Regional Economics: Theory and Practice
 

Contributors to poverty and income inequality in the Volga Federal District

Vol. 16, Iss. 11, NOVEMBER 2018

Received: 17 September 2018

Received in revised form: 1 October 2018

Accepted: 8 October 2018

Available online: 16 November 2018

Subject Heading: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONS

JEL Classification: R13, R28

Pages: 2044–2058

https://doi.org/10.24891/re.16.11.2044

Ovchinnikov V.N. Financial Research Institute of Ministry of Finance of Russian Federation (FRI), Moscow, Russian Federation
vyacheslav_ovchinnikov_1993@mail.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject The article examines and discusses the issues of income differentiation and inequality in the Volga Federal District of the Russian Federation.
Objectives The article aims to identify and assess in the econometric aspect the factors of relative poverty and income differentiation in the Volga Federal District.
Methods For the study, I used the methods of analysis of descriptive statistics, specification and econometric estimation of logit regressions for the level of relative poverty. The decomposition approach includes the technique of decomposition of the Theil inequality index by group, as well as the regression method of decomposition of income differentiation.
Results The article describes the factors contributing to the differentiation of income of the population, and those ones that increase the likelihood of overcoming the threshold of relative poverty.
Conclusions and Relevance Gender and educational status make the most appreciable contribution to differentiation of incomes in the Volga Federal District. The results obtained can be used in a targeted economic policy aimed to mitigate the excess level of inequality and overcome poverty in the District.

Keywords: poverty, inequality, Theil index, decomposition, Mincer Earnings Function, Fields method, logit regression

References:

  1. Foster J.E. Absolute versus Relative Poverty. The American Economic Review, May 1998, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 335–341. URL: Link
  2. Grishina E.E. [The material deprivation rate for households with children in Russia and European countries]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2017, no. 4, pp. 47–55. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  3. Mulok D., Kogid M., Asid R., Lily J. Is Economic Growth Sufficient for Poverty Alleviation? Empirical Evidence from Malaysia. Cuadernos de Economia, 2012, vol. 35, iss. 97, pp. 26–32. URL: Link70020-1
  4. Salvatore D. Growth and Poverty in a Globalizing World. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2004, vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 543–551. URL: Link
  5. Lazaryan S.S., Chernotalova M.A. [Global risk of rising inequality]. Nauchno-issledovatel'skii finansovyi institut. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2017, no. 4, pp. 34–46. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  6. Kapelyushnikov R.I. [Inequality: How not to primitivize the problem]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2017, no. 4, pp. 117–139. (In Russ.)
  7. Biyase M., Zwane T. An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Poverty and Household Welfare in South Africa. The Journal of Developing Areas, 2018, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 115–130. URL: Link
  8. Garza-Rodriguez J. The Determinants of Poverty in the Mexican States of the US-Mexico Border. Estudios Fronterizos, 2016, vol. 17, no. 33, pp. 141–167. URL: Link
  9. Denisova I., Kartseva M. Poverty Is No Crime: Measuring Poverty in Russian Regions. CEFIR / NES Working Paper Series. Working Paper, 2005, no. 84, 60 p. URL: Link
  10. Kapelyuk S.D. [Regional minimum salary in Russia: econometric analysis]. Vestnik NGUEU = Vestnik NSUEM, 2014, no. 1, pp. 157–169. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  11. Tripathi S. Source of Inequality in Consumption Expenditure in India: A Regression-Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis. MPRA Paper, 2016, no. 72117, 34 p. URL: Link
  12. Bigotta M., Krishnakumar J., Rani U. Further Results on the Regression-Based Approach to Inequality Decomposition with Evidence from India. Empirical Economics, 2015, vol. 48, iss. 3, pp. 1233–1266. URL: Link
  13. Aizawa T., Dekle R., Helble M. Sources of Income Inequality: A Comparison of Japan and the United States. ADBI Working Paper Series, 2017, no. 663, 13 p. URL: Link
  14. Ovcharova L.N., Popova D.O., Rudberg A.M. [Decomposition of income inequality in contemporary Russia]. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2016, no. 3, pp. 170–186. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  15. Cowell F. Theil, Inequality Indices and Decomposition. ECINEQ Working Paper Series, 2005, no. 1, 18 p. URL: Link
  16. Fields G.S. Accounting for Income Inequality and its Change: A New Method, With Application to the Distribution of Earnings in the United States. Research in Labor Economics, 2003, vol. 22, pp. 1–38. URL: Link
  17. Mincer J.A. The Human Capital Earnings Function. In: Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. Cambridge, Massachusetts, NBER, 1974, pp. 83–96. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8733 (Online)
ISSN 2073-1477 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 12
December 2018

Archive