National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Abstracting and Indexing

РИНЦ
Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Worldcat
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available

EBSCOhost
Eastview
Elibrary
Biblioclub

Archiving

Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

A comparative analysis of approaches to recreation development in specially protected areas in the Republic of Karelia (Russia) and Finland

Vol. 15, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2019

Received: 23 July 2019

Received in revised form: 10 August 2019

Accepted: 26 August 2019

Available online: 15 October 2019

Subject Heading: Foreign experience

JEL Classification: P25, Q26

Pages: 1969–1980

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.15.10.1969

Vasil'eva A.V. Institute of Economics of Karelian Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences (KarRC RAS), Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation
vasnask@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6019-819X

Subject The article constitutes the comparative analysis of approaches to recreation development in specially protected areas of the Republic of Karelia (Russia) and Finland.
Objectives The research identifies what distinguishes the development of tourism and recreation in specially protected areas along the Russian–Finnish border.
Methods The research employs methods of comparative analysis and generalization, structural analysis, methods of mathematical processing of statistical data and cartographic method.
Results I formulated provisions on the efficiency of using recreation development indicators, investigated how the borderline position influences the subjects under study on both sides of the border. The article provides guidance to spur the commercialization of the Russian specially protected areas in line with the Finnish expertise and practices.
Conclusions and Relevance Despite an increasing interest in specially protected areas, such natural locations of Karelia have not yet become points of growth for local businesses. Comparing a flow of tourists and recreation proposition in Karelia’s specially protected areas, it is evident that Finland has much higher incoming tourist flows and offers a wider spectrum of services. Finland’s practices should be taken into consideration when organizing the work in specially protected areas of Russia. Logistic solutions and their fulfillment seem to be a cornerstone for recreation activities, balancing interests of all parties and a set of marketing activities. The findings can be used in practice of specially protected areas, by executive authorities at the regional and municipal level, would-be investors and businessmen, thus involving more natural resources in economic activity and make services of specially protected areas more affordable.

Keywords: regional economy, recreation and tourism, protected area, border region

References:

  1. Vasil'eva A.V. [Specific of developing the sustainable tourism in the border region: Evidence from the Republic of Karelia]. Vestnik Belgorodskogo universiteta kooperatsii, ekonomiki i prava = Herald of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, 2015, no. 3, pр. 350–357. (In Russ.)
  2. Naumov A.V., Dement'eva S.M., Vorob'ev S.A. [Current state and directions of development of the protected areas of regional importance in the Tver Oblast]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Biologiya i ekologiya = Herald of TVGU. Series: Biology and Ecology, 2017, no. 1, pр. 237–245. (In Russ.)
  3. Samylina V.G. [Protected areas of the European North of Russia: Reality, problems and prospects]. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya = Innovative Economy: Prospects for Development and Improvement, 2015, no. 5, pр. 65–80. (In Russ.)
  4. Canteiro M., Córdova-Tapia F., Brazeiro A. Tourism Impact Assessment: A Tool to Evaluate the Environmental Impacts of Touristic Activities in Natural Protected Areas. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2018, vol. 28, pp. 220–227. URL: Link
  5. Tolvanen A., Kangas K. Tourism, Biodiversity and Protected Areas – Review from Northern Fennoscandia. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, vol. 169, pp. 58–66. URL: Link
  6. Luzhkova N.M. [Geoecological approach to infrastructural development of hiking trails in federal-level SPNA (as exemplified by the Baikalskii natural reserve)]. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy = Geography and Natural Resources, 2016, no. 1, pp. 70–79. (In Russ.)
  7. Indyukova M.A., Dunets A.N., Krasnoyarova B.A. [Protected areas of the Russian part of the Altai-Sayan region as objects of ecotourism]. Izvestiya Altaiskogo otdeleniya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva = Bulletin of the Altai Branch of the Russian Geographical Society, 2015, no. 4, pp. 5–12. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  8. Borovichev E.A., Petrova O.V., Koroleva N.E. et al. [Green Belt of Fennoscandia in the Murmansk region: Resources and environmental protection potential and prospects of development]. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka = The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order, 2018, no. 6, pp. 80–88. (In Russ.)
  9. Shkiperova G.T. [Assessment of eco-economic effect for specially protected areas]. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo = Social Area, 2018, no. 3, pp 1–10. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  10. Gon Chung M., Dietz T., Liu J. Global Relationships between Biodiversity and Nature-based Tourism in Protected Areas. Ecosystem Services, 2018, vol. 34, part A, pp. 11–23. URL: Link
  11. Kryshen' A.M., Litinskii P.Yu., Genikova N.V. et al. [Allocating ecological corridors within the Green Belt of Fennoscandia]. Trudy Karel'skogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014, no. 6, pp. 157–162. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  12. Yoonjung K., Choong-ki K., Dong Kun L. et al. Quantifying Nature-Based Tourism in Protected Areas in Developing Countries by Using Social Big Data. Tourism Management, 2019, vol. 72, pp. 249–256. URL: Link
  13. Tikhonova T.V. [Evaluation of the efficiency of development of specially protected natural areas in the Republic of Komi]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: Fakty. Tendentsii. Prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2015, no. 1, pp. 182–195. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  14. Druzhinin P.V., Shkiperova G.T., Kurilo A.E [Territorial development in the Green Belt of Fennoscandia based on tourism activation]. Trudy KarNTs RAN. Zelenyi poyas Fennoskandii = Transactions of Karelian Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences. Green Belt of Fennoscandia, 2019, no. 4, pp. 154–165. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 15, Iss. 11
November 2019

Archive