National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Specifics of regulatory barriers to the market environment at the mesoeconomic level: Evidence from the Mari El Republic

Vol. 14, Iss. 11, NOVEMBER 2018

Received: 11 July 2018

Received in revised form: 31 August 2018

Accepted: 19 September 2018

Available online: 16 November 2018

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY

JEL Classification: A11, O10, O18, R10, R11

Pages: 2022–2035

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.14.11.2022

Chernykh V.V. Volga State University of Technology (VSUT), Yoshkar-Ola, Mari El Republic, Russian Federation
ChernyhVV@volgatech.net

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6502-6469

Subject The article examines the market environment at the mesoeconomic level and constrains, such as administrative barriers generating positive and negative effects.
Objectives The research reveals contradictions of theories of administrative barriers, unveils their economic and institutional nature. I analyze the regulatory barrier mechanism in terms of the Nature – Consequence – Result model and specify the classification of administrative barriers. The article also focuses on the effect administrative barriers have on the market environment, illustrating the mesoeconomic level of the Mari El Republic.
Methods The research is based on the comparative analysis of scientific arguments, analysis of statistical data, data aggregation, and general research methods, such as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, structural and logic modeling.
Results I classified administrative barriers, ascertained the possibility to regulate them and monitored financial results of unprofitable entities in the mesoeconomic markets of the Mari El Republic by urban districts and municipalities, from perspectives of salaries payable at the mesoeconomic level within the period from 2004 to 2016. The article also analyzes trends in the average pay in various economic sectors of the Mari El Republic.
Conclusions The positive effect of regulatory barriers is generated from a growth in profit, new enterprises, better conditions for business cooperation, higher budgetary revenue and better living standards. The negative effect of regulatory barriers worsen the business environment, lower profit and corporate bankruptcy. Under such circumstances, the economy sees lower budgetary revenue, higher salaries payable, poorer living standards. Regulatory barriers in the market environment should pursue positive effects and lowering of negative consequences.

Keywords: market, market environment, regulatory barrier, mesoeconomic level

References:

  1. North D.C. Structure and Change in Economic History. W.W. Norton & Company, 1981, p. 16.
  2. Mil'ner B.Z. Predislovie k rabote D. Norta ‘Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki’ [Preface to the book by D.C. North ‘Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Preface’]. Moscow, Nachala Publ., 1997.
  3. De Soto E. Inoi put'. Nevidimaya revolyutsiya v tret'em mire [The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World]. Moscow, Catallaxy Publ., 1995, 320 p.
  4. Coase R. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 21.
  5. Coase R.H. The Firm, the Market and the Law. University of Chicago Press, 1981, p. 25.
  6. Auzan A., Kryuchkova P. [Administrative barriers in the economy: Tasks of lock-out]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2001, no. 5, p. 73. (In Russ.)
  7. Kryuchkova P.V. Administrativnye bar'ery v rossiiskoi ekonomike [Administrative Barriers to the Russian Economy]. Moscow, Institute of National Projects Publ., 2001, 48 p.
  8. Gladyshev A., Patrushev V., Ivanov V. Munitsipal'naya nauka: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika [Municipal science: theory, methodology, practice]. Moscow, Munitsipal'nyi mir Publ., 2003, 288 p.
  9. Petrov I.V. Demonopolizatsiya rynkov v protsesse obespecheniya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti makroregiona: vosproizvodstvennyi podkhod [Demonopolization of markets while ensuring the economic security of the macroregion: A reproductive approach]. Moscow, YUNITI DANA Publ., 2005, pp. 58–61.
  10. Thompson W.E., Hickey J.V. Society in Focus: An Introduction to Sociology. Harper Collins College Publishers, 1993, pp. 12–14.
  11. Polterovich V.M. [Institutes of catching-up development (On the project of a new model for economic development of Russia)]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2016, no. 5, pp. 34–56. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  12. Keynes J.M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Palgrave McMillan, 1936, 472 p.
  13. Petrov A., Pospelov I. [Innovative breakthrough development: Forecasting estimates]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2007, no. 1, p. 15. (In Russ.)
  14. Cornell S., Kalt J. Where Does Economic Development Really Come From? Constitutional Rule among the Contemporary Sioux and Apache. Economic Inquiry, 1995, vol. 33, iss. 3, pp. 402–426. URL: Link
  15. Chernykh V.V. Mestnye rynki Respubliki Marii El: zakonomernosti funktsionirovaniya i vozmozhnosti razvitiya: monografiya [Local markets of the Mari El Republic: Operational patterns and development opportunities: a monograph]. Yoshkar-Ola, Volga State Technological University Publ., 2015, 160 p.
  16. Adrianov Yu., Nizova L., Sannikova T. Tripartism as the factor of development of the higher school (by the example of the Volga State University of Technology). Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 2017, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 225–230. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 14, Iss. 12
December 2018

Archive