolar world order

Vol. 14, Iss. 9, SEPTEMBER 2018

Received: 11 May 2018

Received in revised form: 31 May 2018

Accepted: 20 June 2018

Available online: 14 September 2018


JEL Classification: Е71, Н82, K11

Pages: 1582–1594

Rubanik V.E. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation

Importance The article examines the specifics of determining, formulating and serving Russia's national interests during the decay of the unipolar world order.
Objectives In this research, I trace common trends, patterns and distinctions in the development of the socio-economic, governmental and political life in Russia during the decay of the unipolar world order in comparison with global and regional processes. I determine the most vital national interests of Russia.
Methods I adhere to key principles and conclusions of socio-deterministic epistemology of social and national phenomena, dialectic, systems and functional approach to their study. I introduce criteria of unbiased approach, compliance with the truth, historical truth, logic, sequence, unity of logic and history.
Results I substantiate and prove that socio-economic stability of the public and State is a key national interest of Russia today, when the unipolar world order subsides. It depends on a real defensive capacity of the country contributing to a kind of military shield protecting the country from external effects. This requires an economic model of the society, which would be as autonomous as possible.
Conclusions and Relevance In today's Russia, the ruling class should admit the unity of collective and national interests so that negative phenomena could be overwhelmed to ensure the national security. It will help protect the Russian civilization. The conclusions and principles herein can contribute to improvement of the existing model of strategic and systemic decision, outlining the national security strategy and a set of measures to implement it, choosing actions to recover the reputation of the Russian political and business elite.

Keywords: Russian civilization, Russian sovereignty, national interest


  1. Karaganov S.A. [The 21st century: Contours of the world order]. Rossiya v global'noi politike = Russia in Global Affairs, 2005, no. 5, pp. 36–50. (In Russ.)
  2. Batyk V.I., Bogaturov A.D., Gvozdarev B.I. et al. Politika SShA v menyayushchemsya mire: kollektivnaya monografiya [The U.S. policy in a changing world: a collective monograph]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2004, 333 p.
  3. Semeiko L.S. Transformatsiya voenno-politicheskogo kursa SShA (novye global'nye aspekty) [Transformation of the U.S. military-political course: New global aspects]. Moscow, Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies RAS Publ., 2005, 118 p.
  4. Platonov O.A., Reisegger G. Mirovaya gegemoniya Ameriki. Letopis' krovavykh prestuplenii [The global hegemony of the USA. The chronicles of atrocities]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2012, 473 p.
  5. Vneshnyaya politika Rossii v usloviyakh global'noi neopredelennosti: kollektivnaya monografiya [Foreign trade policy of Russia under the global uncertainty: a collective monograph]. Moscow, RuScience Publ., 2015, 280 p.
  6. Utkin A.I. Edinstvennaya sverkhderzhava [The only superpower]. Moscow, Algoritm Publ., 2003, 477 p.
  7. Gadzhiev K.S. Geopoliticheskie gorizonty Rossii: kontury novogo miroporyadka [Geopolitical horizons of Russia: Contours of the new world order]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2007, 750 p.
  8. Kokoshin A.A. [Is Russia a superpower, great or regional power?]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn' = International Affairs, 2002, no. 9-10, pp. 36–66. (In Russ.)
  9. Utkin A.I. Amerikanskaya imperiya [The U.S. Empire]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2003, 736 p.
  10. Huntington S. The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs, 1999, no. 3-4, pp. 38–52.
  11. Lur'e S.V., Kazaryan L.G. [The world policy and its forecast indicators]. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya = POLIS. Political Studies, 2012, no. 2, pp. 85–97. (In Russ.)
  12. Piskulov Yu.V. [Geopolitical risks in the global economy and international trade]. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik = Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 2015, no. 2, pp. 14–21. (In Russ.)
  13. Savel'ev A., Maruev A. [Geopolitical targets of new Russia: internal threats and resources]. Obozrevatel' – Observer, 2009, no. 12, pp. 6–15. (In Russ.)
  14. Makarenko V.V. Kto soyuzniki Rossii? Mental'nost' i geopolitika: paradoksy politiki bezopasnosti Rossii [Who are Russia's allies? Mentality and geopolitics: Paradoxes of Russia's security policy]. Moscow, Stradiz Publ., 2000, 253 p.
  15. Neklessa A.I. [Overcoming Eurasia: A geoeconomic study]. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya = POLIS. Political Studies, 2014, no. 3, pp. 27–46. (In Russ.)
  16. Zamyatin D.N. [National interests as a system of 'packed' political-geographical images]. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya = POLIS. Political Studies, 2000, no. 1, pp. 78–81. (In Russ.)
  17. Zamyatin D.N. [The geopolitics of images and the structuring of meta-expanse]. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya = POLIS. Political Studies, 2003, no. 1, pp. 82–102. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 15, Iss. 5
May 2019