+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Breakthrough digital technologies in public administration

Vol. 16, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2020

Received: 30 September 2019

Received in revised form: 18 October 2019

Accepted: 6 November 2019

Available online: 16 January 2020

Subject Heading: NATIONAL INTERESTS

JEL Classification: M15, M38, M48, O32

Pages: 4–16

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.16.1.4

Lamzin R.M. Volgograd State Social and Pedagogical University (VSSPU), Volgograd, Russian Federation
rom.lamzin@yandex.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject Modern digital technologies open multiple opportunities for handing data resources quickly in various areas of economy and management. Streamlining dramatic innovation in public administration of economic processes, such technologies demonstrate the highest efficiency.
Objectives The study overviews the socio-economic and administrative specifics of advanced electronic and digital technologies and analyzes their outcome in public administration. I also evaluate whether digital technologies can be effectively used to promote the interaction of public authorities and private business.
Methods The study is based on methods of analyzing and synthesizing various aspects of electronic and digital technologies. The comparison identifies distinctive features of some digital technologies as part of the overall transformation and use of information resources in public administration. The structural and functional method helps find the specifics of digital technologies in delivering relevant information for public administration and public-private partnership.
Results I found the main characteristics of advanced electronic and digital technologies, which significantly facilitate the dramatic improvement of public administration to ensure sustainable and cost effective communications with the business sector.
Conclusions and Relevance In the current socio-economic circumstances, breakthrough digital technologies may serve for a wide spectrum of purposes streamlining concerted efforts of summarizing, classifying and migrating different data needed to make effective managerial decisions in public administration. Such technologies accelerate various communications among public authorities to coordinate their efforts for regulating economic processes.

Keywords: public administration, information resources, digital technology, public-private partnership

References:

  1. Dement'eva T.Yu. [Theoretical and legal aspects of public authorities]. Vektor nauki TGU = Vector of Sciences of Togliatti State University, 2011, no. 1, pp. 152–155. (In Russ.)
  2. Barabanov O.N. [Analytical paradigms underpinning debate on global governance]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika = International Organisations Research Journal, 2009, no. 2, pp. 5–13. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  3. Kartskhiya A.A. [Digital imperative: New technologies create a new reality]. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava = Intellectual Property. Copyright and Related Rights, 2017, no. 8, pp. 17–26. (In Russ.)
  4. Elin V.M. [Cloud services and peculiarities of their legal regulation in the Russian Federation]. Informatsionnoe pravo = Informational Law, 2017, no. 4, pp. 28–33. (In Russ.)
  5. Vertakova Yu.V., Bykovskaya E.V. Vozmozhnosti innovatsionno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya promyshlennykh predpriyatii RF v usloviyakh tsifrovoi transformatsii ekonomiki. V kn.: Razvitie tsifrovoi ekonomiki v usloviyakh deglobalizatsii i retsessii [ICT capabilities for developing industrial enterprises of the Russian Federation during the digital transformation of the economy. In: Promoting the digital economy during de-globalization and recession]. St. Petersburg, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnical University Publ., 2019, pp. 379–405.
  6. Vertakova Yu.V., Risin I.E. [Formation of system of structural development monitoring of the regional economy]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski = State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, 2019, no. 2, pp. 23–34. (In Russ.)
  7. Izmalkova I.V., Vertakova Yu.V. [A comprehensive risk assessment methodology for cluster enterprises]. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management, 2019, no. 5, pp. 66–74. (In Russ.)
  8. Moseiko V.O., Fesenko V.V., Bogomolova I.V. [Innovation potential assessment of an enterprise on the basis of factor approach]. Vestnik VolGU. Ser. 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya = Science Journal of VolSU. Global Economic System, 2008, no. 2, pp. 78–85. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Nagimova A.M. [Efficiency of the activity of the government and the local government as the base of increase quality of life of the regional society]. Ekonomicheskii vestnik Respubliki Tatarstan = Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan, 2011, no. 4, pp. 31–35. (In Russ.)
  10. Pazdnikova N.P. [The methodical approach to an assessment of efficiency and risks of municipal programs]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2015, no. 3, pp. 248–250. (In Russ.)
  11. Talapina E.V. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v informatsionnom obshchestve (pravovoi aspekt) [Public administration in the information society: Legal considerations]. Moscow, Yurisprudentsiya Publ., 2015, 192 p.
  12. Fedotova G.V. [Digitization issues of the manufacturing sector]. Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' = National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2019, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 273–283. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  13. Plotnikov V.A., Fedotova G., Popkova E., Kastyurina A. Harmonization of Strategic Planning Indicators of Territories Socioeconomic Growth. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 2015, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 105–114.
  14. Inshakov O.V. Antikrizisnoe regulirovanie ekonomiki regiona: monitoring i politika mobilizatsii: monografiya [Anti-crisis regulation of the region’s economy: Monitoring and mobilization policy: a monograph]. Volgograd, Volgograd State University Publ., 2010, 326 p.
  15. Gruening G. Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 2001, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 1–25. URL: Link00041-1
  16. Mack C.S. Business, Politics, and the Practice of Government Relations. Westport, 1997, 288 p.
  17. Martin C. Consider the Source! Determinants of Corporate Preferences for Public Policy. In: D. Coen, W. Grant (eds) Business and Government: Methods and Practice. Opladen, Germany, Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2006, pp. 19–78.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive