National Interests: Priorities and Security

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (12 month OA embargo)

The impact of science, innovation and concentration of production enterprises on the economic growth in the Russian regions

Vol. 15, Iss. 12, DECEMBER 2019

Received: 25 September 2019

Received in revised form: 11 October 2019

Accepted: 31 October 2019

Available online: 13 December 2019


JEL Classification: C21, O10

Pages: 23272343

Untura G.A. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IEIE SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Kaneva M.A. Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, Moscow, Russian Federation

Zabolotskii A.A. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IEIE SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Subject The article examines how knowledge spillover influences economic factors.
Objectives The study evaluates how the growth rate of GRP per capita responds to the impact of expenditures on S&T, knowledge spillover due to geographical neighborhood, organization of economic activities, concentration and specialization of production enterprises and engineering efforts of people in the Russian regions.
Methods The study relies upon the cross-sectional regression analysis of 80 regions and four sectors of economy by section of the Russian Classifier of Types of Economic Activity (OKVED).
Results In those regions that have the moderate and definite specialization (HerfindahlHirschman index) the growth rate of GRP per capita appeared to be higher than the average of 80 regions. Analyzing economic sectors, we figured out that strong innovative regions had a higher growth rate of GRP per capita as compared to the other regions. Those regions that finance R&D demonstrated a growth in GRP per capita coupled with an increase in engineering efforts.
Conclusions and Relevance Referring to calculations based on the 2013 data, we found the effect generated with a combination of two related groups of growth drivers increasing the growth rates of GRP per capita, i.e. investment in technological innovation and economic structure across regions that feature various economic sectors and industries or concentration of production enterprises. Our conclusions and recommendations are of applied nature with respect to goals set by the Strategy of Spatial Development of Russia.

Keywords: economic growth, innovation, HerfindahlHirschman index, cross-sectional regression


  1. Batabyal A., Nijkamp P. Human Capital Use, Innovation, Patent Protection, and Economic Growth in Multiple Regions. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2013, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 113126. URL: Link
  2. Lavrovskii B.L. [Russian regions in the system of global workforce productivity trends]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region Economics and Sociology, 2017, vol. 3, pp. 5068. (In Russ.)
  3. Aghion P., Howitt P. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 1992, vol. 60, iss. 2, pp. 323351. URL: Link
  4. Barro R.J. Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, vol. 98, no. 5-2, pp. S103125. URL: Link
  5. DeLong J.B., Summers L.H. Equipment Investment and Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991, vol. 106, iss. 2, pp. 445502.
  6. Yusupova A.T., Khalimova S.R. [Characteristics, features of development, regional and sectoral determinants of high-tech business in Russia]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2017, no. 12, pp. 142154. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  7. Zemtsov S.P., Chernov A.V. [What high-tech companies in Russia grow faster and why?]. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2017, no. 1, pp. 6899. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  8. Kolomak E.A. [Evolution of the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity in Russia]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2014, no. 3, pp. 7593. (In Russ.)
  9. Ezcurra R., Pascual P., Rapun M. Regional Specialization in the European Union. Regional Studies, 2006, vol. 40, iss. 6, pp. 601616. URL: Link
  10. Jaffe A.B. Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profit and Market Share. The American Economic Review, 1986, vol. 76, iss. 5, pp. 9841001.
  11. Rodgriguez-Pose A., Villareal Peralta E.M. Innovation and Regional Growth in Mexico: 20002010. Growth and Change, 2015, vol. 46, iss. 2, pp. 172195. URL: Link
  12. Pilyasov A.N. Sinergiya prostranstva: regional'nye innovatsionnye sistemy, klastery i peretoki znaniya: monografiya [Synergy of Space: Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters and Knowledge Spillovers: a monograph]. Smolensk, Oikumena Publ., 2012, 760 p.
  13. Aivazyan S.A., Afanas'ev M.Yu., Rudenko V.A. [Efficiency estimation of the Russian regions based on the productive potential model including the characteristics of readiness to innovate]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods, 2014, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 3470. (In Russ.)
  14. Zemtsov S.P., Smelov Yu.A. [Factors of Regional Development in Russia: Geography, Human Capital and Regional Policies]. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2018, no. 4, pp. 84104. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  15. Kaneva M.A., Untura G.A. [The relationship between R&D, knowledge spillovers and dynamics of economic growth of the Russian regions]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2017, iss. 1, pp. 78100. (In Russ.)
  16. Kaneva M.A., Untura G.A. [Evolution of Theories and Empirical Models of a Relationship between Economic Growth, Science and Innovations (Part 2)]. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya = World of Economics and Management, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 517. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  17. Mel'nikov R.M., Teslenko V.A. [Evaluating the impact of human capital on economic dynamics in Russian regions]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2018, no. 1, pp. 93115. (In Russ.)
  18. Lucas R.E. On the Mechanic of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, vol. 22, iss. 1, pp. 342. URL: Link90168-7
  19. Romer P. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, vol. 98, iss. 5, pp. S71102.
  20. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1995.
  21. Lündvall B.A. Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Industrial Development. Research, Series 31. Aalborg, Aalborg University Press, 1985, 39 p.
  22. Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London, Pinter, 1987, 155 p.
  23. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. Local Geographical Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 1997, vol. 42, iss. 3, pp. 422448. URL: Link
  24. Marrocu E., Paci R., Usai S. Proximity, Networking and Knowledge Production in Europe: What Lessons for Innovation Policy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, vol. 80, iss. 8, pp. 14841498. URL: Link
  25. Aldieri L., Kotsemir M.N., Vinci C.P. Knowledge Spillover Effects: Empirical Evidence from Russian Regions. Quality & Quantity, 2018, vol. 52, iss. 5, pp. 21112132. URL: Link
  26. Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P. R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. The American Economic Review, 1996, vol. 86, iss. 3, pp. 630640.
  27. Moreno R., Paci R., Usai S. Innovation Clusters in the European Regions. European Planning Studies, 2006, vol. 14, iss. 9, pp. 12351263. URL: Link
  28. Marshall . Principles of Economics. London, MacMillan, 1980.
  29. Jacobs J. The Economy of Cities. London, Jonathan Cape, 1969.
  30. Farra F., Klos N., Schober U. et al. Improving Regional Performance in Russia Capability-Based Approach. EBRD Working Papers, 2013, no. 155. URL: Link
  31. Gokhberg L.M., Kuznetsova T.E. [New Innovation Policy in the Context of Modernization of the Economy]. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2010, vol. 7, pp. 141143. (In Russ.)
  32. Kravchenko N.A. [The estimations of the regional economy diversification (the case of Siberian Federal District Regions)]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2015, no. 4, pp. 6589. (In Russ.)
  33. Golichenko O. [Public policy and national innovation system facilities]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2017, no. 2, pp. 97108. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  34. Kaneva M., Untura G. The Impact of R&D and Knowledge Spillovers on the Economic Growth of Russian Regions. Growth and Change, 2019, iss. 50, iss. 1, pp. 301334. URL: Link
  35. Kryukov V.A., Suslov V.I., Baranov A.O. et al. Russia 2030: Science and Technology Foresight: Revisiting the Draft. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2019, vol. 30, iss. 3, pp. 261267. URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 1
January 2020